Summary:
Currently when expanding a SETCC node into a SELECT_CC, LLVM uses
an incorrect type for determining BooleanContent of the result. This
patch fixes the issue.
Fixes PR36079.
Reviewers: rogfer01, javed.absar, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43282
llvm-svn: 325325
This patch combines some cases of ARMISD::CMOV for integers that arise in comparisons of the form
a != b ? x : 0
a == b ? 0 : x
and that currently (e.g. in Thumb1) are emitted as branches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34515
llvm-svn: 325323
We already do this for 64-bit when it won't fit into a 64-bit AND/TEST's immediate field. This adds an additional qualifier to do it for any single bit constant larger than 8-bits under optsize
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43346
llvm-svn: 325290
Same for the sign extend case.
Currently we check for multiple uses on the binop. Then we call ExtendUsesToFormExtLoad to capture SetCCs that use the load. So we only end up finding any setccs when the and has additional uses and the load is used by a setcc. I don't think the and having multiple uses is relevant here. I think we should only be checking for the load having multiple uses.
This changes an NVPTX test because we now find that the load has a second use by a truncate, but ExtendUsesToFormExtLoad only looks at setccs it can extend. All other operations just check isTruncateFree. Maybe we should allow widening of an existing truncate even if its not free?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43063
llvm-svn: 325289
The reference '&' is missing in the function parameter. If there are
back-to-back optimizations in terms of dag node list like below:
t29: i64,ch = load<LD4[bitcast (%struct.test_t* @test.t to i8*)+12](dereferenceable), zext from i32> t3, t43, undef:i64
t34: i64,ch = load<LD4[bitcast (%struct.test_t* @test.t to i8*)](dereferenceable), zext from i32> t3, t41, undef:i64
The bug will trigger a segfault for the added test case remove_truncate_5.ll:
LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory
#0 0x000000000241c4d9 (llc+0x241c4d9)
#1 0x000000000241c56a (llc+0x241c56a)
#2 0x000000000241aa50 (llc+0x241aa50)
...
#22 0x0000000000fd5edf (llc+0xfd5edf)
#23 0x00007f0fe03bec05 __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21c05)
#24 0x0000000000fd3e69 (llc+0xfd3e69)
...
Segmentation fault
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 325267
Summary:
In LLVM, 't' selects a floating-point/SIMD register and only supports
32-bit values. This is appropriately documented in the LLVM Language
Reference Manual. However, this behaviour diverges from that of GCC, where
't' selects the s0-s31 registers and its qX and dX variants depending on
additional operand modifiers (q/P).
For example, the following C code:
#include <arm_neon.h>
float32x4_t a, b, x;
asm("vadd.f32 %0, %1, %2" : "=t" (x) : "t" (a), "t" (b))
results in the following assembly if compiled with GCC:
vadd.f32 s0, s0, s1
whereas LLVM will show "error: couldn't allocate output register for
constraint 't'", since a, b, x are 128-bit variables, not 32-bit.
This patch extends the use of 't' to mean that of GCC, thus allowing
selection of the lower Q vector regs and their D/S variants. For example,
the earlier code will now compile as:
vadd.f32 q0, q0, q1
This behaviour still differs from that of GCC but I think it is actually
more correct, since LLVM picks up the right register type based on the
datatype of x, while GCC would need an extra operand modifier to achieve
the same result, as follows:
asm("vadd.f32 %q0, %q1, %q2" : "=t" (x) : "t" (a), "t" (b))
Since this is only an extension of functionality, existing code should not
be affected by this change. Note that operand modifiers q/P are already
supported by LLVM, so this patch should suffice to support inline
assembly with constraint 't' originally built for GCC.
Reviewers: grosbach, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: rogfer01, efriedma, olista01, aemerson, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42962
llvm-svn: 325244
We can use PACKSS to saturate each stage of the chain: PACKSSDW down to [-32768,32767] and then PACKSSWB to [-128,127].
PACKUS is a little trickier and will be handled in a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 325235
This is mainly a move of simplifyShuffleOperands from DAGCombiner::visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE to create a more general purpose TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedVectorElts implementation.
Further features can be moved/added in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42896
llvm-svn: 325232
The bound instruction does not have reversed operands in gas.
Fixes PR27653.
Patch by Maya Madhavan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43243
llvm-svn: 325178
Try to keep PACK*SDW/PACK*SWB as wide as possible, this helps ComputeNumSignBits as it can only peek through bitcasts to wider types, pre-AVX2 codegen was already doing this as it could peek through bitcasts/subvectors more easily than AVX2 could through shuffles.
This shouldn't affect existing results as calls to truncateVectorWithPACK ensure we have enough sign bits to pack to the same value, but it should make it possible to use truncateVectorWithPACK chains to perform saturation in combineTruncateWithSat with a future patch.
llvm-svn: 325149
Kernel arguments likely read by all workitems and should not bypass
cache. Fixes performance hit in sub-dword argument loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43249
llvm-svn: 325146
When creating high MachineMemOperand for MSTORE/MLOAD we supply
it with the original PointerInfo, while the pointer itself had been incremented.
The patch adds the proper offset to the PointerInfo.
llvm-svn: 325135
If a load follows a store and reloads data that the store has written to memory, Intel microarchitectures can in many cases forward the data directly from the store to the load, This "store forwarding" saves cycles by enabling the load to directly obtain the data instead of accessing the data from cache or memory.
A "store forward block" occurs in cases that a store cannot be forwarded to the load. The most typical case of store forward block on Intel Core microarchiticutre that a small store cannot be forwarded to a large load.
The estimated penalty for a store forward block is ~13 cycles.
This pass tries to recognize and handle cases where "store forward block" is created by the compiler when lowering memcpy calls to a sequence
of a load and a store.
The pass currently only handles cases where memcpy is lowered to XMM/YMM registers, it tries to break the memcpy into smaller copies.
breaking the memcpy should be possible since there is no atomicity guarantee for loads and stores to XMM/YMM.
Change-Id: Ic41aa9ade6512e0478db66e07e2fde41b4fb35f9
llvm-svn: 325128
While the AVX512 VTRUNCS/VTRUNCUS instructions require legal types, truncateVectorWithPACK handles cases with multiples of legal types through splitting/concatenation. So we just need to ensure that the src/dst scalar types are correct and leave truncateVectorWithPACK to handle the rest of it.
llvm-svn: 325127
Summary:
Instead of solving the hard problem of how to pass the callee to the indirect
jump thunk without a register, just use a CSR. At a call boundary, there's
nothing stopping us from using a CSR to hold the callee as long as we save and
restore it in the prologue.
Also, add tests for this mregparm=3 case. I wrote execution tests for
__llvm_retpoline_push, but they never got committed as lit tests, either
because I never rewrote them or because they got lost in merge conflicts.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dwmw2
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43214
llvm-svn: 325049
Summary:
If the and has an additional use we shouldn't invert it. That creates an additional instruction.
While there add a one use check to the transform above that looked similar.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43225
llvm-svn: 325019
Change ARMConstantIslandPass to:
- accept f16 literals as litpool entries,
- if the litpool needs to be inserted in the middle of a big block, then we
need to 4-byte align the next instruction in ARM mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42784
llvm-svn: 325012
The bug has been lying dormant, but apparently was never exposed, until
after rL324941 because we didn't return the correct result
for shifts with undef operands.
llvm-svn: 325010
