Revert "InstSimplify: Add baseline tests for reported regression"
Revert "InstSimplify: Start cleaning up simplifyFCmpInst"
This reverts commit 0637b00041c7d6a191d51d9966c4f5f41fb97ab5.
This reverts commit 239fb206de35935416e652b89725d5f3193f78f5.
This reverts commit ddb3f12c428bc4bd5a98913d74dfd7f2402bdfd8.
These commits causes crashes when compiling chromium code, attached reduced ir at: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151887#4634914
Also picks up a few improvements (Some of the fcmp.ll
test names imply they aren't quite testing what was intended.
Checking the sign bit can't be performed with a compare to a 0).
Much of the logic in here is the same as the class detection
logic of fcmpToClassTest. We could unify more with a weaker
version of fcmpToClassTest which returns implied classes rather
than exact class-like compares. Also could unify more with detection
of possible classes in non-splat vectors.
One problem here is we now only perform folds that used
to always work now require a context instruction. This is
because fcmpToClassTest requires the parent function.
Either fcmpToClassTest could tolerate a missing context
function, or we could require passing in one to simplifyFCmpInst.
Without this it's possible to hit the !isNan assert (which feels like
an unnecessary assert). In any case, these cases don't appear in
any tests.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151887
We check the loop trip count is known a power of 2 to determine
whether the tail loop can be eliminated in D146199.
However, the remainder loop of mask scalable loop can also be removed
If we know the mask is always going to be true for every vector iteration.
Depend on the assume of power-of-two vscale on D155350
proofs： https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/bT62Wa
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63616.
Reviewed By: goldstein.w.n, nikic, david-arm, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154953
This reverts commit 3e386b227886e2fb77b0c1e9182026c4e049f346.
Next to the original fold, this also implements an unnecessary and
inappropriate simplifyICmpWithDominatingAssume() based fold.
We check the loop trip count is known a power of 2 to determine
whether the tail loop can be eliminated in D146199.
However, the remainder loop of mask scalable loop can also be removed
If we know the mask is always going to be true for every vector iteration.
Depend on the assume of power-of-two vscale on D155350
proofs： https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/FkTMoy
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63616.
Reviewed By: goldstein.w.n, nikic, david-arm, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154953
Use the maximum 64 for BitWidth of getVScaleRange to avoid returning an empty range.
the previous changes bring in a Buildbot failure because MinSVEVectorSize = MinSVEVectorSize.
error: explicitly assigning value of variable of type 'unsigned int' to itself [-Werror,-Wself-assign]
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, nikic, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155708
Use the maximum 64 for BitWidth of getVScaleRange to
avoid returning an empty range.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, nikic, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155708
A similar assumption as for the x^x case also existed for the absorber
case, which lead to a stage2 miscompile. That assumption is not fixed.
-----
Support replacement of operands not only in the immediate
instruction, but also instructions it uses.
To the most part, this extension is straightforward, but there are
two bits worth highlighting:
First, we can now no longer assume that if the Op is a vector, the
instruction also returns a vector. If Op is a vector and the
instruction returns a scalar, we should consider it as a cross-lane
operation.
Second, for the x ^ x special case and the absorber special case, we
can no longer assume that one of the operands is RepOp, as we might
have a replacement higher up the instruction chain.
There is one optimization regression, but it is in a fuzzer-generated
test case.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63104.
Handle constant folding and idempotent folding. Not sure
this is an appropriate use of undef for the inf/nan case. The
C version says the second result is "unspecified". The AMDGPU
instruction returns 0.
This is very likely the cause of a stage 2 failure in
Transforms/LoopVectorize/check-prof-info.ll. Revert until I can
investigate this.
This reverts commit 3d199d086e076f0b9b90d4c59f2226a417a639b5.
Support replacement of operands not only in the immediate
instruction, but also instructions it uses.
To the most part, this extension is straightforward, but there are
two bits worth highlighting:
First, we can now no longer assume that if the Op is a vector, the
instruction also returns a vector. If Op is a vector and the
instruction returns a scalar, we should consider it as a cross-lane
operation.
Second, for the x ^ x special case, we can no longer assume that
the operand is RepOp, as we might have a replacement higher up the
instruction chain.
There is one optimization regression, but it is in a fuzzer-generated
test case.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63104.
After the semantics change from https://reviews.llvm.org/D154051,
gep inbounds x, 0 can no longer produce poison. As such, we can
also perform this fold during non-refining operand replacement
and avoid unnecessary drops of the inbounds flag.
The online alive2 version has not been update to the new
semantics yet, but we can use the following proof locally:
define ptr @src(ptr %base, i64 %offset) {
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %offset, 0
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %base, i64 %offset
%sel = select i1 %cmp, ptr %base, ptr %gep
ret ptr %sel
}
define ptr @tgt(ptr %base, i64 %offset) {
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %base, i64 %offset
ret ptr %gep
}
With the semantics change from D154051, it is no longer valid to
fold gep inbounds undef to poison (unless we know the index is
non-zero). Fold it to undef instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154215
Strengthen the fold for icmps of non-overlapping storage, by
working on the difference of offsets, rather than considering
both offsets independently. In particular, this allows handling
comparisons of pointers to the end of equal-sized allocations.
Proofs: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Po2nL4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153752
D143505 fixed/simplified folding of operations with SNaN operands. In
doing so it introduced a crash when handling scalable vector types,
wherein the scalable-vector ConstantVector was cast to a ConstantFP.
Since we know by that point in the code that if we've found a NaN, we're
dealing with a scalable-vector splat (as there are no other kinds of
scalable-vector constant for which that holds), we can grab the splatted
value and re-use the existing code, which will automatically splat the
new NaN back to a scalable vector for us.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153566
The way this is currently implemented the accumulated offsets can
end up having a different size, which causes unnecessary
complication for further extension of the code.
Don't strip pointer casts at the start and rely on
stripAndAccumulate to do any necessary stripping. It gracefully
handles different index sizes and will always retain the width of
the original pointer index type.
This is not NFC, but unlikely to make any practical difference.
This reverts commit 935c8b6f3a4dda0ff881ed86faaad9fe5b276d70.
Going to fix forward size regression instead due to more dependent patches needing to be reverted otherwise.
This reverts commit 0c03f48480f69b854f86d31235425b5cb71ac921.
Going to fix forward size regression instead due to more dependent patches needing to be reverted otherwise.
`select i1 non-const, i1 true, i1 false` has been optimized to
`non-const`. There is no reason that we can not optimize `select i1
ConstExpr, i1 true, i1 false` to `ConstExpr`.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151631
Unlike every other analysis and transform, simplifyInstruction
permitted operating on instructions which are not inserted
into a function. This created an edge case no other code needs
to really worry about, and limited transforms in cases that
can make use of the context function. Only the inliner and a handful
of other utilities were making use of this, so just fix up these
edge cases. Results in some IR ordering differences since
cloned blocks are inserted eagerly now. Plus some additional
simplifications trigger (e.g. some add 0s now folded out that
previously didn't).
This reverts commit 0012b94a4e8e0c757ef0adcd68fb61bb0318b26c.
Reverting due to test failures introduced by 73925ef8b0eacc6792f0e3ea21a3e6d51f5ee8b0
Updated floating-point-compare.ll to keep the assume declaration.
