Summary:
This was originally reported in D62818.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oPH
InstCombine does the opposite fold, in hope that `C l>>/<< Y` expression
will be hoisted out of a loop if `Y` is invariant and `X` is not.
But as it is seen from the diffs here, if it didn't get hoisted,
the produced assembly is almost universally worse.
Much like with my recent "hoist add/sub by/from const" patches,
we should get almost universal win if we hoist constant,
there is almost always an "and/test by imm" instruction,
but "shift of imm" not so much, so we may avoid having to
materialize the immediate, and thus need one less register.
And since we now shift not by constant, but by something else,
the live-range of that something else may reduce.
Special care needs to be applied not to disturb x86 `BT` / hexagon `tstbit`
instruction pattern. And to not get into endless combine loop.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, wuzish, xbolva00, nikic, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, kristof.beyls, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62871
llvm-svn: 366955
If all the demanded elts are from one operand and are inline, then we can use the operand directly.
The changes are mainly from SSE41 targets which has blendvpd but not cmpgtq, allowing the v2i64 comparison to be simplified as we only need the signbit from alternate v4i32 elements.
llvm-svn: 366817
This patch introduces the DAG version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, which attempts to peek through ops (mainly and/or/xor so far) that don't contribute to the demandedbits/elts of a node - which means we can do this even in cases where we have multiple uses of an op, which normally requires us to demanded all bits/elts. The intention is to remove a similar instruction - SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits - once SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits has matured.
The InstCombine version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits can constant fold which I haven't added here yet, and so far I've only wired this up to some basic binops (and/or/xor/add/sub/mul) to demonstrate its use.
We do see a couple of regressions that need to be addressed:
AMDGPU unsigned dot product codegen retains an AND mask (for ZERO_EXTEND) that it previously removed (but otherwise the dotproduct codegen is a lot better).
X86/AVX2 has poor handling of vector ANY_EXTEND/ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG - it prematurely gets converted to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
The code owners have confirmed its ok for these cases to fixed up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63281
llvm-svn: 366799
Summary:
Four things here:
1. Generalize the fold to handle non-splat divisors. Reasonably trivial.
2. Unban power-of-two divisors. I don't see any reason why they should
be illegal.
* There is no ban in Hacker's Delight
* I think the ban came from the same bug that caused the miscompile
in the base patch - in `floor((2^W - 1) / D)` we were dividing by
`D0` instead of `D`, and we **were** ensuring that `D0` is not `1`,
which made sense.
3. Unban `1` divisors. I no longer believe Hacker's Delight actually says
that the fold is invalid for `D = 0`. Further considerations:
* We know that
* `(X u% 1) == 0` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `(X u% 1) != 0` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* Also, we know that
* `X u<= -1` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `X u> -1` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* https://godbolt.org/z/7jnZJXhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/oF6p
* We know will end up with the following:
`(setule/setugt (rotr (mul N, P), K), Q)`
* Therefore, for given new DAG nodes and comparison predicates
(`ule`/`ugt`), we will still produce the correct answer if:
`Q` is a all-ones constant; and both `P` and `K` are *anything*
other than `undef`.
* The fold will indeed produce `Q = all-ones`.
4. Try to re-splat the `P` and `K` vectors - we don't care about
their values for the lanes where divisor was `1`.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hermord, craig.topper, spatel, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63963
llvm-svn: 366637
If we have:
R = sub X, Y
P = cmp Y, X
...then flipping the operands in the compare instruction can allow using a subtract that sets compare flags.
Motivated by diffs in D58875 - not sure if this changes anything there,
but this seems like a good thing independent of that.
There's a more involved version of this transform already in IR (in instcombine
although that seems misplaced to me) - see "swapMayExposeCSEOpportunities()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63958
llvm-svn: 365711
Don't do this locally, computeKnownBits does this better (and can handle non-constant cases as well).
A next step would be to actually simplify non-constant elements - building on what we already do in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.
llvm-svn: 365309
The SDAGBuilder behavior stems from the days when we didn't have fast
math flags available in SDAG. We do now and doing the transformation in
the legalizer has the advantage that it also works for vector types.
llvm-svn: 364743
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
This is a recommit, the original commit rL364563 was reverted in rL364568
because test-suite detected miscompile - the new comparison constant 'Q'
was being computed incorrectly (we divided by `D0` instead of `D`).
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: dexonsmith, kristina, xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364600
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
Original patch author: @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)!
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364563
Change the generic ctpop expansion to more efficiently handle a
check for not-a-power-of-two value:
(ctpop x) != 1 --> (x == 0) || ((x & x-1) != 0)
This is the inverted predicate sibling pattern that was added with:
D63004
This should have been done before I changed IR canonicalization to
favor this form with:
rL364246
...so if this requires revert/changing, the earlier commit may also
need to modified.
llvm-svn: 364319
Simplify ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG if the extended bits are not required.
Matches what we already do for ZERO_EXTEND.
Reapplies rL363850 but now with legality checks added at rL364290
llvm-svn: 364303
This should not cause any visible change in output, but it's
more efficient because we were producing non-canonical 'sub x, 1'
and 'setcc ugt x, 0'. As mentioned in the TODO, we should also
be handling the inverse predicate.
llvm-svn: 364302
Simplify SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG if the extended bits are not required/known zero.
Matches what we already do for SIGN_EXTEND.
Reapplies rL363802 but now with legality checks added at rL364290
llvm-svn: 364299
As part of the fix for rL364264 + rL364272 - limit the *_EXTEND conversion to !TLO.LegalOperations || isOperationLegal cases.
We'll improve X86 legality in future commits.
llvm-svn: 364290
Summary:
This addresses the regression that is being exposed by D50222 in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll`
The missing fold, at least partially, looks trivial:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Zsln
i.e. if we are comparing with zero, and comparing the `urem`-by-non-power-of-two,
and the `urem` is of something that may at most have a single bit set (or no bits set at all),
the `urem` is not needed.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, xbolva00, spatel
Reviewed By: xbolva00, spatel
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63390
llvm-svn: 364286
This reverts the following patches.
"[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG -> ANY/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG"
"[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG -> ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG"
"[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits - add ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG support"
We can end up with an any_extend_vector_inreg with a 256 bit result type
and a 128 bit result type. This is allowed by the ISD opcode, but the
generic operation legalizer is only able to expand cases where the
total vector width is the same.
The X86 backend creates these mismatched cases for zext_vec_inreg/sext_vec_inreg.
The SimplifyDemandedBits changes are allowing those nodes to become
aext_vec_inreg. For the zext/sext cases, the X86 backend has Custom
handling and never lets them get to the generic legalizer. We need to do the same
for aext_vec_inreg.
llvm-svn: 364264
Other than adding consistent demanded elts handling which was a trivial addition, the other differences in functionality will be added in later patches.
llvm-svn: 363713
Other than adding consistent demanded elts handling which was a trivial addition, the other differences in functionality will be added in later patches.
llvm-svn: 363710
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
Most parts of LLVM don't care whether the byval type is derived from an
explicit Attribute or from the parameter's pointee type, so it makes
sense for the main access function to just return the right value.
The very few users who do care (only BitcodeReader so far) can find out
how it's specified by accessing the Attribute directly.
llvm-svn: 362642
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke
LTO. This version fixes that.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362128
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362012
This patch adds the overridable TargetLowering::getTargetConstantFromLoad function which allows targets to return any constant value loaded by a LoadSDNode node - only X86 makes use of this so far but everything should be in place for other targets.
computeKnownBits then uses this function to improve codegen, notably vector code after legalization.
A future commit will do the same for ComputeNumSignBits but computeKnownBits sees the bigger benefit.
This required a couple of fixes:
* SimplifyDemandedBits must early-out for getTargetConstantFromLoad cases to prevent infinite loops of constant regeneration (similar to what we already do for BUILD_VECTOR).
* Fix a DAGCombiner::visitTRUNCATE issue as we had trunc(shl(v8i32),v8i16) <-> shl(trunc(v8i16),v8i32) infinite loops after legalization on AVX512 targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61887
llvm-svn: 361620
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 signed integers with the scale of them provided
as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on them. The
result is saturated and clamped between the largest and smallest representable
values of the first 2 operands.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55720
llvm-svn: 361289
Summary:
The endianess used in the calling convention does not always match the
endianess of the target on all architectures, namely AVR.
When an argument is too large to be legalised by the architecture and is
split for the ABI, a new hook TargetLoweringInfo::shouldSplitFunctionArgumentsAsLittleEndian
is queried to find the endianess that function arguments must be laid
out in.
This approach was recommended by Eli Friedman.
Originally reported in https://github.com/avr-rust/rust/issues/129.
Patch by Carl Peto.
Reviewers: bogner, t.p.northover, RKSimon, niravd, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62003
llvm-svn: 361222
Fixes issue reported by aemerson on D57348. Vector op legalization
support is added for uaddo, usubo, saddo and ssubo (umulo and smulo
were already supported). As usual, by extracting TargetLowering methods
and calling them from vector op legalization.
Vector op legalization doesn't really deal with multiple result nodes,
so I'm explicitly performing a recursive legalization call on the
result value that is not being legalized.
There are some existing test changes because expansion happens
earlier, so we don't get a DAG combiner run in between anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61692
llvm-svn: 361166
Summary:
X86TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint had better support than
TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint for arbitrary depth
getelementpointers for "i", "n", and "s" extended inline assembly
constraints. Hoist its support from the derived class into the base
class.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/469
Reviewers: echristo, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, E5ten, kees, jyknight, nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits, void, craig.topper, nathanchance, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61560
llvm-svn: 360604
