The former is redundant because the later carries it as part of
its builder. Add a getContext() helper method to DialectAsmParser
to make this more convenient, and stop passing the context around
explicitly. This simplifies ODS generated parser hooks for attrs
and types.
This resolves PR51985
Recommit 4b32f8bac4 after fixing a dependency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110796
The former is redundant because the later carries it as part of
its builder. Add a getContext() helper method to DialectAsmParser
to make this more convenient, and stop passing the context around
explicitly. This simplifies ODS generated parser hooks for attrs
and types.
This resolves PR51985
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110796
This revision refactors ElementsAttr into an Attribute Interface.
This enables a common interface with which to interact with
element attributes, without needing to modify the builtin
dialect. It also removes a majority (if not all?) of the need for
the current OpaqueElementsAttr, which was originally intended as
a way to opaquely represent data that was not representable by
the other builtin constructs.
The new ElementsAttr interface not only allows for users to
natively represent their data in the way that best suits them,
it also allows for efficient opaque access and iteration of the
underlying data. Attributes using the ElementsAttr interface
can directly expose support for interacting with the held
elements using any C++ data type they claim to support. For
example, DenseIntOrFpElementsAttr supports iteration using
various native C++ integer/float data types, as well as
APInt/APFloat, and more. ElementsAttr instances that refer to
DenseIntOrFpElementsAttr can use all of these data types for
iteration:
```c++
DenseIntOrFpElementsAttr intElementsAttr = ...;
ElementsAttr attr = intElementsAttr;
for (uint64_t value : attr.getValues<uint64_t>())
...;
for (APInt value : attr.getValues<APInt>())
...;
for (IntegerAttr value : attr.getValues<IntegerAttr>())
...;
```
ElementsAttr also supports failable range/iterator access,
allowing for selective code paths depending on data type
support:
```c++
ElementsAttr attr = ...;
if (auto range = attr.tryGetValues<uint64_t>()) {
for (uint64_t value : *range)
...;
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109190
While the changes are extensive, they basically fall into a few
categories:
1) Moving the TestDialect itself.
2) Updating C++ code in tablegen to explicitly use ::mlir, since it
will be put in a headers that shouldn't expect a 'using'.
3) Updating some generic MLIR Interface definitions to do the same thing.
4) Updating the Tablegen generator in a few places to be explicit about
namespaces
5) Doing the same thing for llvm references, since we no longer pick
up the definitions from mlir/Support/LLVM.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88251
It may be desirable to provide an interface implementation for an attribute or
a type without modifying the definition of said attribute or type. Notably,
this allows to implement interfaces for attributes and types outside of the
dialect that defines them and, in particular, provide interfaces for built-in
types. Provide the mechanism to do so.
Currently, separable registration requires the attribute or type to have been
registered with the context, i.e. for the dialect containing the attribute or
type to be loaded. This can be relaxed in the future using a mechanism similar
to delayed dialect interface registration.
See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-separable-attribute-type-interfaces/3637
Depends On D104233
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104234
This allows for storage instances to store data that isn't uniqued in the context, or contain otherwise non-trivial logic, in the rare situations that they occur. Storage instances with trivial destructors will still have their destructor skipped. A consequence of this is that the storage instance definition must be visible from the place that registers the type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98311
This allows the caller to distinguish between a parse error or an
unmatched keyword. It fixes the redundant error that was emitted by the
caller when the generated parser would fail.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98162
The value type of the attribute can be specified by either overriding the typeBuilder field on the AttrDef, or by providing a parameter of type `AttributeSelfTypeParameter`. This removes the need to define custom storage class constructors for attributes that have a value type other than NoneType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97590
The support for attributes closely maps that of Types (basically 1-1) given that Attributes are defined in exactly the same way as Types. All of the current ODS TypeDef classes get an Attr equivalent. The generation of the attribute classes themselves share the same generator as types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97589
