6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pavel Labath
ca4eddee0d Skip TestTargetXMLArch on non-darwin OSs
This test uses XML packets, but libxml is an optional dependency of
lldb, and this test fails if it is not present.

I'm leaving this enabled on mac, as thats the only platform that's
likely to have libxml always available, but ideally we should have a way
to skip this based on build configuration. I'll see if I can whip
something like that up soon, but for the time being, this unblocks the
buildbots.

llvm-svn: 324870
2018-02-12 09:46:06 +00:00
Jason Molenda
0df8935c23 Looks like this fails when built i386 on linux bots, possible target
arch incompat with spec in file so it's rejected and the test fails.
will look into this later, will be a test case issue not a test issue;
test case may only be valid when lldb is built for/running on an x86_64
system.

llvm-svn: 324795
2018-02-10 01:57:33 +00:00
Jason Molenda
62f395e32e Add test case for x86_64 architecture recognition in the
target.xml packet if it is included.

llvm-svn: 324792
2018-02-10 01:13:34 +00:00
Pavel Labath
014e4654d4 Rewrite the flaky test_restart_bug test in a more deterministic way
Summary:
The test was trying to reproduce a bug in handling of two concurrent
events, which was impossible to do reliably in a black-box style test.
In practice, this meant the test was only ever failing on remote
targets, as these were slow enough to trigger this.

Fortunately, we now have the ability to mock the server side of the
connection, which means we can simulate the failure deterministically,
so I rewrite the test to use the new gdb-client framework.

I've needed to add a couple of new packets to the mock server to be able
to do this. Instead of trying to guess how a "typical" gdb-client test
will want to handle this, I throw an exception in the implementation to
force the user to override them (the packets are only sent if the test
explicitly performs some action which will trigger them, so a basic test
which e.g. does not need the "continue" functionality will not need to
implement them).

Reviewers: owenpshaw

Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42959

llvm-svn: 324590
2018-02-08 10:37:23 +00:00
Pavel Labath
71ad71e530 mock_gdb_server: rectify ack handling code
The mock server was sending acks back in response to spurious acks from
the client, but the client was not prepared to handle these. Most of the
time this would work because the only time the client was sending
unsolicited acks is after the initial connection, and there reply-ack
would get ignored in the "flush all packets from the server" loop which
came after the ack. However, this loop had only a 10ms delay, and
sometimes this was not enough to catch the reply (which meant the
connection got out of sync, and test failed).

Since this behavior not consistent with how lldb-server handles this
situation (it just ignores the ack), I fix the mock server to do the
same.

llvm-svn: 323953
2018-02-01 11:29:06 +00:00
Pavel Labath
1902ffd9a4 [lldb] Generic base for testing gdb-remote behavior
Summary:
Adds new utilities that make it easier to write test cases for lldb acting as a client over a gdb-remote connection.

- A GDBRemoteTestBase class that starts a mock GDB server and provides an easy way to check client packets
- A MockGDBServer that, via MockGDBServerResponder, can be made to issue server responses that test client behavior.
- Utility functions for handling common data encoding/decoding
- Utility functions for creating dummy targets from YAML files

----

Split from the review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145, which was a new feature that necessitated the new testing capabilities.

Reviewers: clayborg, labath

Reviewed By: clayborg, labath

Subscribers: hintonda, davide, jingham, krytarowski, mgorny, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42195
Patch by Owen Shaw <llvm@owenpshaw.net>

llvm-svn: 323636
2018-01-29 10:02:40 +00:00