Use the new -fexperimental-strict-floating-point flag in more cases to
fix the arm and aarch64 bots.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80952
We currently have strict floating point/constrained floating point enabled
for all targets. Constrained SDAG nodes get converted to the regular ones
before reaching the target layer. In theory this should be fine.
However, the changes are exposed to users through multiple clang options
already in use in the field, and the changes are _completely_ _untested_
on almost all of our targets. Bugs have already been found, like
"https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45274".
This patch disables constrained floating point options in clang everywhere
except X86 and SystemZ. A warning will be printed when this happens.
Use the new -fexperimental-strict-floating-point flag to force allowing
strict floating point on hosts that aren't already marked as supporting
it (X86 and SystemZ).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80952
My mistake, I had a blocking reviewer.
This reverts commit 39d2ae0afb2312a15e4d15a0855b35b4e1c49fc4.
This reverts commit bfdafa32a0fa4b2745627fe57dd253db10ac3fcf.
This reverts commit 2b35511350454dd22997f129ee529e3fdb129ac2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80952
Mark these tests as only failing on PowerPC. Avoids unexpected passes on
other bots.
Fingers crossed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80952
Update the IRBuilder to generate constrained FP comparisons in
CreateFCmp when IsFPConstrained is true, similar to the other
places in the IRBuilder.
Also, add a new CreateFCmpS to emit signaling FP comparisons,
and use it in clang where comparisons are supposed to be signaling
(currently, only when emitting code for the <, <=, >, >= operators).
Note that there is currently no way to add fast-math flags to a
constrained FP comparison, since this is implemented as an intrinsic
call that returns a boolean type, and FMF are only allowed for calls
returning a floating-point type. However, given the discussion around
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42179, it seems that FCmp itself
really shouldn't have any FMF either, so this is probably OK.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71467
