`build()` guarantees that we'll always have a `Decl`, so we can simplify the code.
Reviewed By: ymandel, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156859
When introducing this new overload in https://reviews.llvm.org/D151183, I didn't consider that the `ASTContext` parameter was unnecessary because it could also be obtained from the `FunctionDecl`.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151549
This is the most common use case, so it makes sense to have a specific overload for it.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151183
Attempting to analyze templated code doesn't have a good cost-benefit ratio. We
have so far done a best-effort attempt at this, but maintaining this support has
an ongoing high maintenance cost because the AST for templates can violate a lot
of the invariants that otherwise hold for the AST of concrete code. As just one
example, in concrete code the operand of a UnaryOperator '*' is always a prvalue
(https://godbolt.org/z/s3e5xxMd1), but in templates this isn't true
(https://godbolt.org/z/6W9xxGvoM).
Further rationale for not analyzing templates:
* The semantics of a template itself are weakly defined; semantics can depend
strongly on the concrete template arguments. Analyzing the template itself (as
opposed to an instantiation) therefore has limited value.
* Analyzing templates requires a lot of special-case code that isn't necessary
for concrete code because dependent types are hard to deal with and the AST
violates invariants that otherwise hold for concrete code (see above).
* There's precedent in that neither Clang Static Analyzer nor the flow-sensitive
warnings in Clang (such as uninitialized variables) support analyzing
templates.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150352
Keeping this false could end up with extra iterations on a lot of loops
that aren't real ones (e.g. they could be a do-while-false for macros),
and makes the analyses very slow.
This patch changes the default for
CFG::BuildOptions.PruneTriviallyFalseEdges to true to avoid it.
Reviewed By: ymandel, xazax.hun, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149640
The crash happened because the transfer fucntion for `&&` and `||`
unconditionally tried to retrieve the value of the RHS. However, if the RHS
is unreachable, there is no environment for it, and trying to retrieve the
operand's value causes an assertion failure.
See also the comments in the code for further details.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, ymandel, sgatev, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146514
std::optional::value() has undesired exception checking semantics and is
unavailable in older Xcode (see _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS). The
call sites block std::optional migration.
This makes `ninja check-clang` work in the absence of llvm::Optional::value.
This patch modifies context-sensitive analysis of functions to use a cache,
rather than recreate the `ControlFlowContext` from a function decl on each
encounter. However, this is just step 1 (of N) in adding support for a
configurable map of "modeled" function decls (see issue #56879). The map will go
from the actual function decl to the `ControlFlowContext` used to model it. Only
functions pre-configured in the map will be modeled in a context-sensitive way.
We start with a cache because it introduces the desired map, while retaining the
current behavior. Here, functions are mapped to their actual implementations
(when available).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131039
This will be necessary later when we add support for evaluating logic
expressions such as && and ||.
This is part of the implementation of the dataflow analysis framework.
See "[RFC] A dataflow analysis framework for Clang AST" on cfe-dev.
Reviewed-by: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119447
This is part of the implementation of the dataflow analysis framework.
See "[RFC] A dataflow analysis framework for Clang AST" on cfe-dev.
Reviewed-by: ymandel, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117123
This is part of the implementation of the dataflow analysis framework.
See "[RFC] A dataflow analysis framework for Clang AST" on cfe-dev.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116022
