During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Drive-by fixes c++1z -> c++17 and c++2a -> c++20 when seen.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149553
This patch prefixes omp outlined helpers and reduction funcs
with the original function's name.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140722
This patch attempts to prefix omp outlined helpers and reduction funcs
with the original function's name.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140722
marked as 'not executed'.
In the current coverage mapping implementation, we terminate the current region
and start a zero region when we hit a nonreturn function. However, for logical OR,
the second operand is not executed if the first operand evaluates to true. If the
nonreturn function is called in the right side of logical OR and the left side of
logical OR is TRUE, we should not start a zero `GapRegionCounter`. This will also
apply to `VisitAbstractConditionalOperator`.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59030
Reviewed By: zequanwu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144371
Since we decided to remove the support for `-fcoroutines-ts` in
clang/llvm17 and the clang16/llvm16 is branched. So we're going to
remove the `-fcoroutines-ts` option.
Originally, the following commit removed mapping coverage regions for system headers:
93205af066
It might be viable and useful to collect coverage from system headers in some systems.
This patch adds --system-headers-coverage option (disabled by default) to enable
collecting coverage from system headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143304
This is a reland of https://reviews.llvm.org/D122336.
Original patch caused a problem in collecting coverage in
Fuchsia because it was returning early without putting unused
function names into __llvm_prf_names section. This patch
fixes that issue.
The original commit message is as the following:
CoverageMappingModuleGen generates a coverage mapping record
even for unused functions with internal linkage, e.g.
static int foo() { return 100; }
Clang frontend eliminates such functions, but InstrProfiling pass
still emits runtime hook since there is a coverage record.
Fuchsia uses runtime counter relocation, and pulling in profile
runtime for unused functions causes a linker error:
undefined hidden symbol: __llvm_profile_counter_bias.
Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061, we do not hook profile
runtime for the binaries that none of its translation units
have been instrumented in Fuchsia. This patch extends that for
the instrumented binaries that consist of only unused functions.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122336
Clang crashes when encountering an `if consteval` statement.
This is the minimum fix not to crash.
The fix is consistent with the current behavior of if constexpr,
which does generate coverage data for the discarded branches.
This is of course not correct and a better solution is
needed for both if constexpr and if consteval.
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54419.
Fixes#57377
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132723
I noticed these two tests emit a warning about a missing
unhandled_exception. That's irrelevant to what is being tested, but
is unnecessary noise.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125535
CoverageMappingModuleGen generates a coverage mapping record
even for unused functions with internal linkage, e.g.
static int foo() { return 100; }
Clang frontend eliminates such functions, but InstrProfiling pass
still pulls in profile runtime since there is a coverage record.
Fuchsia uses runtime counter relocation, and pulling in profile
runtime for unused functions causes a linker error:
undefined hidden symbol: __llvm_profile_counter_bias.
Since 389dc94d4be7, we do not hook profile runtime for the binaries
that none of its translation units have been instrumented in Fuchsia.
This patch extends that for the instrumented binaries that
consist of only unused functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122336
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the fifth batch of tests being updated (there are a significant
number of other tests left to be updated).
Note, the behavior of -ast-print is broken. It prints functions with a
prototype (void) as if they have no prototype () in C. Some tests need
to disable strict prototype checking when recompiling the results of an
-ast-print invocation.
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
This reverts commit 2fbd254aa46b, which broke the libc++ CI. I'm reverting
to get things stable again until we've figured out a way forward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Summary: Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are
defined in std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
But move the coroutine component into the std namespace may be an break
change. So I planned to split this change into two patch. One in clang
and other in libcxx.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace and emit a warning in this case. So the existing codes
wouldn't be break after update compiler.
Test Plan: check-clang, check-libcxx
Reviewed By: lxfind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.
This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.
Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753
We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.
This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.
Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753
Clang usually propagates counter mapping region for conditions of `if`, `while`,
`for`, etc from parent counter. We should do the same for condition of conditional operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95918
This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating conditions are taken (evaluate to TRUE)
and not taken (evaluate to FALSE). Individual conditions may comprise larger
boolean expressions using boolean logical operators. This functionality is
very similar to what is supported by GCOV except that it is very closely
anchored to the ASTs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84467
This casued assertions during Chromium builds. See comment on the code review
> Bug filled here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45757.
> Add comment to skipped regions so we don't track execution count for lines containing only comments.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84208
This reverts commit abd45154bdb6b76c5b480455eacc8c75b08242aa and the
follow-up 87d725473380652bbe845fd2fbd9c0507a55172f.
Summary:
D82928 generated unexpected tmp files in the CoverageMapping test directory. This patch cleans it up and remove the file in the test bots.
It will be revered after a week.
Reviewers: thakis
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82992
Summary: The test file in D82928 generated temp files within the test directory, causing test failures. Fix it.
Reviewers: modocache, fhahn
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82986
Summary:
Previously, source-based coverage analysis does not work properly for coroutine.
This patch adds processing of coroutine body and co_return in the coverage analysis, so that we can handle them properly.
For coroutine body, we should only look at the actual function body and ignore the compiler-generated things; for co_return, we need to terminate the region similar to return statement.
Added a test, and confirms that it now works properly. (without this patch, the statement after the if statement will be treated wrongly)
Reviewers: lewissbaker, modocache, junparser
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82928
Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).
---
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
