This PR adds the processor definition for XiangShan-NanHu, an
open-source high-performance RISC-V processor.
According to the official
[documentation](https://xiangshan-doc.readthedocs.io/zh-cn/latest/arch/),
NanHu core supports
`RV64IMAFDC_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zksed_zksh_svinval`.
I found that NanHu also supports `zicbom` and `zicboz`. You can find
them in the [source
code](5931ace353/src/main/scala/xiangshan/backend/decode/DecodeUnit.scala (L426-L436)).
Features supported by NanHu have been confirmed by @poemonsense.
---------
Co-authored-by: SForeKeeper <zkliu6@gmail.com>
In [1], a few new insns are proposed to expand BPF ISA to
. fixing the limitation of existing insn (e.g., 16bit jmp offset)
. adding new insns which may improve code quality
(sign_ext_ld, sign_ext_mov, st)
. feature complete (sdiv, smod)
. better user experience (bswap)
This patch implemented insn encoding for
. sign-extended load
. sign-extended mov
. sdiv/smod
. bswap insns
. unconditional jump with 32bit offset
The new bswap insns are generated under cpu=v4 for __builtin_bswap.
For cpu=v3 or earlier, for __builtin_bswap, be or le insns are generated
which is not intuitive for the user.
To support 32-bit branch offset, a 32-bit ja (JMPL) insn is implemented.
For conditional branch which is beyond 16-bit offset, llvm will do
some transformation 'cond_jmp' -> 'cond_jmp + jmpl' to simulate 32bit
conditional jmp. See BPFMIPeephole.cpp for details. The algorithm is
hueristic based. I have tested bpf selftest pyperf600 with unroll account
600 which can indeed generate 32-bit jump insn, e.g.,
13: 06 00 00 00 9b cd 00 00 gotol +0xcd9b <LBB0_6619>
Eduard is working on to add 'st' insn to cpu=v4.
A list of llc flags:
disable-ldsx, disable-movsx, disable-bswap,
disable-sdiv-smod, disable-gotol
can be used to disable a particular insn for cpu v4.
For example, user can do:
llc -march=bpf -mcpu=v4 -disable-movsx t.ll
to enable cpu v4 without movsx insns.
References:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4bfe98be-5333-1c7e-2f6d-42486c8ec039@meta.com/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144829
The Ampere1A core improves on the Ampere1 with key differences being:
* memory tagging is supported
* SM3/SM4 are supported
* adds a new fusion pair for (A+B+1 and A-B-1)
(added in a later commit)
Depends on D142395
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142396
SCR1 is available at https://github.com/syntacore/scr1
'syntacore-scr1-base' corresponds to SCR1_CFG_RV32IC_BASE,
'syntacore-scr1-max' corresponds to SCR1_CFG_RV32IMC_MAX.
SCR1_CFG_RV32EC_MIN is RV32EC, which is currently unsupported.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139302
This simplifies the code by avoiding some special cases for family names
(as opposed to device names).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137520
This adds AArch64 TargetParser support to define CPU aliases, and
ports the definition of Grace over to that. This is following up
on D136425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136611
They're roughly ARMv8.6. This works in the .td file, but in
AArch64TargetParser.def, marking them v8.6 brings in support for the SM4
cryptographic hash and we don't actually have that. So TargetParser side
they're marked as v8.5, with the extra features (BF16 and I8MM added manually).
Finally, A16 supports the HCX extension in addition to v8.6. This has no
TargetParser implications.
The previous implementation translated from names like sifive-7-series
to sifive-7-rv32 or sifive-7-rv64. This also required sifive-7-rv32
and sifive-7-rv64 to be valid CPU names. As those are not real
CPUs it doesn't make sense to accept them in -mcpu.
This patch does away with the translation and adds sifive-7-series
directly to RISCV.td. Removing sifive-7-rv32 and sifive-7-rv64.
sifive-7-series is only allowed in -mtune.
I've also added "rocket" to RISCV.td but have not removed rocket-rv32
or rocket-rv64.
To prevent -mcpu=sifive-7-series or -mcpu=rocket being used with llc,
I've added a Feature32Bit to all rv32 CPUs. And made it an error to
have an rv32 triple without Feature32Bit. sifive-7-series and rocket
do not have Feature32Bit or Feature64Bit set so the user would need
to provide -mattr=+32bit or -mattr=+64bit along with the -mcpu to
avoid the error.
SiFive no longer names their newer products with 3, 5, or 7 series.
Instead we have p200 series, x200 series, p500 series, and p600 series.
Following the previous behavior would require a sifive-p500-rv32 and
sifive-p500-rv64 in order to support -mtune=sifive-p500-series. There
is currently no p500 product, but it could start getting confusing if
there was in the future.
I'm open to hearing alternatives for how to achieve my main goal
of removing sifive-7-rv32/rv64 as a CPU name.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131708
This patch adds support for Arm's Cortex-M85 CPU. The Cortex-M85 CPU is
an Arm v8.1m Mainline CPU, with optional support for MVE and PACBTI,
both of which are enabled by default.
Parts have been coauthored by by Mark Murray, Alexandros Lamprineas and
David Green.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128415
Add support for the Ampere Computing Ampere1 core.
Ampere1 implements the AArch64 state and is compatible with ARMv8.6-A.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117112
This is the first patch of a series to upstream support for the new
subtarget.
Contributors:
Jay Foad <jay.foad@amd.com>
Konstantin Zhuravlyov <kzhuravl_dev@outlook.com>
Patch 1/N for upstreaming AMDGPU gfx11 architectures.
Reviewed By: foad, kzhuravl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124536
The recently announced IBM z16 processor implements the architecture
already supported as "arch14" in LLVM. This patch adds support for
"z16" as an alternate architecture name for arch14.
The support for neoverse-512tvb mirrors the same option available in GCC[1].
There is no functional effect for this option yet.
This patch ensures the driver accepts "-mcpu=neoverse-512tvb", and enough
plumbing is in place to allow the new option to be used in the future.
[1]https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AArch64-Options.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112406
