Reapplication of 7339c0f782d5c70e0928f8991b0c05338a90c84c with a fix
for a crash involving arrays without a size expression.
Clang supports VLAs in C++ as an extension, but we currently only warn
on their use when you pass -Wvla, -Wvla-extension, or -pedantic.
However, VLAs as they're expressed in C have been considered by WG21
and rejected, are easy to use accidentally to the surprise of users
(e.g., https://ddanilov.me/default-non-standard-features/), and they
have potential security implications beyond constant-size arrays
(https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ARR32-C.+Ensure+size+arguments+for+variable+length+arrays+are+in+a+valid+range).
C++ users should strongly consider using other functionality such as
std::vector instead.
This seems like sufficiently compelling evidence to warn users about
VLA use by default in C++ modes. This patch enables the -Wvla-extension
diagnostic group in C++ language modes by default, and adds the warning
group to -Wall in GNU++ language modes. The warning is still opt-in in
C language modes, where support for VLAs is somewhat less surprising to
users.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-diagnosing-use-of-vlas-in-c/73109
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156565
We used to have two separate implementations to derive the number of
threads used in a target region. This lead us to sometimes miss out on
user provided thread bounds (num_threads, or thread_limit) when we
looked for "constant default values". If we might miss out on the
presence of those bounds, we cannot set the thread_limit statically
since the runtime will try to honor user input rather than cap it at the
"preferred default". This patch replaces the secondary implementation
with the primary in a mode that will not emit code but just look for the
presence, and potentially upper bounds, of thread limiting clauses.
The runtime test would not pass without this rewrite as we missed some
clauses, set the static limit on the device to the preferred value, but
then violated that value at runtime.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64845
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158381
This allows use with non-0 address space stacks. llvm_ptr_ty should
never be used. This could use some more percolation up through mlir,
but this is enough to fix existing tests.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D156666
The itanium ABI for certain platforms requires a minimum alignments for
member function pointers to reserve certain bits for distinguishing
virtual and non-virtual functions.
Our implementation of this however depends on the alignment of the
function involved, which may however not reflect the true alignment of
function pointers on certain targets for which the alignment is
independent of the function (e.g. AIX). Worse, the 2-byte alignment
we use may be less than the ABI minimum for the target, and in the case
we are using explicit sections will result in invalid codegen.
This patch attempts to correct this situation by considering the target
alignment of function pointers as part of making the decision about
whether we need to adjust the function alignment to conform to the ABI.
Targets which do not provide the function ptr alignment information
will return a value of 1 when queried and will conservatively retain
the old alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147184
The loop directive is a descriptive construct which allows the compiler
flexibility in how it generates code for the directive's associated
loop(s). See OpenMP specification 5.2 [257:8-9].
Codegen added in this patch for the combined 'loop' directives are:
'target teams loop' -> 'target teams distribute parallel for'
'teams loop' -> 'teams distribute parallel for'
'target parallel loop' -> 'target parallel for'
'parallel loop' -> 'parallel for'
NOTE: The implementation of the 'loop' directive itself is unchanged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145823
