This is the last PR that's needed (for now) to get libc++'s tests
working with MSVC's STL.
The ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS machinery is very useful, but also very
problematic for MSVC, as it doesn't understand most of Clang's compiler
options. We've been dealing with this by simply marking anything that
uses ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS as FAIL or SKIPPED, but that creates
significant gaps in test coverage.
Fortunately, ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS also supports "features", which
can be slightly enhanced to send Clang-compatible and MSVC-compatible
options to the right compilers.
This patch adds the gcc-style-warnings and cl-style-warnings Lit features,
and uses that to pass the appropriate warning flags to tests. It also uses
TEST_MEOW_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORED for a few local suppressions of MSVC
warnings.
This reverts commit 491b2810fb7fe5f080fa9c4f5945ed0a6909dc92.
This change broke valid code and generated incorrect diagnostics, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
This patch makes clang diagnose extensive cases of consteval if and is_constant_evaluated usage that are tautologically true or false.
This introduces a new IsRuntimeEvaluated boolean flag to Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that means the immediate appearance of if consteval or is_constant_evaluated are tautologically false(e.g. inside if !consteval {} block or non-constexpr-qualified function definition body)
This patch also pushes new expression evaluation context when parsing the condition of if constexpr and initializer of constexpr variables so that Sema can be aware that the use of consteval if and is_consteval are tautologically true in if constexpr condition and constexpr variable initializers.
BEFORE this patch, the warning for is_constant_evaluated was emitted from constant evaluator. This patch moves the warning logic to Sema in order to diagnose tautological use of is_constant_evaluated in the same way as consteval if.
This patch separates initializer evaluation context from InitializerScopeRAII.
This fixes a bug that was happening when user takes address of function address in initializers of non-local variables.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43760
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51567
Reviewed By: cor3ntin, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
GCC 13 has added __is_convertible(), so we don't need to keep the fallback implementation around.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157939
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using SFINAE,
but this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153980
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Note since we use clang-tidy 16 a small work-around is needed. Clang
knows -std=c++23 but clang-tidy not so for now force the lit compiler
flag to use -std=c++2b instead of -std=c++23.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, jloser, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150795
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intptr_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146643
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
We pretty consistently don't define those cause they are not needed,
and it removes the potential pitfall to think that these tests are
being run. This doesn't touch .compile.fail.cpp tests since those
should be replaced by .verify.cpp tests anyway, and there would be
a lot to fix up.
As a fly-by, I also fixed a bit of formatting, removed a few unused
includes and made some very minor, clearly NFC refactorings such as
in allocator.traits/allocator.traits.members/allocate.verify.cpp where
the old test basically made no sense the way it was written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146236
Currently, there are bugs in Clang's intrinsics for type traits when
handling Objective-C++ `id` (e.g. in `add_pointer`). As a temporary
workaround, don't use these intrinsics in the Objective-C++ mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145186
There are no tests for the aliases because clang doesn't diagnose deprecated template aliases currently.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127678
The lowercase `__ppc64__` is not defined by non-darwin powerpc64 GCC, therefore
it lures users to write code which is not portable to GCC. Migrate to
`__powerpc64__` in preparation for undefining `__ppc64__`. `__powerpc64__` is
much more common than `__PPC64__`.
Update alignment_of.pass.cpp to use 1 unconditionally:
on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu `alignof(bool) = _Alignof(bool) = __alignof(bool) = 1`.
The value 4 might be derived from an ancient Clang.
Change is_iec559 to true when long double uses uses IEEE 754 quadruple or double
precision (i.e. not ibm128).
Reviewed By: #libc, thesamesam, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137513
GCC expands the pointer type in this conditional expression even for
template types _Up that are not arrays. This raises an error when
std::decay<> is used with reference types (as is done in LLVM's
sources). Using add_pointer<> causes GCC to only instantiate a
pointer type for array types.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135469
Replace the two-level implementation with a simpler one that directly subclasses
the predicates, avoiding the instantiation of the template to get the `type`
member in a situation where we should short-circuit. This prevents incorrect
diagnostics when the instantiated predicate contains a static assertion.
Add a test case that reproduced the previous problem. The existing test case
involving `HasNoValue` didn't catch the problem because `HasNoValue` was in the
final position. The bug comes up when the predicate that shouldn't be
instantiated is after the short-circuit position but there is more to follow,
because then `__conjunction_impl<False, BadPredicate, ...>` instantiates
`__conjunction_impl<BadPredicate, ...>` (in order to obtain its `type` member),
which in turn instantiates `BadPredicate` in order to obtain its `value` member.
In contrast the new implementation doesn't recurse in instantiation any further
than it needs to, because it doesn't require particular members of the recursive
case.
I've also updated the test cases for `std::disjunction` to match,
although it doesn't have the same particular bug (its implementation is
quite different).
Fixes#58490.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Spies: philnik, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136318
Many tests in `libcxx/test/std/strings` use
`#if defined(__cpp_lib_char8_t) && __cpp_lib_char8_t >= 201811L`
which can be replaced with the more terse `#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_CHAR8_T`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132626
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Clang 3.7 and below is not actively used or supported in the test suite now, so
remove the workaround in the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126603
This fixes incorrect handling of non-moveable types, adding tests for this case.
See [issue 55346](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55346).
The current implementation is based on is_convertible, which is
[defined](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/meta.rel#5) in terms of
validity of the following function:
```
To test() {
return declval<From>();
}
```
But this doesn't work if To and From are both some non-moveable type, which the
[definition](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/conv#3) of implicit
conversions says should work due to guaranteed copy elision:
```
To to = E; // E has type From
```
It is this latter definition that is used in the
[definition](https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/function.objects#func.require-2)
of INVOKE<R>. Make __invokable_r use __is_core_convertible, which
captures the ability to use guaranteed copy elision, making the
definition correct for non-moveable types.
Fixesllvm/llvm-project#55346.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Spies: EricWF, jloser, ldionne, philnik, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125300
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
All supported compilers have implemented this feature.
Therefore use the language version instead of the feature macro.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119865
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
This reverts commit 859ebca744e634dcc89a2294ffa41574f947bd62.
The change contained many unrelated changes and e.g. restored
unit test failes for the old lld port.
This reverts commit 640beb38e7710b939b3cfb3f4c54accc694b1d30.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
At this point, every supported compiler that claims a -std=c++17 mode
should also support these features.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113436
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
