This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
This commit provides linker support for Cortex-M Security Extensions (CMSE).
The specification for this feature can be found in ARM v8-M Security Extensions:
Requirements on Development Tools.
The linker synthesizes a security gateway veneer in a special section;
`.gnu.sgstubs`, when it finds non-local symbols `__acle_se_<entry>` and `<entry>`,
defined relative to the same text section and having the same address. The
address of `<entry>` is retargeted to the starting address of the
linker-synthesized security gateway veneer in section `.gnu.sgstubs`.
In summary, the linker translates input:
```
.text
entry:
__acle_se_entry:
[entry_code]
```
into:
```
.section .gnu.sgstubs
entry:
SG
B.W __acle_se_entry
.text
__acle_se_entry:
[entry_code]
```
If addresses of `__acle_se_<entry>` and `<entry>` are not equal, the linker
considers that `<entry>` already defines a secure gateway veneer so does not
synthesize one.
If `--out-implib=<out.lib>` is specified, the linker writes the list of secure
gateway veneers into a CMSE import library `<out.lib>`. The CMSE import library
will have 3 sections: `.symtab`, `.strtab`, `.shstrtab`. For every secure gateway
veneer <entry> at address `<addr>`, `.symtab` contains a `SHN_ABS` symbol `<entry>` with
value `<addr>`.
If `--in-implib=<in.lib>` is specified, the linker reads the existing CMSE import
library `<in.lib>` and preserves the entry function addresses in the resulting
executable and new import library.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139092
This reverts commit 9246df7049b0bb83743f860caff4221413c63de2.
Reason: This patch broke the UBSan buildbots. See more information in
the original phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139092
This reverts commit c4fea3905617af89d1ad87319893e250f5b72dd6.
I am reverting this for now until I figure out how to fix
the build bot errors and warnings.
Errors:
llvm-project/lld/ELF/Arch/ARM.cpp:1300:29: error: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token
osec->writeHeaderTo<ELFT>(++sHdrs);
Warnings:
llvm-project/lld/ELF/Arch/ARM.cpp:1306:31: warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
This commit provides linker support for Cortex-M Security Extensions (CMSE).
The specification for this feature can be found in ARM v8-M Security Extensions:
Requirements on Development Tools.
The linker synthesizes a security gateway veneer in a special section;
`.gnu.sgstubs`, when it finds non-local symbols `__acle_se_<entry>` and `<entry>`,
defined relative to the same text section and having the same address. The
address of `<entry>` is retargeted to the starting address of the
linker-synthesized security gateway veneer in section `.gnu.sgstubs`.
In summary, the linker translates input:
```
.text
entry:
__acle_se_entry:
[entry_code]
```
into:
```
.section .gnu.sgstubs
entry:
SG
B.W __acle_se_entry
.text
__acle_se_entry:
[entry_code]
```
If addresses of `__acle_se_<entry>` and `<entry>` are not equal, the linker
considers that `<entry>` already defines a secure gateway veneer so does not
synthesize one.
If `--out-implib=<out.lib>` is specified, the linker writes the list of secure
gateway veneers into a CMSE import library `<out.lib>`. The CMSE import library
will have 3 sections: `.symtab`, `.strtab`, `.shstrtab`. For every secure gateway
veneer <entry> at address `<addr>`, `.symtab` contains a `SHN_ABS` symbol `<entry>` with
value `<addr>`.
If `--in-implib=<in.lib>` is specified, the linker reads the existing CMSE import
library `<in.lib>` and preserves the entry function addresses in the resulting
executable and new import library.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139092
Arm has BE8 big endian configuration called a byte-invariant(every byte has the same address on little and big-endian systems).
When in BE8 mode:
1. Instructions are big-endian in relocatable objects but
little-endian in executables and shared objects.
2. Data is big-endian.
3. The data encoding of the ELF file is ELFDATA2MSB.
To support BE8 without an ABI break for relocatable objects,the linker takes on the responsibility of changing the endianness of instructions. At a high level the only difference between BE32 and BE8 in the linker is that for BE8:
1. The linker sets the flag EF_ARM_BE8 in the ELF header.
2. The linker endian reverses the instructions, but not data.
This patch adds BE8 big endian support for Arm. To endian reverse the instructions we'll need access to the mapping symbols. Code sections can contain a mix of Arm, Thumb and literal data. We need to endian reverse Arm instructions as words, Thumb instructions
as half-words and ignore literal data.The only way to find these transitions precisely is by using mapping symbols. The instruction reversal will need to take place after relocation. For Arm BE8 code sections (Section has SHF_EXECINSTR flag ) we inserted a step after relocation to endian reverse the instructions. The implementation strategy i have used here is to write all sections BE32 including SyntheticSections then endian reverse all code in InputSections via mapping symbols.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150870
Changes:
- Adding BE32 big endian Support for Arm.
- Replace the writele and readle with their endian-aware versions.
- Adding test cases for the big-endian be32 arm configuration.
Patch by: Milosz Plichta. This patch merges all the changes from
this patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D140203 as well.
Reviewed By: peter.smith, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140202
Change:
- Replacing the memcpy that assume little endian with the endian-aware write.
Shouldn't affect the output for now, just a prerequisite for the next patches.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140201
changes:
- BLX: The Arm architecture versions that support the branch and link
instruction (BLX), can rewrite BLs in place when a state change from Arm<->Thumb
is required. Armv4T does not have BLX and so needs thunks for state changes.
- v4T Thumb long branches needed their own thunk. We could have used the v6M
implementation, but v6M doesn't have Arm state and must resolve to rather
inefficient stack reshuffling. We also can't reuse v7 thumb thunks as they use
MOVV/MOVT, which wasn't available yet for v4T.
- Remove the `lack of BLX' warning. LLVM only supports Arm Architecture versions
upwards of v4, which we now all support in LLD.
- renamed existing thunks to better reflect their use:
ARMV5ABSLongThunk -> ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk,
ARMV5PILongThunk -> ARMV4PILongThunk
- removed isCompatibleWith method from ARMV5ABSLongThunk and ARMV5PILongThunk,
as they were identical to the ARMThunk parent class implementation.
Support for (efficient) position independent thunks for v4T will be added in a
follow-up patch, including possible related thunk renaming and code comment
cleanup.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139888
Currently, LLD does not support the complete set of ARM group relocations.
Given that I intend to start using these in the Linux kernel [0], let's add
support for these.
This implements the group processing as documented in the ELF psABI. Notably,
this means support is dropped for very far symbol references that also carry a
small component, where the immediate is rotated in such a way that only part of
it wraps to the other end of the 32-bit word. To me, it seems unlikely that
this is something anyone could be relying on, but of course I could be wrong.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211122092816.2865873-8-ardb@kernel.org/
Reviewed By: peter.smith, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114172
This change implements support for R_ARM_THM_JUMP8 relocation in
addition to R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 which is already supported by LLD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21225
Many diagnostics use `getErrorPlace` or `getErrorLocation` to report a location.
In the presence of line table debug information, `getErrorPlace` uses a source
file location and ignores the object file location. However, the object file
location is sometimes more useful.
This patch changes "undefined symbol" and "out of range" diagnostics to report
both object/source file locations. Other diagnostics can use similar format if
needed.
The key idea is to let `InputSectionBase::getLocation` report the object file
location and use `getSrcMsg` for source file/line information. `getSrcMsg`
doesn't leverage `STT_FILE` information yet, but I think the temporary lack of
the functionality is ok.
For the ARM "branch and link relocation" diagnostic, I arbitrarily place the
source file location at the end of the line. The diagnostic is not very common
so its formatting doesn't need to be pretty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112518
Most architectures use .got instead of .got.plt, so switching the default can
minimize customization.
This fixes an issue for SPARC V9 which uses .got .
AVR, AMDGPU, and MSP430 don't seem to use _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.
There used to be many cases where addends for Elf_Rel were not emitted in
the final object file (mostly when building for MIPS64 since the input .o
files use RELA but the output uses REL). These cases have been fixed since,
but this patch adds a check to ensure that the written values are correct.
It is based on a previous patch that I added to the CHERI fork of LLD since
we were using MIPS64 as a baseline. The work has now almost entirely
shifted to RISC-V and Arm Morello (which use Elf_Rela), but I thought
it would be useful to upstream our local changes anyway.
This patch adds a (hidden) command line flag --check-dynamic-relocations
that can be used to enable these checks. It is also on by default in
assertions builds for targets that handle all dynamic relocations kinds
that LLD can emit in Target::getImplicitAddend(). Currently this is
enabled for ARM, MIPS, and I386.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101450
In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently
executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in
Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by
subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this
will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state.
The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this
implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were
to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double
counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers
wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias.
In certain situations such as:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305
the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular
normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm
thunks did not store the addend.
The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in
normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think
it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so
that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I
wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the
Relocations.cpp code is simpler now.
In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel
build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example
that I could build up from scratch.
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
The scope of R_TLS (TP offset relocation types (TPREL/TPOFF) used for the
local-exec TLS model) is actually narrower than its name may imply. R_TLS_NEG
is only used by Solaris R_386_TLS_LE_32.
Rename them so that they will be less confusing.
Reviewed By: grimar, psmith, rprichard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93467
Follow-up to D82899. Note, we need to disable R_DTPREL relaxation
because ARM psABI does not define TLS relaxation.
Reviewed By: grimar, psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83138
See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140549.html
For the record, GNU ld changed to 64k max page size in 2014
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=7572ca8989ead4c3425a1500bc241eaaeffa2c89
"[RFC] ld/ARM: Increase maximum page size to 64kB"
Android driver forced 4k page size in AArch64 (D55029) and ARM (D77746).
A binary linked with max-page-size=4096 does not run on a system with a
higher page size configured. There are some systems out there that do
this and it leads to the binary getting `Killed!` by the kernel.
In the non-linker-script cases, when linked with -z noseparate-code
(default), the max-page-size increase should not cause any size
difference. There may be some VMA usage differences, though.
Reviewed By: psmith, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77330
The R_ARM_ALU_PC_G0 and R_ARM_LDR_PC_G0 relocations are used by the
ADR and LDR pseudo instructions, and are the basis of the group
relocations that can load an arbitrary constant via a series of add, sub
and ldr instructions.
The relocations need to be obtained via the .reloc directive.
R_ARM_ALU_PC_G0 is much more complicated as the add/sub instruction uses
a modified immediate encoding of an 8-bit immediate rotated right by an
even 4-bit field. This means that the range of representable immediates
is sparse. We extract the encoding and decoding functions for the modified
immediate from llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMAddressingModes.h as
this header file is not accessible from LLD. Duplication of code isn't
ideal, but as these are well-defined mathematical functions they are
unlikely to change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75349
MC will now output the R_ARM_THM_PC8, R_ARM_THM_PC12 and
R_ARM_THM_PREL_11_0 relocations. These are short-ranged relocations that
are used to implement the adr rd, literal and ldr rd, literal pseudo
instructions.
The instructions use a new RelExpr called R_ARM_PCA in order to calculate
the required S + A - Pa expression, where Pa is AlignDown(P, 4) as the
instructions add their immediate to AlignDown(PC, 4). We also do not want
these relocations to generate or resolve against a PLT entry as the range
of these relocations is so short they would never reach.
The R_ARM_THM_PC8 has a special encoding convention for the relocation
addend, the immediate field is unsigned, yet the addend must be -4 to
account for the Thumb PC bias. The ABI (not the architecture) uses the
convention that the 8-byte immediate of 0xff represents -4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75042
With this patch lld recognizes ARM SBREL relocations.
R_ARM*_MOVW_BREL relocations are not tested because they are not used.
Patch by Tamas Petz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74604
Recommit of 0b4a047bfbd11fe1f5abda8da0e2391c1918162a
(reverted in c29003813ab9bd6ea7b6de40ea8f1fe21979f13f) to incorporate
subsequent fix and add a warning when LLD's interworking behavior has
changed.
D73474 disabled the generation of interworking thunks for branch
relocations to non STT_FUNC symbols. This patch handles the case of BL and
BLX instructions to non STT_FUNC symbols. LLD would normally look at the
state of the caller and the callee and write a BL if the states are the
same and a BLX if the states are different.
This patch disables BL/BLX substitution when the destination symbol does
not have type STT_FUNC. This brings our behavior in line with GNU ld which
may prevent difficult to diagnose runtime errors when switching to lld.
This change does change how LLD handles interworking of symbols that do not
have type STT_FUNC from previous versions including the 10.0 release. This
brings LLD in line with ld.bfd but there may be programs that have not been
linked with ld.bfd that depend on LLD's previous behavior. We emit a warning
when the behavior changes.
A summary of the difference between 10.0 and 11.0 is that for symbols
that do not have a type of STT_FUNC LLD will not change a BL to a BLX or
vice versa. The table below enumerates the changes
| relocation | STT_FUNC | bit(0) | in | 10.0- out | 11.0+ out |
| R_ARM_CALL | no | 1 | BL | BLX | BL |
| R_ARM_CALL | no | 0 | BLX | BL | BLX |
| R_ARM_THM_CALL | no | 1 | BLX | BL | BLX |
| R_ARM_THM_CALL | no | 0 | BL | BLX | BL |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73542
There are still problems after the fix in
"[ELF][ARM] Fix regression of BL->BLX substitution after D73542"
so let's revert to get trunk back to green while we investigate.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D73542
This reverts commit 5461fa2b1fcfcfcd8e28e3ac3383d2245d5d90bf.
This reverts commit 0b4a047bfbd11fe1f5abda8da0e2391c1918162a.
D73542 made a typo (`rel.type == R_PLT_PC`; should be `rel.expr`) and introduced a regression:
BL->BLX substitution was disabled when the target symbol is preemptible
(expr is R_PLT_PC).
The two added bl instructions in arm-thumb-interwork-shared.s check that
we patch BL to BLX.
Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1047531
D73474 disabled the generation of interworking thunks for branch
relocations to non STT_FUNC symbols. This patch handles the case of BL and
BLX instructions to non STT_FUNC symbols. LLD would normally look at the
state of the caller and the callee and write a BL if the states are the
same and a BLX if the states are different.
This patch disables BL/BLX substitution when the destination symbol does
not have type STT_FUNC. This brings our behavior in line with GNU ld which
may prevent difficult to diagnose runtime errors when switching to lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73542
ELF for the ARM architecture requires linkers to provide
interworking for symbols that are of type STT_FUNC. Interworking for
other symbols must be encoded directly in the object file. LLD was always
providing interworking, regardless of the symbol type, this breaks some
programs that have branches from Thumb state targeting STT_NOTYPE symbols
that have bit 0 clear, but they are in fact internal labels in a Thumb
function. LLD treats these symbols as ARM and inserts a transition to Arm.
This fixes the problem for in range branches, R_ARM_JUMP24,
R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 and R_ARM_THM_JUMP19. This is expected to be the vast
majority of problem cases as branching to an internal label close to the
function.
There is at least one follow up patch required.
- R_ARM_CALL and R_ARM_THM_CALL may do interworking via BL/BLX
substitution.
In theory range-extension thunks can be altered to not change state when
the symbol type is not STT_FUNC. I will need to check with ld.bfd to see if
this is the case in practice.
Fixes (part of) https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73474
Symbol information can be used to improve out-of-range/misalignment diagnostics.
It also helps R_ARM_CALL/R_ARM_THM_CALL which has different behaviors with different symbol types.
There are many (67) relocateOne() call sites used in thunks, {Arm,AArch64}errata, PLT, etc.
Rename them to `relocateNoSym()` to be clearer that there is no symbol information.
Reviewed By: grimar, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73254
R_HINT is ignored like R_NONE. There are no strong reasons to keep
R_HINT. The largest RelExpr member R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT is 60 now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71822
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
This change only affects EM_386. relOff can be computed from `index`
easily, so it is unnecessarily passed as a parameter.
Both in.plt and in.iplt entries are written by writePLT. For in.iplt,
the instruction `push reloc_offset` will change because `index` is now
different. Fortunately, this does not matter because `push; jmp` is only
used by PLT. IPLT does not need the code sequence.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71518
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
ARM and RISC-V do not support TLS relaxations. However, for General
Dynamic and Local Dynamic models, if we are producing an executable and
the symbol is non-preemptable, we know it must be defined and the
R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32/R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD{32,64} dynamic relocation can be
omitted because it is always 1. This may be necessary for static linking
as DTPMOD may not be expected at load time.
Merge handleARMTlsRelocation() into handleTlsRelocation(). This requires
more logic to R_TLSGD_PC and R_TLSLD_PC. Because we use SymbolicRel to
resolve the relocation at link time, R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 can be deleted
from relocateOne(). It cannot be used as a static relocation type.
As a bonus, the additional logic in R_TLSGD_PC code can be shared by the
TLS support for RISC-V (D63220).
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63333
llvm-svn: 363927
