I changed the test so I could tell whether the problem was sometimes the
interrupt was failing, or maybe the was just racy. It failed again, but
in the new failures we waited 20 seconds for the attach-wait to get interrupted
and that never happened.
So there seems to be some real raciness in the feature of interrupting an
attach-wait, but only on Linux & Windows. The bug fix that this test was
testing was for a bug that would cause us to never try to interrupt in this
case. So it looks like this test is uncovering some flakiness in the underlying
interrupt support when in this state. That's a separate bug that needs fixing.
For now, I disabled the test except on macOS where it seems to run reliably.
command.
We were reading the command output right after sending the interrupt, but
sometimes that wasn't long enough for the command result text to have been emitted.
I added a poll for the state change to eStateExited, and then added a bit more sleep
to give the command a chance to complete.
The problem is that the when the "attach" command is initiated, the
ExecutionContext for the command has a process - it's the exited one
from the previour run. But the `attach wait` creates a new process for
the attach, and then errors out instead of interrupting when it finds
that its process and the one in the command's ExecutionContext don't
match.
This change checks that if we're returning a target from
GetExecutionContext, we fill the context with it's current process, not
some historical one.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected stop reason. This is similar to the assertState helper that
was added in ce825e46743b.
Before:
self.assertEqual(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: 5 != 10
After:
self.assertStopReason(stop_reason, lldb.eStopReasonInstrumentation)
AssertionError: signal (5) != instrumentation (10)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131083
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.
Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.
We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.
The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
so that they can be used to prime new Process runs. "process handle"
was also changed to populate the dummy target if there's no selected
target, so that the settings will get copied into new targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259
These tests fail every 10 or so runs on Windows causing both local failures as well as buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111659
The issue here was that we were not updating the interpreter's
execution context when calling HandleCommand to continue the process.
Since we had just created the process, it wasn't in the interpreter's
execution context so HandleCommand failed at CheckRequirements. The
patch fixes that by passing the process execution context directly
to HandleCommand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110787
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
This test is flakey on Windows and on failure it hangs causing the test suite to fail and future builds (on the buildbot, especially) to fail because they cannot re-write the files that are currently in use
Fix the POSIX-DYLD plugin to update the cached executable path after
attaching. Previously, the path was cached in DYLDRendezvous
constructor and not updated afterwards. This meant that if LLDB was
attaching to a process (e.g. via connecting to lldb-server), the code
stored the empty path before DidAttach() resolved it. The fix updates
the cached path in DidAttach().
This fixes a new instance of https://llvm.org/pr17880
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92264
Force gdb-remote plugin when attaching using the derivatives
of PlatformPOSIX class. This is consistent with the behavior
for launching processes (via DebugProcess() method) and guarantees
consistent plugin choice on FreeBSD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92667
This adds `expect_var_path` to test variable paths so we no longer have to
use `frame var` and find substrs in the command output. The behaviour
is identical with `expect_expr` (and it also uses the same checking backend),
but it instead calls `GetValueForVariablePath` to evaluate the string as a variable
path.
Also rewrites a few of the tests that previously used `frame variable` to use
`expect_var_path`.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90450
Those two decorators have identical behaviour. This removes
`not_remote_testsuite_ready` as `skipIfRemote` seems more consistent with the
other decorator names we have
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89376
Copy the recent improvements from the FreeBSDRemote plugin, notably:
- moving event reporting setup into SetupTrace() helper
- adding more debug info into SIGTRAP handling
- handling user-generated (and unknown) SIGTRAP events
- adding missing error handling to the generic signal handler
- fixing attaching to processes
- switching watchpoint helpers to use llvm::Error
- minor style and formatting changes
This fixes a number of tests, mostly related to fixed attaching.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91167
Always clean up subprocesses on tear down instead of relying on the
caller to do so. This is not only less error prone but also means the
tests can be more concise.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83787
Summary:
This replaces the current use of LLDB's own `StringConvert` with LLVM's
`to_integer` which has a less error-prone API and doesn't use special 'error
values' to designate parsing problems.
Where needed I also added missing error handling code that prints a parsing
error instead of continuing with the error value returned from `StringConvert`
(which either gave a cryptic error message or just took the error value
performed an incorrect action with it. For example, `frame recognizer delete -1`
just deleted the frame recognizer at index 0).
Reviewers: #lldb, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82297
Skip tests or parts thereof that aren't expected to work when run from a
reproducer. Also improve the doc comments in configuration.py to prevent
mistakes in the future.
This skips some tests that pass with active replay (which doesn't check
the output) but fail with passive replay. Valid reasons for this
include:
- Checking the output of the process (which doesn't run during replay),
- Checking files that cannot be captured in the VFS (non-existing or
unreadable files or files that are removed during test),
Unfortunately there's no good way to mark a test as supported for active
replay but unsupported for passive replay because the number and order
of API calls needs to be identical during capture and replay. I don't
think this is a huge loss however.
Add the skipIfReproducer decorator to the remaining tests that fail to
replay because the GDB remote packets diverge during replay. This is
*not* expected and should be fixed, but figuring out exactly what caused
the divergence has proven pretty difficult to track down.
I've marked these tests as skipped for now so we can get clean results
and detect new regressions. I have no evidence to believe that these
failures have the same root cause, so I've not assigned them a PR.
Summary:
The error message from the construct `assertTrue(a == b, "msg") ` are nearly always completely useless for actually debugging the issue.
This patch is just replacing this construct (and similar ones like `assertTrue(a != b, ...)` with the proper call to assertEqual or assertNotEquals.
This patch was mostly written by a shell script with some manual verification afterwards:
```
lang=python
import sys
def sanitize_line(line):
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " == " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertEquals(")
line = line.replace(" == ", ", ", 1)
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " != " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertNotEqual(")
line = line.replace(" != ", ", ", 1)
return line
for a in sys.argv[1:]:
with open(a, "r") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
with open(a, "w") as f:
for line in lines:
f.write(sanitize_line(line))
```
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74475
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.
This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:
```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
