This removes the backend requirement for crc instructions on HasV8, relying on
just HasCRC instead. This should allow them to be selected with ArmV7 + crc,
making them more usable whilst hopefully not making them incorrectly generated
(they only come from intrinsics, and HasCRC usually requires HasV8). This is
how most other instructions are specified.
Irritatingly, atomic_store had operands in the opposite order from
regular store. This made it difficult to share patterns between
regular and atomic stores.
There was a previous incomplete attempt to move atomic_store into the
regular StoreSDNode which would be better.
I think it was a mistake for all atomicrmw to swap the operand order,
so maybe it's better to take this one step further.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123143
This patch adds the LLVM-side plumbing for the following relocations:
- R_ARM_THM_ALU_ABS_G0_NC
- R_ARM_THM_ALU_ABS_G1_NC
- R_ARM_THM_ALU_ABS_G2_NC
- R_ARM_THM_ALU_ABS_G3
(see section 5.6.1.5, Static Thumb16 relocations, of the AArch32 ELF Arm ABI:
844a79fd4c/aaelf32/aaelf32.rst (5615static-thumb16-relocations))
Which can respectivly be generated by prefixing assembly symbols with:
- :lower0_7:
- :lower8_15:
- :upper0_7:
- :upper8_15:
LLD support for these relocations will be added in a follow-up patch
Reviewed By: john.brawn, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149443
AArch64 has five system registers intended to be useful as thread
pointers: one for each exception level which is RW at that level and
inaccessible to lower ones, and the special TPIDRRO_EL0 which is
readable but not writable at EL0. AArch32 has three, corresponding to
the AArch64 ones that aren't specific to EL2 or EL3.
Currently clang supports only a subset of these registers, and not
even a consistent subset between AArch64 and AArch32:
- For AArch64, clang permits you to choose between the four TPIDR_ELn
thread registers, but not the fifth one, TPIDRRO_EL0.
- In AArch32, on the other hand, the //only// thread register you can
choose (apart from 'none, use a function call') is TPIDRURO, which
corresponds to (the bottom 32 bits of) AArch64's TPIDRRO_EL0.
So there is no thread register that you can currently use in both
targets!
For custom and bare-metal purposes, users might very reasonably want
to use any of these thread registers. There's no reason they shouldn't
all be supported as options, even if the default choices follow
existing practice on typical operating systems.
This commit extends the range of values acceptable to the `-mtp=`
clang option, so that you can specify any of these registers by (the
lower-case version of) their official names in the ArmARM:
- For AArch64: tpidr_el0, tpidrro_el0, tpidr_el1, tpidr_el2, tpidr_el3
- For AArch32: tpidrurw, tpidruro, tpidrprw
All existing values of the option are still supported and behave the
same as before. Defaults are also unchanged. No command line that
worked already should change behaviour as a result of this.
The new values for the `-mtp=` option have been agreed with Arm's gcc
developers (although I don't know whether they plan to implement them
in the near future).
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152433
This adds an extra tablegen combine for folding fadd(a, vcmul(b, c)) into
vcmla(a, b, c), so long as the fadd is allowed to contract.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147201
This change switches both targets from using target specific CompilerBarrier nodes to the recently introduced generic MEMBARRIER instruction.
A couple things to call out.
First, this changes the assembly comment printed. I'm not sure this matters, but if it does, we can simply drop this patch. This is a minor clean up at best.
Second, the ordering operand on the target instruction appears to be unused. We could easily add ordering to the generic instruction, but since we don't seem to have a motivating case in tree, I simply dropped the ordering when selecting to the generic instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141513
This is the ARM equivalent of D141119, where we fold `and x, (csel 0, 1, cc)`
to `csel ZR, x, cc` if we know that x is 0/1 and for `or x, (csel 0, 1, cc)`
emit `csinc x, ZR, cc`. The or pattern gets recognized from a cmov under Arm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141137
Skip inserting regular CFI instructions if using WinCFI.
This is based a fair amount on the corresponding ARM64 implementation,
but instead of trying to insert the SEH opcodes one by one where
we generate other prolog/epilog instructions, we try to walk over the
whole prolog/epilog range and insert them. This is done because in
many cases, the exact number of instructions inserted is abstracted
away deeper.
For some cases, we manually insert specific SEH opcodes directly where
instructions are generated, where the automatic mapping of instructions
to SEH opcodes doesn't hold up (e.g. for __chkstk stack probes).
Skip Thumb2SizeReduction for SEH prologs/epilogs, and force
tail calls to wide instructions (just like on MachO), to make sure
that the unwind info actually matches the width of the final
instructions, without heuristics about what later passes will do.
Mark SEH instructions as scheduling boundaries, to make sure that they
aren't reordered away from the instruction they describe by
PostRAScheduler.
Mark the SEH instructions with the NoMerge flag, to avoid doing
tail merging of functions that have multiple epilogs that all end
with the same sequence of "b <other>; .seh_nop_w, .seh_endepilogue".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125648
The mask being NoRegister prevented the existing aliases from matching
since NoRegister isn't in the VMV0 register class.
To workaround this I've added new aliases that look for zero_reg.
I had to motify tablegen to generate matching code for zero_reg.
And as a consequence, I had to change the EmitPriority for an ARM
alias that used zero_reg that started printing.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121496
There is a crash in the ARM backend when attempting to decode a "tsb
csync" instruction using `llvm-objdump --triple=armv8.4a -d`. The crash
was in `ARMMCInstrAnalysis::evaluateBranch` where the number of operands
in the decoded instruction (0) did not match the number of operands in
the instruction description (1).
This is becuase `tsb csync` looks like it has an operand during
assembly, but there is only one valid operand (csync), so there is no
encoding space in the instruction for the operand, so the decoder never
has a field to decode that represents `csync`.
The fix is to add a custom decode method, which ensures that this
instruction does have the right number of operands after decoding. This
method merely adds the only available operand value, `ARM_TSB::CSYNC`.
Reviewed By: tmatheson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121479
AArch32/Armv8A introduced the performance deprecation of certain patterns
of IT instructions. After some debate internal to ARM, this is now being
reverted; i.e. no IT instruction patterns are performance deprecated
anymore, as the perfomance degredation is not significant enough.
This reverts the following:
"ARMv8-A deprecates some uses of the T32 IT instruction. All uses of
IT that apply to instructions other than a single subsequent 16-bit
instruction from a restricted set are deprecated, as are explicit
references to the PC within that single 16-bit instruction. This permits
the non-deprecated forms of IT and subsequent instructions to be treated
as a single 32-bit conditional instruction."
The deprecation no longer applies, but the behaviour may be controlled
by the -arm-restrict-it and -arm-no-restrict-it command-line options,
with the latter being the default. No warnings about complex IT blocks
will be generated.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118044
Currently, ARMBaseInstrInfo::getInstSizeInBytes() uses hard-coded
instruction size for some pseudo-instructions, while this
information should ideally be found in ARMInstrInfo.td,
ARMInstrThumb(2).td files (which can be accessed via MCInstrDesc). Hence,
the .td files should be updated and no hard-coded instruction sizes
should be used by getInstSizeInBytes() anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118009
If we only demand bits from one half of a rotation pattern, see if we can simplify to a logical shift.
For the ARM/AArch64 rev16/32 patterns, I had to drop a fold to prevent srl(bswap()) -> rotr(bswap) -> srl(bswap) infinite loops. I've replaced this with an isel PatFrag which should do the same task.
Reapplied with fix for AArch64 rev patterns to matching the ARM fix.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/iroxki (rol -> shl by amt iff demanded bits has at least as many trailing zeros as the shift amount)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/4ez_U- (ror -> shl by revamt iff demanded bits has at least as many trailing zeros as the reverse shift amount)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/cD7dR- (ror -> lshr by amt iff demanded bits has at least as many leading zeros as the shift amount)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_XGHtQ (rol -> lshr by revamt iff demanded bits has at least as many leading zeros as the reverse shift amount)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114354
If we only demand bits from one half of a rotation pattern, see if we can simplify to a logical shift.
For the ARM rev16 patterns, I had to drop a fold to prevent srl(bswap()) -> rotr(bswap) -> srl(bswap) infinite loops. I've replaced this with an isel PatFrag which should do the same task.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/iroxki (rol -> shl by amt iff demanded bits has at least as many trailing zeros as the shift amount)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/4ez_U- (ror -> shl by revamt iff demanded bits has at least as many trailing zeros as the reverse shift amount)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/cD7dR- (ror -> lshr by amt iff demanded bits has at least as many leading zeros as the shift amount)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_XGHtQ (rol -> lshr by revamt iff demanded bits has at least as many leading zeros as the reverse shift amount)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114354
This implements `MCInstrAnalysis::evaluateMemoryOperandAddress()` for
Arm so that the disassembler can print the target address of memory
operands that use PC+immediate addressing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105979
Since this method can apply to cmpxchg operations, make sure it's clear
what value we're actually retrieving. This will help ensure we don't
accidentally ignore the failure ordering of cmpxchg in the future.
We could potentially introduce a getOrdering() method on AtomicSDNode
that asserts the operation isn't cmpxchg, but not sure that's
worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103338
atomicrmw instructions are expanded by AtomicExpandPass before register allocation
into cmpxchg loops. Register allocation can insert spills between the exclusive loads
and stores, which invalidates the exclusive monitor and can lead to infinite loops.
To avoid this, reimplement atomicrmw operations as pseudo-instructions and expand them
after register allocation.
Floating point legalisation:
f16 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*f16, f16) is legalised to
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*i16, f32) and then eventually
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD_16(*i16, f32)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101164
Originally submitted as 3338290c187b254ad071f4b9cbf2ddb2623cefc0.
Reverted in c7df6b1223d88dfd15248fbf7b7b83dacad22ae3.
atomicrmw instructions are expanded by AtomicExpandPass before register allocation
into cmpxchg loops. Register allocation can insert spills between the exclusive loads
and stores, which invalidates the exclusive monitor and can lead to infinite loops.
To avoid this, reimplement atomicrmw operations as pseudo-instructions and expand them
after register allocation.
Floating point legalisation:
f16 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*f16, f16) is legalised to
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*i16, f32) and then eventually
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD_16(*i16, f32)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101164
This adds a pattern to recognize VIDUP from BUILD_VECTOR of incrementing
adds. This can come up from either geps or adds, and came up recently in
D100550. We are just looking for a BUILD_VECTOR where each lane is an
add of the first lane with N*i, where i is the lane and N is one of 1,
2, 4, or 8, supported by the VIDUP instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101263
llvm-objdump only uses one MCInstrAnalysis object, so if ARM and Thumb
code is mixed in one object, or if an object is disassembled without
explicitly setting the triple to match the ISA used, then branch and
call targets will be printed incorrectly.
This could be fixed by creating two MCInstrAnalysis objects in
llvm-objdump, like we currently do for SubtargetInfo. However, I don't
think there's any reason we need two separate sub-classes of
MCInstrAnalysis, so instead these can be merged into one, and the ISA
determined by checking the opcode of the instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97766
As a linker is allowed to clobber r12 on function calls, the code
transformation that hardens indirect calls is not correct in case a
linker does so. Similarly, the transformation is not correct when
register lr is used.
This patch makes sure that r12 or lr are not used for indirect calls
when harden-sls-blr is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92469
Some processors may speculatively execute the instructions immediately
following indirect control flow, such as returns, indirect jumps and
indirect function calls.
To avoid a potential miss-speculatively executed gadget after these
instructions leaking secrets through side channels, this pass places a
speculation barrier immediately after every indirect control flow where
control flow doesn't return to the next instruction, such as returns and
indirect jumps, but not indirect function calls.
Hardening of indirect function calls will be done in a later,
independent patch.
This patch is implementing the same functionality as the AArch64 counter
part implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D81400.
For AArch64, returns and indirect jumps only occur on RET and BR
instructions and hence the function attribute to control the hardening
is called "harden-sls-retbr" there. On AArch32, there is a much wider
variety of instructions that can trigger an indirect unconditional
control flow change. I've decided to stick with the name
"harden-sls-retbr" as introduced for the corresponding AArch64
mitigation.
This patch implements this for ARM mode. A future patch will extend this
to also support Thumb mode.
The inserted barriers are never on the correct, architectural execution
path, and therefore performance overhead of this is expected to be low.
To ensure these barriers are never on an architecturally executed path,
when the harden-sls-retbr function attribute is present, indirect
control flow is never conditionalized/predicated.
On targets that implement that Armv8.0-SB Speculation Barrier extension,
a single SB instruction is emitted that acts as a speculation barrier.
On other targets, a DSB SYS followed by a ISB is emitted to act as a
speculation barrier.
These speculation barriers are implemented as pseudo instructions to
avoid later passes to analyze them and potentially remove them.
The mitigation is off by default and can be enabled by the
harden-sls-retbr subtarget feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92395
Added patterns to generate an SSAT or USAT with shift for
SSAT/USAT instructions that are matched from IR patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88145
Added patterns so that both SSAT and USAT instructions are generated with shifts. Added corresponding regression tests.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85120
Optimize some specific immediates selection by materializing them with sub/mvn
instructions as opposed to loading them from the constant pool.
Patch by Ben Shi, powerman1st@163.com.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83745
This is very similar to 243970d03cace2, but handling a slightly
different form of predicated operations. When starting with a pattern of
the form select(p, BinOp(x, y), x), Instcombine will often transform
this to BinOp(x, select(p, y, 0)), where 0 is the identity value of the
binop (0 for adds/subs, 1 for muls, -1 for ands etc). This adds the
patterns that transforms those back into predicated binary operations.
There is also a very minor adjustment to tablegen null_frag in here, to
allow it to also be recognized as a PatLeaf node, so that it can be used
in MVE_TwoOpPattern to easily exclude the cases where we do not need the
alternate transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84091
We current extract and convert from a top lane of a f16 vector using a
VMOVX;VCVTB pair. We can simplify that to use a single VCVTT. The
pattern is mostly copied from a vector extract pattern, but produces a
VCVTTHS f32 directly.
This had to move some code around so that ARMInstrVFP had access to the
required pattern frags that were previously part of ARMInstrNEON.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81556
The ARM ARM considers p10/p11 valid arguments for MCR/MRC instructions.
MRC instructions with p10 arguments are also used in kernel code which
is shared for different architectures. Turn usage of p10/p11 to warnings
for ARMv7/ARMv8-M.
Reviewers: rengolin, olista01, t.p.northover, efriedma, psmith, simon_tatham
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: hiraditya, danielkiss, jcai19, tpimh, nickdesaulniers, peter.smith, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59733
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
The code generation explicitly deviates from using the register-offset
variant of LDRD/STRD. In this variant, the register allocated to the
register-offset cannot be reused in any of the remaining operands. Such
restriction seems to be non-trivial to implement in LLVM, thus it is
left as a to-do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
This reverts commit 8a12553223180246eeafaa0fa7bfa11e834d34b6.
A bug has been found when generating code for Thumb2. In some very
specific cases, the prologue/epilogue emitter generates erroneous stack
offsets for the new LDRD instructions that access the stack.
This bug does not seem to be caused by the reverted patch though. Likely
the latter has made an undiscovered issue emerge in the
prologue/epilogue emission pass. Nevertheless, this reversion is
necessary since it is blocking users of the ARM backend.
This patch implements the final bits of CMSE code generation:
* emit special linker symbols
* restrict parameter passing to no use memory
* emit BXNS and BLXNS instructions for returns from non-secure entry
functions, and non-secure function calls, respectively
* emit code to save/restore secure floating-point state around calls
to non-secure functions
* emit code to save/restore non-secure floating-pointy state upon
entry to non-secure entry function, and return to non-secure state
* emit code to clobber registers not used for arguments and returns
* when switching to no-secure state
Patch by Momchil Velikov, Bradley Smith, Javed Absar, David Green,
possibly others.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76518
Unlike Neon, MVE does not have a way of duplicating from a vector lane,
so a VDUPLANE currently selects to a VDUP(move_from_lane(..)). This
forces that to be done earlier as a dag combine to allow other folds to
happen.
It converts to a VDUP(EXTRACT). On FP16 this is then folded to a
VGETLANEu to prevent it from creating a vmovx;vmovhr pair, using a
single move_from_reg instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79606
This patch implements the final bits of CMSE code generation:
* emit special linker symbols
* restrict parameter passing to not use memory
* emit BXNS and BLXNS instructions for returns from non-secure entry
functions, and non-secure function calls, respectively
* emit code to save/restore secure floating-point state around calls
to non-secure functions
* emit code to save/restore non-secure floating-pointy state upon
entry to non-secure entry function, and return to non-secure state
* emit code to clobber registers not used for arguments and returns
when switching to no-secure state
Patch by Momchil Velikov, Bradley Smith, Javed Absar, David Green,
possibly others.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76518
This adds MVE vmull patterns, which are conceptually the same as
mul(vmovl, vmovl), and so the tablegen patterns follow the same
structure.
For i8 and i16 this is simple enough, but in the i32 version the
multiply (in 64bits) is illegal, meaning we need to catch the pattern
earlier in a dag fold. Because bitcasts are involved in the zext
versions and the patterns are a little different in little and big
endian. I have only added little endian support in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76740
Add pseudo instructions for ldrsbt/ldrht/ldrsht with implicit immediate
and add fall back C++ code to transform the instruction to the
equivalent LDRSBTi/LDRHTi/LDRSHTi form.
This is similar to how it has been done in commit
fb3950ec6312dfa4317d8cbf83a1db4aae7428ce
This fixes:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
The code generation explicitly deviates from using the register-offset
variant of LDRD/STRD. In this variant, the register allocated to the
register-offset cannot be reused in any of the remaining operands. Such
restriction seems to be non-trivial to implement in LLVM, thus it is
left as a to-do.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: efriedma, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: danielkiss, alanphipps, hans, nathanchance, nickdesaulniers, vvereschaka, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
