This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
This follows the RISC-V work done in
4b40ced4e5ba10b841516b3970e7699ba8ded572.
This uses AArch64's target parser instead. We just list the names,
without the "+" on them, which matches RISC-V's format.
```
$ ./bin/clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu --print-supported-extensions
clang version 18.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 154da8aec20719c82235a6957aa6e461f5a5e030)
Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: <...>
All available -march extensions for AArch64
aes
b16b16
bf16
brbe
crc
crypto
cssc
<...>
```
Since our extensions don't have versions in the same way there's just
one column with the name in.
Any extension without a feature name (including the special "none") is
not listed as those cannot be passed to -march, they're just for the
backend. For example the MTE extension can be added with "+memtag" but
MTE2 and MTE3 do not have feature names so they cannot be added to
-march.
This does not attempt to tackle the fact that clang allows invalid
combinations of AArch64 extensions, it simply lists the possible
options. It's still up to the user to ask for something sensible.
Equally, this has no context of what CPU is being selected. Neither does
the RISC-V option, the user has to be aware of that.
I've added a target parser test, and a high level clang test that checks
RISC-V and AArch64 work and that Intel, that doesn't support this, shows
the correct error.
This updates the AArch64's Target Parser and its uses to capture
information about default features directly from ArchInfo and CpuInfo
objects, instead of relying on an API function to access them
indirectly.
Reviewed By: tmatheson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142540
This updates the parsing methods in AArch64's Target Parser to make use
of optional returns instead of "invalid" enum values, making the API's
behaviour clearer.
Reviewed By: lenary, tmatheson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142539
Reworked after several other major changes to the TargetParser since
this was reverted. Combined with several other changes.
Inline calls for the following macros and delete AArch64TargetParser.def:
AARCH64_ARCH, AARCH64_CPU_NAME, AARCH64_CPU_ALIAS, AARCH64_ARCH_EXT_NAME
Squashed changes from D139278 and D139102.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138792
This reverts commit e43924a75145d2f9e722f74b673145c3e62bfd07.
Reason: Patch broke the MSan buildbots. More information is available on
the original phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127812
This is a fairly large changeset, but it can be broken into a few
pieces:
- `llvm/Support/*TargetParser*` are all moved from the LLVM Support
component into a new LLVM Component called "TargetParser". This
potentially enables using tablegen to maintain this information, as
is shown in https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517. This cannot currently
be done, as llvm-tblgen relies on LLVM's Support component.
- This also moves two files from Support which use and depend on
information in the TargetParser:
- `llvm/Support/Host.{h,cpp}` which contains functions for inspecting
the current Host machine for info about it, primarily to support
getting the host triple, but also for `-mcpu=native` support in e.g.
Clang. This is fairly tightly intertwined with the information in
`X86TargetParser.h`, so keeping them in the same component makes
sense.
- `llvm/ADT/Triple.h` and `llvm/Support/Triple.cpp`, which contains
the target triple parser and representation. This is very intertwined
with the Arm target parser, because the arm architecture version
appears in canonical triples on arm platforms.
- I moved the relevant unittests to their own directory.
And so, we end up with a single component that has all the information
about the following, which to me seems like a unified component:
- Triples that LLVM Knows about
- Architecture names and CPUs that LLVM knows about
- CPU detection logic for LLVM
Given this, I have also moved `RISCVISAInfo.h` into this component, as
it seems to me to be part of that same set of functionality.
If you get link errors in your components after this patch, you likely
need to add TargetParser into LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS in CMake.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137838
