6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov
bdf2fbba9c [AMDGPU] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC) 2022-12-19 12:41:13 +01:00
Roman Lebedev
d4c4bd6b20
[NFC] Port codegen AMDGPU tests that invoke opt to -passes= syntax 2022-12-09 01:04:46 +03:00
Roman Lebedev
b1a9584818
[opt] Disincentivize new tests from using old pass syntax
Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests,
and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax
from ~1800 to just 200.

Left to handle: (as it is seen in this patch)
* Transforms/LSR
* Transforms/CGP
* Transforms/TypePromotion
* Transforms/HardwareLoops
* Analysis/*
* some misc.

I think this is the right point to start actively refusing
to honor the old syntax, except for the old tests,
to prevent the old syntax from creeping back in.

Thus, let's add temporary default-off flag,
and if it is not passed refuse to accept old syntax.
The tests that still need porting are annotated with this flag.

Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139647
2022-12-08 23:54:03 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks
a11bf9a7fb [AMDGPU][Inliner] Remove amdgpu-inline and add a new TTI inline hook
Having a custom inliner doesn't really fit in with the new PM's
pipeline. It's also extra technical debt.

amdgpu-inline only does a couple of custom things compared to the normal
inliner:
1) It disables inlining if the number of BBs in a function would exceed
   some limit
2) It increases the threshold if there are pointers to private arrays(?)

These can all be handled as TTI inliner hooks.
There already exists a hook for backends to multiply the inlining
threshold.

This way we can remove the custom amdgpu-inline pass.

This caused inline-hint.ll to fail, and after some investigation, it
looks like getInliningThresholdMultiplier() was previously getting
applied twice in amdgpu-inline (https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707 fixed it
not applying at all, so some later inliner change must have fixed
something), so I had to change the threshold in the test.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94153
2021-01-21 20:29:17 -08:00
Valery Pykhtin
ffeb01c113 [AMDGPU] Don't constrain callees with inlinehint from inlining on MaxBB check
Summary: Function bodies marked inline in an opencl source are eliminated but MaxBB check may prevent inlining them leaving undefined references.

Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, Anastasia, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63337

llvm-svn: 363418
2019-06-14 16:37:33 +00:00
Valery Pykhtin
cb8de55f47 [AMDGPU] Constrain the AMDGPU inliner on maximum number of basic blocks in a caller function (compile time performance)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62917

llvm-svn: 362789
2019-06-07 12:16:46 +00:00