There can be situations where global and flat loads and stores are not
combined by the vectorizer, in particular if their address space
differ in the IR but they end up the same class instructions after
selection. For example a divergent load from constant address space
ends up being the same global_load as a load from global address space.
TODO: merge global stores.
TODO: handle SADDR forms.
TODO: merge flat load/stores.
TODO: merge flat with global promoting to flat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120279
Use a subtarget feature instead of a command line argument to reduce
global state.
We want to enable flat scratch for graphics in some cases and this
doesn't work well with command line options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119425
- Add an internal option `-amdgpu-use-aa-in-codegen` to enable or
disable this feature. By Default, it's enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89320
The support is disabled by default. So far there is instruction
selection, spilling, and frame elimination. It also changes SP
from unswizzled to swizzled as used by flat scratch instructions,
so it cannot be mixed with MUBUF stack access.
At the very least missing:
- GlobalISel;
- Some optimizations in frame elimination in between vector
and scalar ALU;
- It shall finally allow to always materialize frame index
as an SGPR, but that is not implemented and frame elimination
cannot handle it yet;
- Unaligned and/or multidword flat scratch shall work, but it
is legalized now for MUBUF;
- Operand folding cannot optimize FI like with MUBUF yet;
- It will need scaling the value of the SP/FP in the DWARF
expression to recover the unswizzled scratch address;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89170
This reverts commit ca907bfb57d8ad3ec3bcc2cff2abab7b1b933af6.
According to michel.daenzer,
> This completely broke the Mesa radeonsi driver on Navi 14. Xorg +
> xterm come up with major corruption & psychedelic colours.
When memory operations are outstanding on function calls, either the
caller or the callee can insert a waitcnt to ensure that all reads are
finished.
Calls need some time to be executed, so if the callee inserts the
waitcnt, filling the instruction buffer and waiting for memory will be
interleaved, hiding some latency. This comes at the cost of having a
waitcnt inside functions that may not be needed as no memory operations
are outstanding.
For function calls, this is already implemented. The same principal
applies to returns: If the caller inserts a waitcnt after the call, the
callee does not have to wait and the return and memory operation can be
run in parallel.
This commit implements waiting in the caller after returning from a
function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87674
