PR #66334 tried to renumber slot indexes before register allocation, but
the numbering was still affected by list entries for instructions which
had been erased. Fix this to make the register allocator's live range
length heuristics even less dependent on the history of how instructions
have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
PowerPC subtargets prior to Power9 use the 'legacy' itinerary way to
provide scheduling information. This patch re-writes the tablegen file
to define the scheduling information in the new SchedModel way, which
can bring improvements to some benchmarks.
Reviewed By: shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154488
Reassociate gep (gep ptr, idx1), idx2 to gep (gep ptr, idx2), idx1
if this would make the inner GEP loop invariant and thus hoistable.
This is intended to replace an InstCombine fold that does this (in
04f61fb73d/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp (L2006)).
The problem with the InstCombine fold is that LoopInfo is an optional
dependency, so it is not performed reliably.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146813
The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov. Due to the size of the change it is split into
several parts.
Reviewed By: nemanja, amyk, nikic, PowerPC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135470
Update CodeGen regression tests with marker at first line telling it's
auto-generated by the script, under PowerPC directory. For some reason,
these tests are generated but manually written, which makes things
unclear when someone's change affecting them.
However, some tests only show simple change after re-generated, like
extra blank lines, disappearing '.localentry', etc. Besides, some tests
are generated but added checks for debug output. This commit doesn't try
updating them.
The CTR loops pass will insert the decrementing branch instruction in an exiting
block for the loop being transformed. However if that block is part of another
loop as well (whether a nested loop or with irreducible CFG), it is not valid
to use that exiting block. In fact, if the loop hass irreducible CFG, we don't
bother analyzing it and we just bail on the transformation. In practice, this
doesn't lead to a noticeable reduction in the number of loops transformed by
this pass.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37229
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46162
llvm-svn: 331410
