This change adjusts the cost modeling used when the target does not have a schedule model with individual instruction latencies. After this change, we use the default latency information available from TargetSchedule. The default latency information essentially ends up treating most instructions as latency 1, with a few "expensive" ones getting a higher cost.
Previously, we unconditionally applied the first legal pattern - without any consideration of profitability. As a result, this change both prevents some patterns being applied, and changes which patterns are exercised. (i.e. previously the first pattern was applied, afterwards, maybe the second one is because the first wasn't profitable.)
The motivation here is two fold.
First, this brings the default behavior in line with the behavior when -mcpu or -mtune is specified. This improves test coverage, and generally makes it less likely we will have bad surprises when providing more information to the compiler.
Second, this enables some reassociation for ILP by default. Despite being unconditionally enabled, the prior code tended to "reassociate" repeatedly through an entire chain and simply moving the first operand to the end. The result was still a serial chain, just a different one. With this change, one of the intermediate transforms is unprofitable and we end up with a partially flattened tree.
Note that the resulting code diffs show significant room for improvement in the basic algorithm. I am intentionally excluding those from this patch.
For the test diffs, I don't seen any concerning regressions. I took a fairly close look at the RISCV ones, but only skimmed the x86 (particularly vector x86) changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141017
This patch relaxes the restriction that both reassociate operands must
be in the same block as the root instruction.
The comment indicates that the reason for this restriction was that the
operands not in the same block won't have a depth in the trace.
I believe this is outdated; if the operand is in a different block, it
must dominate the current block (otherwise it would need to be phi),
which in turn means the operand's block must be included in the current
rance, and depths must be available.
There's a test case (no_reassociate_different_block) added in
70520e2f1c5fc4 which shows that we have accurate depths for operands
defined in other blocks.
This allows reassociation of code that computes the final reduction
value after vectorization, among other things.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141302
Inspired by D138107.
We can add ADD, AND, OR, XOR, MUL, MIN[U]/MAX[U] to isAssociativeAndCommutative
to increase instruction-level parallelism by the existing MachineCombiner pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140530
This adds a RISCVISD::ABSW to remember that we started with an i32
abs. Previously we used a DAG combine of (sext_inreg (abs)) to
delay emitting a freeze from type legalization in order to make
ComputeNumSignBits optimizations work on other promoted nodes.
This new approach always uses negw+max even if the result doesn't
need to be sign extended. This helps the RISCVSExtWRemoval pass
if the sext.w is in another basic block.
This extension does not appear to be on its way to ratification.
Out of the unratified bitmanip extensions, this one had the
largest impact on the compiler.
Posting this patch to start a discussion about whether we should
remove these extensions. We'll talk more at the RISC-V sync meeting this
Thursday.
Reviewed By: asb, reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133834
If the types aren't legal, the expansions may get type legalized in a
different way preventing code sharing. If the type is legal, we will
share some instructions between the two expansions, but we will need an
extra register.
Since we don't appear to fold (neg (sub A, B)) if the sub has an
additional user, I think it makes sense not to expand NABS.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120513
Default type legalization will create sext_inreg+abs, but we may
not be able to remove the sext_inreg.
Instead this patch expands abs during type legalization to
Y = sraiw X, 31; subw(xor X, Y), Y) which doesn't require the input
to be sign extended.
This gives a big improvement for some neg-abs tests where the
abs is used more than the the neg. Previously the abs was expanded
a different way before and after type legalization. Now they are
expanded in a similar way enabling more CSE.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120636
Add Zbt (ternary) extension code generation to the select lowering
tests since it can have a significant impact on how select is
lowered.
While we are here make the neg-abs commands more consistent with
the other tests.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94798
We currently don't match this which limits the effectiveness of D91120 until
InstCombine starts canonicalizing to llvm.abs. This should be easy to remove
if/when we remove the SPF_ABS handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92118
