PR #66334 tried to renumber slot indexes before register allocation, but
the numbering was still affected by list entries for instructions which
had been erased. Fix this to make the register allocator's live range
length heuristics even less dependent on the history of how instructions
have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
RegAllocGreedy uses SlotIndexes::getApproxInstrDistance to approximate
the length of a live range for its heuristics. Renumbering all slot
indexes with the default instruction distance ensures that this estimate
will be as accurate as possible, and will not depend on the history of
how instructions have been added to and removed from SlotIndexes's maps.
This also means that enabling -early-live-intervals, which runs the
SlotIndexes analysis earlier, will not cause large amounts of churn due
to different register allocator decisions.
Noticed in D150143/D150526 - we currently create scalar Constant values using the broadcast instruction width, which might be wider than the original build vector width, making it tricky to recognise the original constant bits data.
If we have widened the broadcast value, its much more useful for asm comments if we create a ConstantVector with the original element data, add that to the constant-pool and load that with the same (wider) broadcast instruction.
Now, when llc encounters the case that contains a lot of
extract_vector_elt and a BUILD_VECTOR, it will replace these to
vector_shuffle to decrease the size of code, the actions are done in
createBuildVecShuffle in DAGCombiner.cpp, but now the code cannot handle
the case that the size of source vector reg is more than twice the dest
size.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139685
This stops reporting CostPerUse 1 for `R8`-`R15` and `XMM8`-`XMM31`.
This was previously done because instruction encoding require a REX
prefix when using them resulting in longer instruction encodings. I
found that this regresses the quality of the register allocation as the
costs impose an ordering on eviction candidates. I also feel that there
is a bit of an impedance mismatch as the actual costs occure when
encoding instructions using those registers, but the order of VReg
assignments is not primarily ordered by number of Defs+Uses.
I did extensive measurements with the llvm-test-suite wiht SPEC2006 +
SPEC2017 included, internal services showed similar patterns. Generally
there are a log of improvements but also a lot of regression. But on
average the allocation quality seems to improve at a small code size
regression.
Results for measuring static and dynamic instruction counts:
Dynamic Counts (scaled by execution frequency) / Optimization Remarks:
Spills+FoldedSpills -5.6%
Reloads+FoldedReloads -4.2%
Copies -0.1%
Static / LLVM Statistics:
regalloc.NumSpills mean -1.6%, geomean -2.8%
regalloc.NumReloads mean -1.7%, geomean -3.1%
size..text mean +0.4%, geomean +0.4%
Static / LLVM Statistics:
mean -2.2%, geomean -3.1%) regalloc.NumSpills
mean -2.6%, geomean -3.9%) regalloc.NumReloads
mean +0.6%, geomean +0.6%) size..text
Static / LLVM Statistics:
regalloc.NumSpills mean -3.0%
regalloc.NumReloads mean -3.3%
size..text mean +0.3%, geomean +0.3%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133902
Test updates were performed using:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34
These are only the test updates where the test passed without
further modification (which is almost all of them, as the backend
is largely pointer-type agnostic).
This moves the matching of AVGFloor and AVGCeil into a place where
demand bit are available, so that it can detect more cases for more
folds. It changes the transform to start from a shift, not from a
truncate. We match the pattern shr(add(ext(A), ext(B)), 1), transforming
to ext(hadd(A, B)).
For signed values, because only the bottom bits are demanded llvm will
transform the above to use a lshr too, as opposed to ashr. In order to
correctly detect the hadd we need to know the demanded bits to turn it
back. Depending on whether the shift is signed (ashr) or logical (lshr),
and the extensions are signed or unsigned we can create different nodes.
If the shift is signed:
Needs >= 2 sign bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/h4gQAW generating signed rhadd.
Needs >= 2 zero bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/B64DUA generating unsigned rhadd.
If the shift is unsigned:
Needs >= 1 zero bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ByD8sj generating unsigned rhadd.
Needs 1 demanded bit zero and >= 2 sign bits https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hvPGxX and
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/32P5n1 generating signed rhadd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119072
Pulled out of D106237, this replaces the X86ISD::AVG DAG node with the
generic ISD::AVGCEILU. It doesn't remove the detectAVGPattern method,
but the extra generic ISel matching does alter the existing test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119073
Limit this to SSE41 - AVX1 targets to avoid UNPCKL(PSHUFB,PSHUFB), pre-SSE41 we don't have PACKUSDW/BLENDW and with AVX2 we can perform this as PERMQ(PSHUFB()).
As noted in https://github.com/halide/Halide/pull/6302,
we hilariously fail to match PAVG if we even as much
as look at it the wrong way.
In this particular case, the problem stems from the fact that
`PAVG` root (def) is a `trunc`, and leafs (uses) are `zext`'s,
and InstCombine really loves to get rid of both of these,
for example replace them with a bit mask. So we may not have
said `zext`.
Instead of checking for that + type match,
i think we should rely on the actual active type,
as per the knownbits.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111571
This patch contains following enhancements to SrcRegMap and DstRegMap:
1 In findOnlyInterestingUse not only check if the Reg is two address usage,
but also check after commutation can it be two address usage.
2 If a physical register is clobbered, remove SrcRegMap entries that are
mapped to it.
3 In processTiedPairs, when create a new COPY instruction, add a SrcRegMap
entry only when the COPY instruction is coalescable. (The COPY src is
killed)
With these enhancements isProfitableToCommute can do better commute decision,
and finally more register copies are removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108731
I believe, the profitability reasoning here is correct
"sub"reg is already located within the 0'th subreg of wider reg,
so if we have suvector insertion at index 0 into undef,
then it's always free do to.
After this, D109065 finally avoids the regression in D108382.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109074
The motivation is that the update script has at least two deviations
(`<...>@GOT`/`<...>@PLT`/ and not hiding pointer arithmetics) from
what pretty much all the checklines were generated with,
and most of the tests are still not updated, so each time one of the
non-up-to-date tests is updated to see the effect of the code change,
there is a lot of noise. Instead of having to deal with that each
time, let's just deal with everything at once.
This has been done via:
```
cd llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86
grep -rl "; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py" | xargs -L1 <...>/llvm-project/llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py --llc-binary <...>/llvm-project/build/bin/llc
```
Not all tests were regenerated, however.
If the shuffle mask can't be widened to match the original extracted element width, see if the upper bits are zeroable - which allows us to extract+zero-extend the smaller extraction.
Specify LHS/RHS operands in matchShuffleWithUNPCK's calls to isTargetShuffleEquivalent, and handle VBROADCAST/VBROADCAST_LOAD matching in IsElementEquivalent
Drop the pow2 vector limitation for AVG generation by padding the vector to the next pow2, creating the PAVG nodes and then extracting the final subvector.
Fixes some poor codegen that has been annoying me for years.....
This patch uses partial DemandedElts masks to further simplify target shuffle chains and finally starts making target shuffle combining part of SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.
We already manage this for Depth == 0 cases, where combineX86ShuffleChain would early-out if the shuffle combined to the same op, but the patch generalizes this by manipulating the depth handling of combineX86ShufflesRecursively - calling with a new Depth = 0 and reducing the maximum shuffle combine depth accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66004
If the mask input to getV4X86ShuffleImm8 only refers to a single source element (+ undefs) then canonicalize to a full broadcast.
getV4X86ShuffleImm8 defaults to inline values for undefs, which can be useful for shuffle widening/narrowing but does leave SimplifyDemanded* calls thinking the shuffle depends on unnecessary elements.
I'm still investigating what we should do more generally to avoid these undemanded elements, but broadcast cases was a simpler win.
If we lower a v2i64 shuffle to PSHUFD, we currently clamp undef elements to 0, (elements 0,1 of the v4i32) which can result in the shuffle referencing more elements of the source vector than expected, affecting later shuffle combines and KnownBits/SimplifyDemanded calls.
By ensuring we widen the undef mask element we allow getV4X86ShuffleImm8 to use inline elements as the default, which are more likely to fold.
Truncations lowered as shuffles of multiple (concatenated) vectors often leave us with lane-crossing shuffles that feed a PACKSS/PACKUS, if both shuffles are fed from the same 2 vector sources, then we can PACK the sources directly and shuffle the result instead.
This is currently limited to whole i128 lanes in a 256-bit vector, but we can extend this if the need arises (but I'm not seeing many examples in real world code).
We generate PACK instructions with an undef second source when we are truncating from a 128-bit vector to something narrower and we don't care about the upper bits of the vector register. The register allocation process will always assign untied undef uses to xmm0. This creates a false dependency on xmm0.
By adding these instructions to hasUndefRegUpdate, we can get the BreakFalseDeps pass to reassign the source to match the other input. Normally this interface is used for instructions that might need an xor inserted to break the dependency. But the pass also has a heuristic that tries to use the same register as other sources. That should always be possible for these instructions so we'll never trigger the xor dependency break.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79032
This moves v32i16/v64i8 to a model consistent with how we
treat integer types with avx1.
This does change the ABI for types vXi16/vXi8 vectors larger than
512 bits to pass in multiple zmms instead of multiple ymms. We'd
already hacked some code to make v64i8/v32i16 pass in zmm.
Cost model is still a bit of a mess. In some place I tried to
match existing behavior. But really we need to account for
splitting and concating costs. Cost model for shuffles is
especially pessimistic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76212
We can improve computeKnownBits results by avoiding excess bitcasts.
For this pattern we were doing:
(v16i8 PACKUS(v8i16 BITCAST(v16i8 AND(V1, MASK)), v8i16 BITCAST(v16i8 AND(V2, MASK))))
By performing the MASK/AND with a v8i16 type and bitcasting V1/V2 directly we can help computeKnownBits see that the mask is clearing the upper bits and allows shuffle combining to peek through later on.
This will be necessary to extend rG9d1721ce3926 to AVX2+ targets in a future patch.
If we're extracting the 0'th index of a v16i8 vector we're better off using MOVD than PEXTRB, unless we're storing the value or we require the implicit zero extension of PEXTRB.
The biggest perf diff is on SLM targets where MOVD (uops=1, lat=3 tp=1) is notably faster than PEXTRB (uops=2, lat=5, tp=4).
This matches what we already do for PEXTRW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76138
This patch reuses the existing MatchRotate ROTL/ROTR rotation pattern code to also recognize the more general FSHL/FSHR funnel shift patterns when we have constant shift amounts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75114
For pre-AVX512 targets, combine binary shuffles to X86ISD::VPERM2X128 if possible. This mainly helps optimize the blend(extract_subvector(x,1),y) pattern.
At some point soon we're going to have make a decision about when to combine AVX512 shuffles more aggressively - we bail out if there is any change in element size (to protect predicate mask merging) which means we miss out on a lot of optimizations.
If we go with D75412, we no longer depend on the scalar type directly. So we don't need to avoid using i64. We already have AVX1 fallback patterns with i32 and i64 scalar types so we don't need to avoid using integer types on AVX1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75413
The unseen logic diff occurs because MayFoldLoad() is defined like this:
static bool MayFoldLoad(SDValue Op) {
return Op.hasOneUse() && ISD::isNormalLoad(Op.getNode());
}
The test diffs here all seem ok to me on screen/paper, but it's hard to know
if that will lead to universally better perf for all targets. For example,
if a target implements broadcast from mem as multiple uops, we would have to
weigh the potential reduction of instructions and register pressure vs.
possible increase in number of uops. I don't know if we can make a truly
informed decision on this at compile-time.
The motivating case that I'm looking at in PR42024:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42024
...resembles the diff in extract-concat.ll, but we're not going to change the
larger example there without at least 1 other fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74088
If we are extracting a chunk of a vector that's a fraction of an
operand of the concatenated vector operand, we can extract directly
from one of those original operands.
This is another suggestion from PR42024:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42024#c2
But I'm not sure yet if it will make any difference on those patterns.
It seems to help a few existing AVX512 tests though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72361
gcc and icc pass these types in zmm registers in zmm registers.
This patch implements a quick hack to override the register
type before calling convention handling to one that is legal.
Longer term we might want to do something similar to 256-bit
integer registers on AVX1 where we just split all the operations.
Fixes PR42957
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66708
llvm-svn: 370495
The motivating case are the changes in vector-reduce-add.ll where
we were doing extra work in the scalar domain instead of shuffling.
There may be some one use check that needs to be looked into there,
but this patch sidesteps the issue by avoiding broadcasts that
aren't really broadcasting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66071
llvm-svn: 369287
The assert that caused this to be reverted should be fixed now.
Original commit message:
This patch changes our defualt legalization behavior for 16, 32, and
64 bit vectors with i8/i16/i32/i64 scalar types from promotion to
widening. For example, v8i8 will now be widened to v16i8 instead of
promoted to v8i16. This keeps the elements widths the same and pads
with undef elements. We believe this is a better legalization strategy.
But it carries some issues due to the fragmented vector ISA. For
example, i8 shifts and multiplies get widened and then later have
to be promoted/split into vXi16 vectors.
This has the potential to cause regressions so we wanted to get
it in early in the 10.0 cycle so we have plenty of time to
address them.
Next steps will be to merge tests that explicitly test the command
line option. And then we can remove the option and its associated
code.
llvm-svn: 368183
This reverts commit 3de33245d2c992c9e0af60372043540b60f3a810.
This commit broke the MSan buildbots. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL367901 for more information.
llvm-svn: 368107
This patch changes our defualt legalization behavior for 16, 32, and
64 bit vectors with i8/i16/i32/i64 scalar types from promotion to
widening. For example, v8i8 will now be widened to v16i8 instead of
promoted to v8i16. This keeps the elements widths the same and pads
with undef elements. We believe this is a better legalization strategy.
But it carries some issues due to the fragmented vector ISA. For
example, i8 shifts and multiplies get widened and then later have
to be promoted/split into vXi16 vectors.
This has the potential to cause regressions so we wanted to get
it in early in the 10.0 cycle so we have plenty of time to
address them.
Next steps will be to merge tests that explicitly test the command
line option. And then we can remove the option and its associated
code.
llvm-svn: 367901
The build_vector will become a constant pool load. By using the
desired type initially, it ensures we don't generate a bitcast
of the constant pool load which will need to be folded with
the load.
While experimenting with another patch, I noticed that when the
load type and the constant pool type don't match, then
SimplifyDemandedBits can't handle it. While we should probably
fix that, this was a simple way to fix the issue I saw.
llvm-svn: 366732
Ideally this needs to be a generic combine in DAGCombiner::visitEXTRACT_SUBVECTOR but there's some nasty regressions in aarch64 due to neon shuffles not handling bitcasts at all.....
llvm-svn: 364407
This shows up as a side issue to the main problem for the AVX target example from PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428 - https://godbolt.org/z/7tpRa3
But as we can see in the pile of existing test diffs, it's actually a widespread problem
that affects any AVX or later target. Apart from a couple of oddballs, I think these are
all improvements for the reasons stated in the code comment: we do not want to enable YMM
unnecessarily (avoid vzeroupper and frequency throttling) and some cores split 256-bit
stores anyway.
We could say that MergeConsecutiveStores() is going overboard on some of these examples,
but that won't solve the problem completely. But that is a reason I'm proposing this as
a lowering rather than a combine: we will infinite loop fighting the merge code if we try
this earlier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62498
llvm-svn: 362524
