371 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeremy Morse
d2d9dc8eb4
[DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Make debugify pass convert to/from RemoveDIs mode (#73251)
Debugify is extremely useful as a testing and debugging tool, and a good
number of LLVM-IR transform tests use it. We need it to support "new"
non-instruction debug-info to get test coverage, but it's not important
enough to completely convert right now (and it'd be a large
undertaking). Thus: convert to/from dbg.value/DPValue mode on entry and
exit of the pass, which gives us the functionality without any further
work. The cost is compile-time, but again this is only happening during
tests.

Tested by: the large set of debugify tests enabled here. Note the
InstCombine test (cast-mul-select.ll) that hasn't been fully enabled:
this is because there's a debug-info sinking piece of code there that
hasn't been instrumented.
2023-11-29 13:19:50 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
c672ba7dde
[DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Instrument inliner for non-instr debug-info (#72884)
With intrinsics representing debug-info, we just clone all the
intrinsics when inlining a function and don't think about it any
further. With non-instruction debug-info however we need to be a bit
more careful and manually move the debug-info from one place to another.
For the most part, this means keeping a "cursor" during block cloning of
where we last copied debug-info from, and performing debug-info copying
whenever we successfully clone another instruction.

There are several utilities in LLVM for doing this, all of which now
need to manually call cloneDebugInfo. The testing story for this is not
well covered as we could rely on normal instruction-cloning mechanisms
to do all the hard stuff. Thus, I've added a few tests to explicitly
test dbg.value behaviours, ahead of them becoming not-instructions.
2023-11-26 21:24:29 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
e09758224b
[DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Instrument jump-threading to update DPValues (#73127)
This patch makes jump-threading handle non-instruction debug-info stored
in DPValues in the same way that it updates dbg.values nowadays. This
involves re-targetting their operands as with dbg.values getting moved
from one block to another, and manually cloning them when duplicating
blocks. The SSAUpdater class also grows some functions for SSA-updating
DPValues in the same way as dbg.values.

All of this is largely covered by existing debug-info tests, except for
the cloning of DPValues attached to elidable instructions and branches,
where I've added a test to thread-debug-info.ll. Where previously we
could rely on dbg.values being copied and cloned as normal instructions
are, as we need to explicitly perform that operation now I've added some
explicit testing for it.
2023-11-23 17:07:10 +00:00
Nikita Popov
e4a4122eb6
[IR] Remove zext and sext constant expressions (#71040)
Remove support for zext and sext constant expressions. All places
creating them have been removed beforehand, so this just removes the
APIs and uses of these constant expressions in tests.

There is some additional cleanup that can be done on top of this, e.g.
we can remove the ZExtInst vs ZExtOperator footgun.

This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
2023-11-03 10:46:07 +01:00
Nikita Popov
75881dbb0f
[JumpThreading] Don't phi translate past loop phi (#70664)
When evaluating comparisons in predecessors, phi operands are translated
into the predecessor. If the translation is across a backedge, this
means that the two operands of the icmp will be from two different loop
iterations, resulting in incorrect simplification.

Fix this by not performing the phi translation for phis in loop headers.

Note: This is not a complete fix. If the
jump-threading-across-loop-headers option is enabled, the LoopHeaders
variable does not get populated. Additional changes will be needed to
fix that case.

Related to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70651.
2023-10-31 10:20:07 +01:00
Nikita Popov
fb08c694a4 [JumpThreading] Add test for #70651 (NFC) 2023-10-30 15:26:25 +01:00
XChy
fc6bdb8549
[SimplifyCFG] Reland transform for redirecting phis between unmergeable BB and SuccBB (#68473)
Reland #67275 with #68953 resolved.
2023-10-28 17:10:20 +08:00
Matthias Braun
e3cf80c5c1
BlockFrequencyInfoImpl: Avoid big numbers, increase precision for small spreads
BlockFrequencyInfo calculates block frequencies as Scaled64 numbers but as a last step converts them to unsigned 64bit integers (`BlockFrequency`). This improves the factors picked for this conversion so that:

* Avoid big numbers close to UINT64_MAX to avoid users overflowing/saturating when adding multiply frequencies together or when multiplying with integers. This leaves the topmost 10 bits unused to allow for some room.
* Spread the difference between hottest/coldest block as much as possible to increase precision.
* If the hot/cold spread cannot be represented loose precision at the lower end, but keep the frequencies at the upper end for hot blocks differentiable.
2023-10-24 20:27:39 -07:00
Muhammad Omair Javaid
431969ede1 Revert "[SimplifyCFG] Transform for redirecting phis between unmergeable BB and SuccBB (#67275)"
This reverts commit fc86d031fec5e47c6811efd3a871742ad244afdd.

This change breaks LLVM buildbot clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/176/builds/5474
I am going to revert this patch as the bot has been failing for more than a day without a fix.
2023-09-26 15:47:16 +05:00
XChy
fc86d031fe
[SimplifyCFG] Transform for redirecting phis between unmergeable BB and SuccBB (#67275)
This patch extends function TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock to
handle the similar cases below.

```llvm
define i8 @src(i8 noundef %arg) {
start:
  switch i8 %arg, label %unreachable [
    i8 0, label %case012
    i8 1, label %case1
    i8 2, label %case2
    i8 3, label %end
  ]

unreachable:
  unreachable

case1:
  br label %case012

case2:
  br label %case012

case012:
  %phi1 = phi i8 [ 3, %case2 ], [ 2, %case1 ], [ 1, %start ]
  br label %end

end:
  %phi2 = phi i8 [ %phi1, %case012 ], [ 4, %start ]
  ret i8 %phi2
}
```
The phis here should be merged into one phi, so that we can better
optimize it:

```llvm
define i8 @tgt(i8 noundef %arg) {
start:
  switch i8 %arg, label %unreachable [
    i8 0, label %end
    i8 1, label %case1
    i8 2, label %case2
    i8 3, label %case3
  ]

unreachable:
  unreachable

case1:
  br label %end

case2:
  br label %end

case3:
  br label %end

end:
  %phi = phi i8 [ 4, %case3 ], [ 3, %case2 ], [ 2, %case1 ], [ 1, %start ]
  ret i8 %phi
}
```
Proof:
[normal](https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vAWi88)
[multiple stages](https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/DDBQqp)
[multiple stages 2](https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/nGkeqN)
[multiple phi combinations](https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/VQeEdp)

And lookup table optimization should convert it into add %arg 1.
This patch just match similar CFG structure and merge the phis in
different cases.

Maybe such transform can be applied to other situations besides switch,
but I'm not sure whether it's better than not merging. Therefore, I only
try it in switch,

Related issue:
#63876

[Migrated](https://reviews.llvm.org/D155940)
2023-09-25 10:13:45 +08:00
Matthias Braun
168c288af1
JumpThreading: Propagate branch weights in tryToUnfoldSelectInCurrBB (#66116)
Propagate "branch_weights" metadata whe turning a select into a
conditional branch in tryToUnfoldSelectInCurrBB
2023-09-12 13:36:49 -07:00
DianQK
7ded71b1e4
[JumpThreading] Invalidate LVI after combineMetadataForCSE. 2023-09-04 11:50:14 +08:00
DianQK
5855a4be9c
[JumpThreading][NFC] Pre-commit for invalid LVI. 2023-09-04 11:50:07 +08:00
Matt Arsenault
6f2e943de6 InstSimplify: Handle folding fcmp with literal nans without a context instruction
Fixes reported assert after ddb3f12c428bc4bd5a98913d74dfd7f2402bdfd8
2023-09-02 10:22:09 -04:00
Nikita Popov
4eafc9b6ff [IR] Treat callbr as special terminator (PR64215)
isLegalToHoistInto() currently return true for callbr instructions.
That means that a callbr with one successor will be considered a
proper loop preheader, which may result in instructions that use
the callbr return value being hoisted past it.

Fix this by adding callbr to isExceptionTerminator (with a rename
to isSpecialTerminator), which also fixes similar assumptions in
other places.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64215.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158609
2023-08-25 09:20:18 +02:00
Noah Goldstein
39e9862e6b [ValueTracking] Use predicates for incoming phi-edges to deduce non-zero
This is basically a copy and paste of the same logic we do in
`computeKnownBits` but adapts it for just `isKnownNonZero`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157801
2023-08-22 10:59:02 -05:00
Noah Goldstein
99d99eb3b0 [JumpThreading] Regenerate checks for test; NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157815
2023-08-22 10:59:02 -05:00
Matt Arsenault
fa90f6b9d0 TTI: Pass function to hasBranchDivergence in a few passes
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152033
2023-07-07 09:49:38 -04:00
Nikita Popov
1379127481 [MemoryBuiltins] Handle phi nodes without operands (PR63013)
Conservatively return unknown in this degenerate case. This is
hard to hit in practice, because such phis are usually optimized
away before they reach a getObjectSize() call.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63013.
2023-05-31 10:47:15 +02:00
Nikita Popov
92dc4fff87 [ValueTracking] Check for known bits conflict for shl nsw (PR62908)
I removed the conflict check from computeKnownBitsFromShiftOperator()
in D150648 assuming that this is now handled on the KnownBits side.
However, the nsw handling is still inside ValueTracking, so we
still need to handle conflicts there. Restore the check closer to
where it is relevant.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62908.
2023-05-24 10:54:10 +02:00
luxufan
f44c7dec67 [Local] Use most generic range if K does not dominate J or K doesn't have a !noundef
Since D141386 has changed the return value of !range from IUB to poison,
metadata !range shouldn't be preserved even if K dominates J.

If this patch was accepted, I plan to adjust metadata !nonnull as well.
BTW, I found that metadata !noundef is not handled in combineMetadata,
is this intentional?

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142687
2023-03-23 19:31:55 +08:00
Evgeniy Brevnov
a1b78fb929 [JT][CT] Preserve exisiting BPI/BFI during JumpThreading
Currently, JT creates and updates local instances of BPI\BFI. As a result global ones have to be invalidated if JT made any changes.
In fact, JT doesn't use any information from BPI/BFI for the sake of the transformation itself. It only creates BPI/BFI to keep them up to date. But since it updates local copies (besides cases when it updates profile metadata) it just waste of time.

Current patch is a rework of D124439. D124439 makes one step and replaces local copies with global ones retrieved through AnalysisPassManager. Here we do one more step and don't create BPI/BFI if the only reason of creation is to keep BPI/BFI up to date. Overall logic is the following. If there is cached BPI/BFI then update it along the transformations. If there is no existing BPI/BFI, then create it only if it is required to update profile metadata.

Please note if BPI/BFI exists on exit from JT (either cached or created) it is always up to date and no reason to invalidate it.

Reviewed By: mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136827
2023-02-16 16:08:34 +07:00
Ben Mudd
e0374fb2f4 [DebugInfo] Make debug intrinsics to track cloned values in JumpThreading
This patch causes debug value intrinsics outside of cloned blocks in the
Jump Threading pass to correctly point towards any derived values. If it cannot,
it kills them.

Reviewed By: probinson, StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140404
2023-02-01 12:52:37 +00:00
Evgeniy Brevnov
f7c1982309 Revert "[JT][CT] Preserve exisiting BPI/BFI during JumpThreading"
This reverts commit 26e7cb24cb5dfa560683064d37f560558f00aa67.
2023-01-27 15:35:32 +07:00
Evgeniy Brevnov
26e7cb24cb [JT][CT] Preserve exisiting BPI/BFI during JumpThreading
Currently, JT creates and updates local instances of BPI\BFI. As a result global ones have to be invalidated if JT made any changes.
In fact, JT doesn't use any information from BPI/BFI for the sake of the transformation itself. It only creates BPI/BFI to keep them up to date. But since it updates local copies (besides cases when it updates profile metadata) it just waste of time.

Current patch is a rework of D124439. D124439 makes one step and replaces local copies with global ones retrieved through AnalysisPassManager. Here we do one more step and don't create BPI/BFI if the only reason of creation is to keep BPI/BFI up to date. Overall logic is the following. If there is cached BPI/BFI then update it along the transformations. If there is no existing BPI/BFI, then create it only if it is required to update profile metadata.

Please note if BPI/BFI exists on exit from JT (either cached or created) it is always up to date and no reason to invalidate it.

Reviewed By: mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136827
2023-01-27 15:00:16 +07:00
Max Kazantsev
82cee24e3d [JumpThreading] Preserve profile metadata during select unfolding, take 2
Jump threading can replace select and unconditional branch with
conditional branch, but when doing so loses profile information.

This destructive transform can eventually lead to a performance
degradation due to folding of branches in
shouldFoldCondBranchesToCommonDestination as branch probabilities
are no longer known.

The first version was reverted due to assert caused by i32 overflow,
fixed in this version.

Patch by Roman Paukner!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138132
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
2023-01-16 19:04:23 +07:00
Dmitri Gribenko
0e9956204d Revert "[JumpThreading] Preserve profile metadata during select unfolding"
This reverts commit 957952dbf2f34ed552e8e1f8c35eed17eee2ea38.

Addition in the newly added code can overflow.  As a result, the
constructor of `BranchProbability()` can trigger an assertion. See
the discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D138132 for more details.
2023-01-10 11:54:50 +01:00
Alex Brachet
230dba0ad3 [JumpThreading] Fix test to require asserts 2023-01-09 22:51:08 +00:00
Ben Mudd
1f11d1bd12 [DebugInfo] Fix jump threading failing to update cloned dbg.values
This is a patch to fix duplicated dbg.values in the JumpThreading pass not
pointing towards their local value, and instead towards the variable in the
original block.
JumpThreadingPass::cloneInstructions is the changed function to target metadata
as well as normal cloned values.

Reviewed By: jmorse, StephenTozer

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140006
2023-01-09 11:42:33 +00:00
Max Kazantsev
957952dbf2 [JumpThreading] Preserve profile metadata during select unfolding
Jump threading can replace select and unconditional branch with
conditional branch, but when doing so loses profile information.

This destructive transform can eventually lead to a performance
degradation due to folding of branches in
shouldFoldCondBranchesToCommonDestination as branch probabilities
are no longer known.

Patch by Roman Paukner!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138132
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
2023-01-09 16:14:58 +07:00
Yingchi Long
84733b0f17
[JT] check xor operand is exactly the same in processBranchOnXOR
Reproducer:

    ; RUN: opt -S -jump-threading < %s
    define void @test() {
    entry:
    br i1 false, label %loop, label %exit

    loop:
    %bool = phi i1 [ %xor, %loop.latch ], [ false, %entry ]
    %cmp = icmp eq i16 0, 1
    %xor = xor i1 %cmp, %bool
    br i1 %bool, label %loop.latch, label %exit

    loop.latch:
    %dummy = phi i16 [ 0, %loop ]
    br label %loop

    exit:
    ret void
    }

On this occassion, phi node %bool is actually %xor, and doing substitution causes assertion failure.

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58812

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139783
2022-12-21 21:43:55 +08:00
Bjorn Pettersson
3528e63d89 [test] Remove duplicate RUN lines in Transform tests 2022-12-08 11:47:16 +01:00
Roman Lebedev
b487f2e96f
[NFC] Port all JumpThreading tests to -passes= syntax 2022-12-08 02:38:45 +03:00
Matt Arsenault
b6909fe9ca JumpThreading: Modernize some test checking
Stop using tests with grep, or no output checks at all. Just use
FileCheck and generate checks. Also remove unnecessary requires
asserts.
2022-11-27 12:41:28 -05:00
Matt Arsenault
07e34d2de5 JumpThreading: Convert tests to -passes 2022-11-27 11:19:28 -05:00
Matt Arsenault
83d5052768 JumpThreading: Convert tests to opaque pointers
phi-known.ll:test2 required deleting one manual check for a bitcast

Also strip trailing whitespace while we're touching everything.
2022-11-27 11:19:28 -05:00
Evgeniy Brevnov
50f8eb05af Revert "[JT] Preserve exisiting BPI/BFI during JumpThreading"
This reverts commit 52a4018506e39f50d0c06ac5a1c987eb83b900c7.
2022-11-17 17:11:47 +07:00
Evgeniy Brevnov
52a4018506 [JT] Preserve exisiting BPI/BFI during JumpThreading
Currently, JT creates and updates local instances of BPI\BFI. As a result global ones have to be invalidated if JT made any changes.
In fact, JT doesn't use any information from BPI/BFI for the sake of the transformation itself. It only creates BPI/BFI to keep them up to date. But since it updates local copies (besides cases when it updates profile metadata) it just waste of time.

Current patch is a rework of D124439. D124439 makes one step and replaces local copies with global ones retrieved through AnalysisPassManager. Here we do one more step and don't create BPI/BFI if the only reason of creation is to keep BPI/BFI up to date. Overall logic is the following. If there is cached BPI/BFI then update it along the transformations. If there is no existing BPI/BFI, then create it only if it is required to update profile metadata.

Please note if BPI/BFI exists on exit from JT (either cached or created) it is always up to date and no reason to invalidate it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136827
2022-11-17 17:00:00 +07:00
Sebastian Peryt
46fc75ab28 [NFC][2/n] Remove PrunePH pass
Second patch in the series to remove legacy PM and
associated -enable-new-pm=0 flag targets pass that
has not been ported to new PM - PruneEH.
Discussion about this can be found in D44415.

Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134686
2022-09-26 18:38:04 -07:00
Sergey Kachkov
be37caca00 [JumpThreading] Process range comparisions with non-local cmp instructions
Use getPredicateOnEdge method if value is a non-local
compare-with-a-constant instruction, that can give more precise
results than getConstantOnEdge.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131956
2022-09-02 12:22:45 +02:00
Nikita Popov
ab6876a40d reland: [Local] Allow creating callbr with duplicate successors
Since D129288, callbr is allowed to have duplicate successors. This patch removes a limitation which prevents optimizations from actually producing such callbrs.

This is probably the riskiest of all the recent callbr changes, because code with incorrect assumptions might be lurking somewhere. I fixed the one case I encountered ahead of time in 8201e3ef5c.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129997

Originally landed as
commit 08860f525a23 ("[Local] Allow creating callbr with duplicate successors")

Reverted in
commit 1cf6b93df168 ("Revert "[Local] Allow creating callbr with duplicate successors"")
2022-08-31 13:23:00 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
1cf6b93df1 Revert "[Local] Allow creating callbr with duplicate successors"
This reverts commit 08860f525a2363ccd697ebb3ff59769e37b1be21.

Crashes during PPC64LE linux kernel builds as reported by @nathanchance.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129997#3663632
2022-07-19 15:03:27 -07:00
Nikita Popov
08860f525a [Local] Allow creating callbr with duplicate successors
Since D129288, callbr is allowed to have duplicate successors. This
patch removes a limitation which prevents optimizations from actually
producing such callbrs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129997
2022-07-19 14:28:22 +02:00
Nikita Popov
2a721374ae [IR] Don't use blockaddresses as callbr arguments
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:

    ; Before:
    %res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
    to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
    ; After:
    %res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
    to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]

The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:

* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
  clone-based optimizations
  (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
  (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)

This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
2022-07-15 10:18:17 +02:00
ChenYang Li
6d036b83d1 [JumpThreading] Avoid threadThroughTwoBasicBlocks when PredPred BB ends with indirectbranch
Since we can't change the destination of indirectbr, so when
encounter indirectbr as PredPredBB terminator, we should pass it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129193
2022-07-08 09:29:17 +02:00
Nikita Popov
40a4078e14 [BasicBlockUtils] Allow splitting predecessors with callbr terminators
SplitBlockPredecessors currently asserts if one of the predecessor
terminators is a callbr. This limitation was originally necessary,
because just like with indirectbr, it was not possible to replace
successors of a callbr. However, this is no longer the case since
D67252. As the requirement nowadays is that callbr must reference
all blockaddrs directly in the call arguments, and these get
automatically updated when setSuccessor() is called, we no longer
need this limitation.

The only thing we need to do here is use replaceSuccessorWith()
instead of replaceUsesOfWith(), because only the former does the
necessary blockaddr updating magic.

I believe there's other similar limitations that can be removed,
e.g. related to critical edge splitting.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129205
2022-07-07 09:13:25 +02:00
Arthur Eubanks
36096c2b38 [NFC][JumpThreading] Remove InsertFreezeWhenUnfoldingSelect pass parameter
All callers pass true.

select-unfold-freeze.ll is now a subset of select.ll so delete it.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126501
2022-05-26 16:13:34 -07:00
Nikita Popov
6f0ca6fd23 [JumpThreading] Insert freeze when unfolding select
JumpThreading may convert selects into branch instructions,
in which case the condition needs to be frozen (as branch on
poison is immediate undefined behavior, unlike select on poison).

The necessary code for this is already in place, this just enables
the option.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125869
2022-05-21 11:24:27 +02:00
Nikita Popov
c9e7049754 [JumpThreading] Look through freeze in getPredicateAt() fold
This code is valid for any icmp, so we can safely look through a
freeze when trying to find one.

A caveat here is that replaceFoldableUses() may not end up replacing
any uses in this case. It might make sense to use the freeze as the
context instruction (rather than the terminator) if there is a
freeze, to ensure that it always gets folded. This would require
some changes to how replaceFoldedUses() works though, as it
currently assumes that the value is valid at the end of the block.
2022-05-18 12:09:59 +02:00
Nikita Popov
bdf25477f6 [JumpThreading] Add additional freeze tests (NFC)
These are for the getPredicateAt() codepath.
2022-05-18 12:03:15 +02:00