Debugify is extremely useful as a testing and debugging tool, and a good
number of LLVM-IR transform tests use it. We need it to support "new"
non-instruction debug-info to get test coverage, but it's not important
enough to completely convert right now (and it'd be a large
undertaking). Thus: convert to/from dbg.value/DPValue mode on entry and
exit of the pass, which gives us the functionality without any further
work. The cost is compile-time, but again this is only happening during
tests.
Tested by: the large set of debugify tests enabled here. Note the
InstCombine test (cast-mul-select.ll) that hasn't been fully enabled:
this is because there's a debug-info sinking piece of code there that
hasn't been instrumented.
When IRBuilder is given an insertion position and there is debug-info, it
sets the DebugLoc of newly inserted instructions to the DebugLoc of the
insertion position. Unfortunately, that means if you insert in front of a
debug intrinsics, your "real" instructions get potentially-misleading
source locations from the debug intrinsics. Worse, if you compile -gmlt to
get source locations but no variable locations, you'll get different source
locations to a normal -g build, which is silly.
Rectify this with the getStableDebugLoc method, which skips over any debug
intrinsics to find the next "real" instruction. This is the source location
that you would get if you compile with -gmlt, and it remains stable in the
presence of debug intrinsics. The changed tests show a few locations where
this has been happening, for example selecting line-zero locations for
instrumentation on a perfectly valid call site.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159485
Clang OpenMP codegen tests are failing.
This reverts commit 288f1f8abe5835180a0021f142043ee261ab3846.
This reverts commit cb90e5356ac1594e95fed8e208d6e0e9b6a87db1.
There's precedent for that in `CreateOr()`/`CreateAnd()`.
The motivation here is to avoid bloating the run-time check's IR
in `SCEVExpander::generateOverflowCheck()`.
Refs. https://reviews.llvm.org/D109368#3089809
Nowadays LLVM does not assume that all loops are finite,
so if we want to produce a finite loop from a potentially-infinite one,
we must ensure that the original loop is known to be a finite one.
For this transform, it only matters for arithmetic right-shifts.
For them, either the function or the loop must be known to
be `mustprogress`, or the original value being shifted must be known
to be non-negative (because iff the sign bit was set,
it will never become zero, but will become `-1` in the "end").
It would be really good for alive2 to actually complain about this,
but it currently does not: https://github.com/AliveToolkit/alive2/issues/726
This adds support for the "count active bits" pattern, i.e.:
```
int countActiveBits(signed val) {
int cnt = 0;
for( ; (val >> cnt) != 0; ++cnt)
;
return cnt;
}
```
but a somewhat more general one:
```
int countActiveBits(signed val, int start, int off) {
int cnt;
for (cnt = start; val >> (cnt + off); cnt++)
;
return cnt;
}
```
This directly matches the existing 'logical right-shift until zero' idiom.
alive2 is happy with all the tests there.
Note that, again, much like with the original unsigned case,
we don't require the `val != 0` guard.
The old `detectShiftUntilZeroIdiom()` already supports this pattern,
the idea here is that the `val` must be positive (have at least one
leading zero), because otherwise the loop is non-terminating,
but since it is not `while(1)`, that would have been UB.
