7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov
970fcba074 [LoopVersioningLICM] Convert tests to opaque pointers (NFC) 2023-01-04 17:17:17 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
15fefcb9eb [opt] Directly translate -O# to -passes='default<O#>'
Right now when we see -O# we add the corresponding 'default<O#>' into
the list of passes to run when translating legacy -pass-name. This has
the side effect of not using the default AA pipeline.

Instead, treat -O# as -passes='default<O#>', but don't allow any other
-passes or -pass-name. I think we can keep `opt -O#` as shorthand for
`opt -passes='default<O#>` but disallow anything more than just -O#.

Tests need to be updated to not use `opt -O# -pass-name`.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112036
2021-10-18 16:48:10 -07:00
Nikita Popov
3dd8c9176b [LICM] Remove AST-based implementation
MSSA-based LICM has been enabled by default for a few years now.
This drops the old AST-based implementation. Using loop(licm) will
result in a fatal error, the use of loop-mssa(licm) is required
(or just licm, which defaults to loop-mssa).

Note that the core canSinkOrHoistInst() logic has to retain AST
support for now, because it is shared with LoopSink.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108244
2021-08-18 20:21:53 +02:00
TaWeiTu
65a36bbc3d [NPM] Port -loop-versioning-licm to NPM
Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89371
2020-10-24 21:51:18 +08:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Adam Nemet
54053a518e [LoopVersioningLICM] Add test coverage for llvm.loop.licm_versioning.disable
In the next change, I am generalizing the function
findStringMetadataForLoop and I want to make sure I don't break this.
Looks like there was no coverage for this so far.

llvm-svn: 267182
2016-04-22 18:34:50 +00:00