[mlir] Expose a mechanism to provide a callback for encoding types and attributes in MLIR bytecode.
Two callbacks are exposed, respectively, to the BytecodeWriterConfig and to the ParserConfig. At bytecode parsing/printing, clients have the ability to specify a callback to be used to optionally read/write the encoding. On failure, fallback path will execute the default parsers and printers for the dialect.
Testing shows how to leverage this functionality to support back-deployment and backward-compatibility usecases when roundtripping to bytecode a client dialect with type/attributes dependencies on upstream.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153383
[mlir] Expose a mechanism to provide a callback for encoding types and attributes in MLIR bytecode.
Two callbacks are exposed, respectively, to the BytecodeWriterConfig and to the ParserConfig. At bytecode parsing/printing, clients have the ability to specify a callback to be used to optionally read/write the encoding. On failure, fallback path will execute the default parsers and printers for the dialect.
Testing shows how to leverage this functionality to support back-deployment and backward-compatibility usecases when roundtripping to bytecode a client dialect with type/attributes dependencies on upstream.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153383
This makes the bytecode reader/writer work on big-endian platforms.
The only problem was related to encoding of multi-byte integers,
where both reader and writer code make implicit assumptions about
endianness of the host platform.
This fixes the current test failures on s390x, and in addition allows
to remove the UNSUPPORTED markers from all other bytecode-related
test cases - they now also all pass on s390x.
Also adding a GFAIL_SKIP to the MultiModuleWithResource unit test,
as this still fails due to an unrelated endian bug regarding
decoding of external resources.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153567
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, jpienaar, rriddle
This is adding a new interface (`BytecodeOpInterface`) to allow operations to
opt-in skipping conversion to attribute and serializing properties to native
bytecode.
The scheme relies on a new section where properties are stored in sequence
{ size, serialize_properties }, ...
The operations are storing the index of a properties, a table of offset is
built when loading the properties section the first time.
This is a re-commit of 837d1ce0dc which conflicted with another patch upgrading
the bytecode and the collision wasn't properly resolved before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151065
This reverts commit ca5a12fd69d4acf70c08f797cbffd714dd548348
and follow-up fixes:
df34c288c428eb4b867c8075def48b3d1727d60b
07dc906883af660780cf6d0cc1044f7e74dab83e
ab80ad0095083fda062c23ac90df84c40b4332c8
837d1ce0dc8eec5b17255291b3462e6296cb369b
The first commit was incomplete and broken, I'll prepare a new version
later, in the meantime pull this work out of tree.
This is adding a new interface (`BytecodeOpInterface`) to allow operations to
opt-in skipping conversion to attribute and serializing properties to native
bytecode.
The scheme relies on a new section where properties are stored in sequence
{ size, serialize_properties }, ...
The operations are storing the index of a properties, a table of offset is
built when loading the properties section the first time.
Back-deployment to version prior to 4 are relying on getAttrDictionnary() which
we intend to deprecate and remove: that is putting a de-factor end-of-support
horizon for supporting deployments to version older than 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151065
For block arg locs a common case is no/uknown location (where the producer
signifies they don't care about blockarg location). Also avoid needing to
dynamically resize opnames during parsing.
Assumed to be post lazy loading change, so chose version 3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151038
This patch implements a mechanism to read/write use-list orders from/to the mlir bytecode format. When producing bytecode, use-list orders are appended to each value of the IR. When reading bytecode, use-lists orders are loaded in memory and used at the end of parsing to sort the existing use-list chains.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149755
IsolatedRegions are emitted in sections in order for the reader to be
able to skip over them. A new class is exposed to manage the state and
allow the readers to load these IsolatedRegions on-demand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149515
A dialect can opt-in to handle versioning through the
`BytecodeDialectInterface`. Few hooks are exposed to the dialect to allow
managing a version encoded into the bytecode file. The version is loaded
lazily and allows to retrieve the version information while parsing the input
IR, and gives an opportunity to each dialect for which a version is present
to perform IR upgrades post-parsing through the `upgradeFromVersion` method.
Custom Attribute and Type encodings can also be upgraded according to the
dialect version using readAttribute and readType methods.
There is no restriction on what kind of information a dialect is allowed to
encode to model its versioning. Currently, versioning is supported only for
bytecode formats.
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143647
Resources are encoded in two separate sections similarly to
attributes/types, one for the actual data and one for the data
offsets. Unlike other sections, the resource sections are optional
given that in many cases they won't be present. For testing,
bytecode serialization is added for DenseResourceElementsAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132729
Some tests still pass even though we don't claim big-endian support. Using
UNSUPPORTED is a better indicator than XFAIL that we don't guarantee that
the tests work.
This commit adds a new bytecode serialization format for MLIR.
The actual serialization of MLIR to binary is relatively straightforward,
given the very very general structure of MLIR. The underlying basis for
this format is a variable-length encoding for integers, which gets heavily
used for nearly all aspects of the encoding (given that most of the encoding
is just indexing into lists).
The format currently does not provide support for custom attribute/type
serialization, and thus always uses an assembly format fallback. It also
doesn't provide support for resources. These will be added in followups,
the intention for this patch is to provide something that supports the
basic cases, and can be built on top of.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-a-binary-serialization-format-for-mlir/63518
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131747
