This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This is useful where tests previously encoded information in the name
names of ranges and points. Currently, this is pretty limited because
names consist of only alphanumeric characters and '_'.
With this patch, we can keep the names simple and attach optional
payloads to ranges and points instead.
The new syntax should be fully backwards compatible (if I haven't missed
anything). I tested this against clangd unit tests and everything still passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137909
Providing access to the mapping of annotations allows test helpers to
be expressive by using the annotations as expectations. For example, a
matcher could verify that all annotated points were matched by a
matcher, or that an refactoring surgically modifies specific ranges.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134072
- Infrastructure to support modifiers (protocol etc)
- standard modifiers:
- declaration (but no definition, yet)
- deprecated
- readonly (based on a fairly fuzzy const checking)
- static (for class members and locals, but *not* file-scope things!)
- abstract (for C++ classes, and pure-virtual methods)
- nonstandard modifier:
- deduced (on "auto" whose Kind is Class etc)
Happy to drop this if it's controversial at all.
- While here, update sample tweak to use our internal names, in
anticipation of theia TM scopes going away.
This addresses some of the goals of D77702, but leaves some things undone.
Mostly because I think these will want some discussion.
- no split between dependent type/name.
(We may want to model this as a modifier, type+dependent vs ???+dependent)
- no split between primitive/typedef.
(Is introducing a nonstandard kind is worth this distinction?)
- no nonstandard local attribute
This probably makes sense, I'm wondering if we want others and how
they fit together.
There's one minor regression in explicit template specialization declarations
due to a latent bug in findExplicitReferences, but fixing it after seems OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77811
Summary:
Annotations allow writing nice-looking unit test code when one needs
access to locations from the source code, e.g. running code completion
at particular offsets in a file. See comments in Annotations.cpp for
more details on the API.
Also got rid of a duplicate annotations parsing code in clang's code
complete tests.
Reviewers: gribozavr, sammccall
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59814
llvm-svn: 359179
