11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Momchil Velikov
d0ea42a7c1 [AArch64] Async unwind - function epilogues
Reviewed By: MaskRay, chill

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112330
2022-04-12 16:50:50 +01:00
Momchil Velikov
50a97aacac [AArch64] Async unwind - function prologues
Re-commit of 32e8b550e5439c7e4aafa73894faffd5f25d0d05

This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.

The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:

```
stp	x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!           // 16-byte Folded Spill
mov	x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```

after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes

A correct unwind info could look like:
```
stp	x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!           // 16-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
mov	x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```

Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
`-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.

Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
2022-03-24 16:16:44 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
85c53c7092 Revert "[AArch64] Async unwind - function prologues"
It caused builds to assert with:

  (StackSize == 0 && "We already have the CFA offset!"),
  function generateCompactUnwindEncoding, file AArch64AsmBackend.cpp, line 624.

when targeting iOS. See comment on the code review for reproducer.

> This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
> DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
>
> The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
> function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
> but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
> at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
>
> ```
> stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!           // 16-byte Folded Spill
> mov     x29, sp
> .cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
> ...
> ```
>
> after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
> the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
>
> A correct unwind info could look like:
> ```
> stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!           // 16-byte Folded Spill
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> mov     x29, sp
> .cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
> ...
> ```
>
> Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
> sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
> goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
> `-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
>
> Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411

This reverts commit 32e8b550e5439c7e4aafa73894faffd5f25d0d05.
2022-03-04 17:36:26 +01:00
Momchil Velikov
63c9aca12a Revert "[AArch64] Async unwind - function epilogues"
This reverts commit 74319d67943a4fbef36e81f54273549ce4962f84.

It causes test failures that look like infinite loop in asan/hwasan
unwinding.
2022-03-02 15:01:57 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
74319d6794 [AArch64] Async unwind - function epilogues
Counterpart of https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411 this change makes the
unwind information instruction precise in function epilogues.

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112330
2022-03-02 13:15:11 +00:00
Momchil Velikov
32e8b550e5 [AArch64] Async unwind - function prologues
This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.

The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:

```
stp	x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!           // 16-byte Folded Spill
mov	x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```

after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes

A correct unwind info could look like:
```
stp	x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!           // 16-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
mov	x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```

Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
`-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.

Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
2022-02-28 13:37:57 +00:00
Paul Robinson
c161775dec [FastISel] Flush local value map on every instruction
Local values are constants or addresses that can't be folded into
the instruction that uses them. FastISel materializes these in a
"local value" area that always dominates the current insertion
point, to try to avoid materializing these values more than once
(per block).

https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093 added code to sink these local
value instructions to their first use, which has two beneficial
effects. One, it is likely to avoid some unnecessary spills and
reloads; two, it allows us to attach the debug location of the
user to the local value instruction. The latter effect can
improve the debugging experience for debuggers with a "set next
statement" feature, such as the Visual Studio debugger and PS4
debugger, because instructions to set up constants for a given
statement will be associated with the appropriate source line.

There are also some constants (primarily addresses) that could be
produced by no-op casts or GEP instructions; the main difference
from "local value" instructions is that these are values from
separate IR instructions, and therefore could have multiple users
across multiple basic blocks. D43093 avoided sinking these, even
though they were emitted to the same "local value" area as the
other instructions. The patch comment for D43093 states:

  Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the
  register to the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups
  map direction, we don't have enough information to sink these
  instructions.

This patch undoes most of D43093, and instead flushes the local
value map after(*) every IR instruction, using that instruction's
debug location. This avoids sometimes incorrect locations used
previously, and emits instructions in a more natural order.

In addition, constants materialized due to PHI instructions are
not assigned a debug location immediately; instead, when the
local value map is flushed, if the first local value instruction
has no debug location, it is given the same location as the
first non-local-value-map instruction.  This prevents PHIs
from introducing unattributed instructions, which would either
be implicitly attributed to the location for the preceding IR
instruction, or given line 0 if they are at the beginning of
a machine basic block.  Neither of those consequences is good
for debugging.

This does mean materialized values are not re-used across IR
instruction boundaries; however, only about 5% of those values
were reused in an experimental self-build of clang.

(*) Actually, just prior to the next instruction. It seems like
it would be cleaner the other way, but I was having trouble
getting that to work.

This reapplies commits cf1c774d and dc35368c, and adds the
modification to PHI handling, which should avoid problems
with debugging under gdb.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91734
2021-01-11 08:32:36 -08:00
David Blaikie
615f63e149 Revert "[FastISel] Flush local value map on ever instruction" and dependent patches
This reverts commit cf1c774d6ace59c5adc9ab71b31e762c1be695b1.

This change caused several regressions in the gdb test suite - at least
a sample of which was due to line zero instructions making breakpoints
un-lined. I think they're worth investigating/understanding more (&
possibly addressing) before moving forward with this change.

Revert "[FastISel] NFC: Clean up unnecessary bookkeeping"
This reverts commit 3fd39d3694d32efa44242c099e923a7f4d982095.

Revert "[FastISel] NFC: Remove obsolete -fast-isel-sink-local-values option"
This reverts commit a474657e30edccd9e175d92bddeefcfa544751b2.

Revert "Remove static function unused after cf1c774."
This reverts commit dc35368ccf17a7dca0874ace7490cc3836fb063f.

Revert "[lldb] Fix TestThreadStepOut.py after "Flush local value map on every instruction""
This reverts commit 53a14a47ee89dadb8798ca8ed19848f33f4551d5.
2020-12-01 14:26:23 -08:00
Paul Robinson
cf1c774d6a [FastISel] Flush local value map on ever instruction
Local values are constants or addresses that can't be folded into
the instruction that uses them. FastISel materializes these in a
"local value" area that always dominates the current insertion
point, to try to avoid materializing these values more than once
(per block).

https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093 added code to sink these local
value instructions to their first use, which has two beneficial
effects. One, it is likely to avoid some unnecessary spills and
reloads; two, it allows us to attach the debug location of the
user to the local value instruction. The latter effect can
improve the debugging experience for debuggers with a "set next
statement" feature, such as the Visual Studio debugger and PS4
debugger, because instructions to set up constants for a given
statement will be associated with the appropriate source line.

There are also some constants (primarily addresses) that could be
produced by no-op casts or GEP instructions; the main difference
from "local value" instructions is that these are values from
separate IR instructions, and therefore could have multiple users
across multiple basic blocks. D43093 avoided sinking these, even
though they were emitted to the same "local value" area as the
other instructions. The patch comment for D43093 states:

  Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the
  register to the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups
  map direction, we don't have enough information to sink these
  instructions.

This patch undoes most of D43093, and instead flushes the local
value map after(*) every IR instruction, using that instruction's
debug location. This avoids sometimes incorrect locations used
previously, and emits instructions in a more natural order.

This does mean materialized values are not re-used across IR
instruction boundaries; however, only about 5% of those values
were reused in an experimental self-build of clang.

(*) Actually, just prior to the next instruction. It seems like
it would be cleaner the other way, but I was having trouble
getting that to work.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91734
2020-11-25 13:05:00 -05:00
Fangrui Song
502a77f125 Migrate function attribute "no-frame-pointer-elim" to "frame-pointer"="all" as cleanups after D56351 2019-12-24 15:57:33 -08:00
Kiran Chandramohan
965ed1e974 [AArch64] Fix issues with large arrays on stack
Summary:
This patch fixes a few issues when large arrays are allocated on the
stack. Currently, clang has inconsistent behaviour, for debug builds
there is an assertion failure when the array size on stack is around 2GB
but there is no assertion when the stack is around 8GB. For release
builds there is no assertion, the compilation succeeds but generates
incorrect code. The incorrect code generated is due to using
int/unsigned int instead of their 64-bit counterparts. This patch,
1) Removes the assertion in frame legality check.
2) Converts int/unsigned int in some places to the 64-bit variants. This
helps in generating correct code and removes the inconsistent behaviour.
3) Adds a test which runs without optimisations.

Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, fhahn, aemerson

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: eli.friedman, fpetrogalli, kristof.beyls, hiraditya,
llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70496
2019-12-10 11:44:41 +00:00