6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chen Zheng
b5e1fc19da [PowerPC] don't check CTR clobber in hardware loop insertion pass
We added a new post-isel CTRLoop pass in D122125. That pass will expand
the hardware loop related intrinsic to CTR loop or normal loop based
on the loop context. So we don't need to conservatively check the CTR
clobber now on the IR level.

Reviewed By: lkail

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135847
2022-12-04 20:53:49 -05:00
Chen Zheng
5f4927da77 [PowerPC][NFC] refactor some test cases. 2022-10-12 12:19:52 +00:00
Kai Nacke
427fb35192 [PPC] Opaque pointer migration, part 1.
The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov. Due to the size of the change it is split into
several parts.

Reviewed By: nemanja, amyk, nikic, PowerPC

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135470
2022-10-11 17:24:06 +00:00
Ehsan Amiri
a538b0f023 Adding -verify-machineinstrs option to PowerPC tests
Currently we have a number of tests that fail with -verify-machineinstrs.
To detect this cases earlier we add the option to the testcases with the
exception of tests that will currently fail with this option. PR 27456 keeps
track of this failures.

No code review, as discussed with Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 277624
2016-08-03 18:17:35 +00:00
David Blaikie
a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
Hal Finkel
c4c6c87666 [PowerPC] On PPC32, 128-bit shifts might be runtime calls
The counter-loops formation pass needs to know what operations might be
function calls (because they can't appear in counter-based loops). On PPC32,
128-bit shifts might be runtime calls (even though you can't use __int128 on
PPC32, it seems that SROA might form them).

Fixes PR19709.

llvm-svn: 208501
2014-05-11 16:23:29 +00:00