The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov. Due to the size of the change it is split into
several parts.
Reviewed By: nemanja, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135474
Map hardware loop intrinsics loop_decrement and set_loop_iteration
to the new PowerPC pseudo instructions, so that the hardware loop
intrinsics will be expanded to normal cmp+branch form or ctrloop
form based on the CTR register usage on MIR level.
Reviewed By: lkail
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123366
This reverts commit 329aeb5db43f5e69df038fb20d2def77fe6f8595,
and relands commit 61f006ac655431bd44b9e089f74c73bec0c1a48c.
This is a continuation of D89456.
As it was suggested there, now that SCEV models `PtrToInt`,
we can try to improve SCEV's pointer handling.
In particular, i believe, i will need this in the future
to further fix `SCEVAddExpr`operation type handling.
This removes special handling of `ConstantPointerNull`
from `ScalarEvolution::createSCEV()`, and add constant folding
into `ScalarEvolution::getPtrToIntExpr()`.
This way, `null` constants stay as such in SCEV's,
but gracefully become zero integers when asked.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98147
This is a continuation of D89456.
As it was suggested there, now that SCEV models `PtrToInt`,
we can try to improve SCEV's pointer handling.
In particular, i believe, i will need this in the future
to further fix `SCEVAddExpr`operation type handling.
This removes special handling of `ConstantPointerNull`
from `ScalarEvolution::createSCEV()`, and add constant folding
into `ScalarEvolution::getPtrToIntExpr()`.
This way, `null` constants stay as such in SCEV's,
but gracefully become zero integers when asked.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98147
Summary:
This is exposed by functional testing on PowerPC.
In some pipelined loops, Phi refer to phi did not get value defined by
the Phi, hence getting wrong value later.
As the comment mentioned, we should "use the value defined by the Phi,
unless we're generating the firstepilog and the Phi refers to a Phi
in a different stage.", so Phi refering to same stage Phi should use
the value defined by the Phi here.
Reviewers: bcahoon, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: MaskRay, wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64035
llvm-svn: 365428
