Noticed while trying to use llvm-exegesis to get some accurate capture numbers on some old Atom/Silverment hardware as part of the work with D103695.
These targets' frontends are particularly poor and the use of the xmm8-xmm15 SSE registers results in longer instruction encodings which were affecting the latency/throughput estimates.
Thanks to @lebedev.ri for the --skip-measurements command line argument which made testing much easier!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138832
Sometimes we only want to ensure that we can produce snippets (all the way
through `SnippetRepetitor`!), but don't care for the execution.
E.g. all of our tests are this way.
I've built LLVM without PFM and removed my CPU from `X86PfmCounters.td`,
and this produces the expected results in that configuration.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139448
Before performing this change, I checked that `ByteAlignment` was never `0` inside `MCAsmStreamer:emitZeroFill` and `MCAsmStreamer::emitLocalCommonSymbol`.
I believe it is NFC as `0` values are illegal in `emitZeroFill` anyways, `Log2(ByteAlignment)` would be undefined.
And currently, all calls to `emitLocalCommonSymbol` are provably `>0`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139439
This breaks Windows bots with
`warning C4334: '<<': result of 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift intended?)`
Some shift operators are lacking a proper literal unit ('1ULL' instead of
'1'). Will reland once fixed.
This reverts commit c621c1a8e81856e6bf2be79714767d80466e9ede.
Before performing this change, I checked that `ByteAlignment` was never `0` inside `MCAsmStreamer:emitZeroFill` and `MCAsmStreamer::emitLocalCommonSymbol`.
I believe it is NFC as `0` values are illegal in `emitZeroFill` anyways, `Log2(ByteAlignment)` would be undefined.
And currently, all calls to `emitLocalCommonSymbol` are provably `>0`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139439
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
getNonRedundantWriteProcRes was assuming that tblgen topologically sorted the cpu ModelProcResources[] arrays so that resource units were declared before the resource groups that used them, but unfortunately that doesn't appear to be true - in most cases it was just getting lucky based off the alphanumeric sorting that was being performed and the choice of the resource pipe names in most scheduler models (Intel models in particular).
This patch adds an explicit sort, based off llvm-mca's initializeUsedResources, that sorts by resource mask - I'm hoping this basic sorting is enough, I don't think overlapping groups or Super resources are a problem.
I'd like to take this further in the future and start sharing more code between llvm-mca and llvm-exegesis - while triaging this bug I saw how similar both approaches are, but are just dissimilar enough that any refactor isn't going to be trivial :(
Working with @courbet on a follow up unit test
Fixes#58500Fixes#37045
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136351
Enable registration of multiple exegesis targets at once. Use idiomatic approach to defining target select macros, but leave code in the llvm-mca sub-directories for now.
This is a stepping stone towards allowing llvm-exegesis benchmarking via simulator or testing in non-target dependent tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133605
We were using the native triple to parse the benchmarks. Use the triple
from the benchmarks file.
Right now this still only allows analyzing files produced by the current
target until D133605 is in.
This also makes the `Analysis` class much less ad-hoc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133697
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/56/builds/3201 failed with a link error being unable to initialize the disassembler. Oddly, this bot is the *only* bot which appears to have failed in this way. (A bunch sent warnings, but that appears to be spurious due to cmake rebuilds on incremental bots.) Why only polly would witness this is an excercise for the reader - because I have no clue.
llvm-exegesis is rather odd in the LLVM ecosystem in code is selectively compiled based on the native machine. LLVM is cross compiler by default, so this stands out as odd. It's also less then helpful when working on code for a target other than your native dev environment.
This change only changes the build setup. A later change will enable -march support to allow actual benchmarking under e.g. simulators in a cross compilation environment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133150
A simple sed doing these substitutions:
- `${LLVM_BINARY_DIR}/(\$\{CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/)?lib(${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})?\>` -> `${LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR}`
- `${LLVM_BINARY_DIR}/(\$\{CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/)?bin\>` -> `${LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR}`
where `\>` means "word boundary".
The only manual modifications were reverting changes in
- `compiler-rt/cmake/Modules/CompilerRTUtils.cmake
- `runtimes/CMakeLists.txt`
because these were "entry points" where we wanted to tread carefully not not introduce a "loop" which would end with an undefined variable being expanded to nothing.
This hopefully increases readability overall, and also decreases the usages of `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX`, preparing us for D130586.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132316
As usual with that header cleanup series, some implicit dependencies now need to
be explicit:
llvm/MC/MCParser/MCAsmParser.h no longer includes llvm/MC/MCParser/MCAsmLexer.h
Preprocessed lines to build llvm on my setup:
after: 1068185081
before: 1068324320
So no compile time benefit to expect, but we still get the looser coupling
between files which is great.
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119359
By default `llvm::seq` would happily iterate over enums, which may be unsafe if the enum values are not continuous. This patch disable enum iteration with `llvm::seq` and `llvm::seq_inclusive` and adds two new functions: `enum_seq` and `enum_seq_inclusive`.
To make sure enum iteration is safe, we require users to declare their enum types as iterable by specializing `enum_iteration_traits<SomeEnum>`. Because it's not always possible to add these traits next to enum definition (e.g., for enums defined in external libraries), we provide an escape hatch to allow iteration on per-callsite basis by passing `force_iteration_on_noniterable_enum`.
The main benefit of this approach is that these global declarations via traits can appear just next to enum definitions, making easy to spot when enums are miss-labeled, e.g., after introducing new enum values, whereas `force_iteration_on_noniterable_enum` should stand out and be easy to grep for.
This emerged from a discussion with gchatelet@ about reusing llvm's `Sequence.h` in lieu of https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/llpc/blob/dev/lgc/interface/lgc/EnumIterator.h.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, gchatelet, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107378
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
Currently native clusterization simply groups all benchmarks
by the opcode of key instruction, but that is suboptimal in certain cases,
e.g. where we can already tell that the particular instructions
already resolve into different sched classes.
In the case of no tied variables, we pick random defs, and then random uses that don't alias with defs we just picked.
Sounds good, except that an X86 instruction may have implicit reg uses,
e.g. for `MULX` it's `EDX`/`RDX`: `Intel SDM, 4-162 Vol. 2B MULX — Unsigned Multiply Without Affecting Flags`
> Performs an unsigned multiplication of the implicit source operand (EDX/RDX) and the specified source operand
> (the third operand) and stores the low half of the result in the second destination (second operand), the high half
> of the result in the first destination operand (first operand), without reading or writing the arithmetic flags.
And indeed, every once in a while `llvm-exegesis` happened to pick EDX as a def while measuring throughput,
and producing garbage output:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis -num-repetitions=1000000 -mode=inverse_throughput -repetition-mode=min --loop-body-size=4096 -dump-object-to-disk=false -opcode-name=MULX32rr --max-configs-per-opcode=65536
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'MULX32rr EDX R11D R12D'
config: ''
register_initial_values:
- 'R12D=0x0'
- 'EDX=0x0'
cpu_name: znver3
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 4.00014, per_snippet_value: 4.00014 }
error: ''
info: instruction has no tied variables picking Uses different from defs
assembled_snippet: 415441BC00000000BA00000000C4C223F6D4C4C223F6D4C4C223F6D4C4C223F6D4415CC3415441BC00000000BA0000000049B80200000000000000C4C223F6D4C4C223F6D44983C0FF75F0415CC3
...
```
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis -num-repetitions=1000000 -mode=inverse_throughput -repetition-mode=min --loop-body-size=4096 -dump-object-to-disk=false -opcode-name=MULX32rr --max-configs-per-opcode=65536
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'MULX32rr R13D EDX ECX'
config: ''
register_initial_values:
- 'ECX=0x0'
- 'EDX=0x0'
cpu_name: znver3
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 3.00013, per_snippet_value: 3.00013 }
error: ''
info: instruction has no tied variables picking Uses different from defs
assembled_snippet: 4155B900000000BA00000000C4626BF6E9C4626BF6E9C4626BF6E9C4626BF6E9415DC34155B900000000BA0000000049B80200000000000000C4626BF6E9C4626BF6E94983C0FF75F0415DC3
...
```
Oops! Not only does that not look fun, i did hit that pitfail during AMD Zen 3 enablement.
While i have since then addressed this in rGd4d459e7475b4bb0d15280f12ed669342fa5edcd,
i suspect there may be other buggy results lying around, so we should at least stop producing them.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109275
This reverts commit 9588b685c6b2d90e4b6dd68e02e6a44affd77c3f. Breaks a bunch of builds.
Reviewed By: GMNGeoffrey
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108658
The implementation uses the int_asan_check_memaccess intrinsic to instrument the code. The intrinsic is replaced by a call to a function which performs the access check. The generated function names encode the input register name as a number using Reg - X86::NoRegister formula.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107850
These tests access private symbols in the backends, so they cannot link
against libLLVM.so and must be statically linked. Linking these tests
can be slow and with debug builds the resulting binaries use a lot of
disk space.
By merging them into a single test binary means we now only need to
statically link 1 test instead of 6, which helps reduce the build
times and saves disk space.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106464
This patch allows iterating typed enum via the ADT/Sequence utility.
It also changes the original design to better separate concerns:
- `StrongInt` only deals with safe `intmax_t` operations,
- `SafeIntIterator` presents the iterator and reverse iterator
interface but only deals with safe `StrongInt` internally.
- `iota_range` only deals with `SafeIntIterator` internally.
This design ensures that operations are always valid. In particular,
"Out of bounds" assertions fire when:
- the `value_type` is not representable as an `intmax_t`
- iterator operations make internal computation underflow/overflow
- the internal representation cannot be converted back to `value_type`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106279
Details:
Switch all #includes to use <> because that is consistent with what happens in the cmake checks.
Otherwise, we could be in the situation where cmake checks see that headers exist at <perfmon/...>
but in llvm-exegesis code, we use "perfmon/...", which may not exist.
Related PR/revisions: D84076, PR51017+D105615
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105861
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
