Up until now PDL(L) has not supported dialect conversion because we had no
way of remapping values or integrating with type conversions. This commit
rectifies that by adding a new "pattern configuration" concept to PDL. This
essentially allows for attaching external configurations to patterns, which
can hook into pattern events (for now just the scope of a rewrite, but we
could also pass configs to native rewrites as well). This allows for injecting
the type converter into the conversion pattern rewriter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133142
The current translation uses the old "ugly"/"raw" form which used PDLValue for the arguments
and results. This commit updates the C++ generation to use the recently added sugar that
allows for directly using the desired types for the arguments and result of PDL functions.
In addition, this commit also properly imports the C++ class for ODS operations, constraints,
and interfaces. This allows for a much more convienent C++ API than previously granted
with the raw/low-level types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124817
This commit refactors the expected form of native constraint and rewrite
functions, and greatly reduces the necessary user complexity required when
defining a native function. Namely, this commit adds in automatic processing
of the necessary PDLValue glue code, and allows for users to define
constraint/rewrite functions using the C++ types that they actually want to
use.
As an example, lets see a simple example rewrite defined today:
```
static void rewriteFn(PatternRewriter &rewriter, PDLResultList &results,
ArrayRef<PDLValue> args) {
ValueRange operandValues = args[0].cast<ValueRange>();
TypeRange typeValues = args[1].cast<TypeRange>();
...
// Create an operation at some point and pass it back to PDL.
Operation *op = rewriter.create<SomeOp>(...);
results.push_back(op);
}
```
After this commit, that same rewrite could be defined as:
```
static Operation *rewriteFn(PatternRewriter &rewriter ValueRange operandValues,
TypeRange typeValues) {
...
// Create an operation at some point and pass it back to PDL.
return rewriter.create<SomeOp>(...);
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122086
This support has never really worked well, and is incredibly clunky to
use (it effectively creates two argument APIs), and clunky to generate (it isn't
clear how we should actually expose this from PDL frontends). Treating these
as just attribute arguments is much much cleaner in every aspect of the stack.
If we need to optimize lots of constant parameters, it would be better to
investigate internal representation optimizations (e.g. batch attribute creation),
that do not affect the user (we want a clean external API).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121569
This commits adds a C++ generator to PDLL that generates wrapper PDL patterns
directly usable in C++ code, and also generates the definitions of native constraints/rewrites
that have code bodies specified in PDLL. This generator is effectively the PDLL equivalent of
the current DRR generator, and will allow easy replacement of DRR patterns with PDLL patterns.
A followup will start to utilize this for end-to-end integration testing and show case how to
use this as a drop-in replacement for DRR tablegen usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119781
