13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff Niu
c48e0cf03a [mlir] Remove TypedAttr and ElementsAttr from DenseArrayAttr
This patch removes the implementation of TypedAttr and ElementsAttr
from DenseArrayAttr and, in doing so, removes the need store a shaped
type. The attribute now stores a size (number of elements), an MLIR type
as a discriminator, and a raw byte array.

The intent of DenseArrayAttr was not to be a drop-in replacement for DenseElementsAttr. It was meant to be a simple container of integers or floats that map to C++ types. The ElementsAttr implementation on DenseArrayAttr had many holes in it, and fixing those holes would require evolving DenseArrayAttr in a way that is incompatible with its original purpose.

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137606
2022-12-05 13:27:55 -08:00
Jeff Niu
5cf5708628 [mlir][ElementsAttr] Change value_begin_impl to try_value_begin_impl
This patch changes `value_begin_impl` to a faillable
`try_value_begin_impl` so that specific cases can fail iteration if the
type doesn't match the internal storage.

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132904
2022-08-30 14:12:46 -07:00
Jeff Niu
cec7e80ebd [mlir] Make DenseArrayAttr generic
This patch turns `DenseArrayBaseAttr` into a fully-functional attribute by
adding a generic parser and printer, supporting bool or integer and floating
point element types with bitwidths divisible by 8. It has been renamed
to `DenseArrayAttr`. The patch maintains the specialized subclasses,
e.g. `DenseI32ArrayAttr`, which remain the preferred API for accessing
elements in C++.

This allows `DenseArrayAttr` to hold signed and unsigned integer elements:

```
array<si8: -128, 127>
array<ui8: 255>
```

"Exotic" floating point elements:

```
array<bf16: 1.2, 3.4>
```

And integers of other bitwidths:

```
array<i24: 8388607>
```

Reviewed By: rriddle, lattner

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132758
2022-08-30 13:29:24 -07:00
Jeff Niu
444683a9de [mlir] Remove the element type enum from DenseArrayAttr
The element type enum is not needed to differentiate dense array kinds
because the element type of the shaped type can be used instead.

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132535
2022-08-24 17:02:31 -07:00
Jeff Niu
d0541b4700 [mlir] Add I1 support to DenseArrayAttr
This patch adds a DenseI1ArrayAttr to support arrays of i1. Importantly,
the implementation is as a simple `ArrayRef<bool>` instead of using bit
compression, which was problematic in DenseElementsAttr.

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130957
2022-08-04 10:24:45 -04:00
Mehdi Amini
7faf75bb3e Introduce a new Dense Array attribute
This attribute is similar to DenseElementsAttr but does not support
splat. As such it has a much simpler API and does not need any smart
iterator: it exposes direct ArrayRef access.

A new syntax is introduced so that the generic printing/parsing looks
like:

  [:i64 1, -2, 3]

This attribute beings like an ArrayAttr but has a `:` token after the
opening square brace to introduce the element type (supported are I8,
I16, I32, I64, F32, F64) and the comma separated list for the data.

This is particularly convenient for attributes intended to be small,
like those referring to shapes.
For example a `transpose` operation with a `dims` attribute could be
defined as such:

  let arguments = (ins AnyTensor:$input, DenseI64ArrayAttr:$dims);
  let assemblyFormat = "$input `dims` `=` $dims attr-dict : type($input)";

And printed this way (the element type is elided in this case):

  transpose %input dims = [0, 2, 1] : tensor<2x3x4xf32>

The C++ API for dims would just directly return an ArrayRef<int64>

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-introduce-a-new-dense-array-attribute/63279

Recommit with a custom DenseArrayBaseAttrStorage class to ensure
over-alignment of the storage to the largest type.

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123774
2022-06-28 13:28:06 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
744d06e4f2 Revert "Introduce a new Dense Array attribute"
This reverts commit 508eb41d82ca956c30950d9a16b522a29aeeb333.

UBSAN indicates some pointer mis-alignment I need to investigate
2022-06-28 12:47:15 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
508eb41d82 Introduce a new Dense Array attribute
This attribute is similar to DenseElementsAttr but does not support
splat. As such it has a much simpler API and does not need any smart
iterator: it exposes direct ArrayRef access.

A new syntax is introduced so that the generic printing/parsing looks
like:

  [:i64 1, -2, 3]

This attribute beings like an ArrayAttr but has a `:` token after the
opening square brace to introduce the element type (supported are I8,
I16, I32, I64, F32, F64) and the comma separated list for the data.

This is particularly convenient for attributes intended to be small,
like those referring to shapes.
For example a `transpose` operation with a `dims` attribute could be
defined as such:

  let arguments = (ins AnyTensor:$input, DenseI64ArrayAttr:$dims);
  let assemblyFormat = "$input `dims` `=` $dims attr-dict : type($input)";

And printed this way (the element type is elided in this case):

  transpose %input dims = [0, 2, 1] : tensor<2x3x4xf32>

The C++ API for dims would just directly return an ArrayRef<int64>

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-introduce-a-new-dense-array-attribute/63279

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123774
2022-06-28 12:08:25 +00:00
River Riddle
36d3efea15 [mlir][NFC] Drop a few unnecessary includes from Pass.h 2022-04-07 23:42:47 -07:00
River Riddle
5e50dd048e [mlir] Rework the implementation of TypeID
This commit restructures how TypeID is implemented to ideally avoid
the current problems related to shared libraries. This is done by changing
the "implicit" fallback path to use the name of the type, instead of using
a static template variable (which breaks shared libraries). The major downside to this
is that it adds some additional initialization costs for the implicit path. Given the
use of type names for uniqueness in the fallback, we also no longer allow types
defined in anonymous namespaces to have an implicit TypeID. To simplify defining
an ID for these classes, a new `MLIR_DEFINE_EXPLICIT_INTERNAL_INLINE_TYPE_ID` macro
was added to allow for explicitly defining a TypeID directly on an internal class.

To help identify when types are using the fallback, `-debug-only=typeid` can be
used to log which types are using implicit ids.

This change generally only requires changes to the test passes, which are all defined
in anonymous namespaces, and thus can't use the fallback any longer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122775
2022-04-04 13:52:26 -07:00
Mehdi Amini
be0a7e9f27 Adjust "end namespace" comment in MLIR to match new agree'd coding style
See D115115 and this mailing list discussion:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-December/154199.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115309
2021-12-08 06:05:26 +00:00
River Riddle
0c7890c844 [mlir] Convert NamedAttribute to be a class
NamedAttribute is currently represented as an std::pair, but this
creates an extremely clunky .first/.second API. This commit
converts it to a class, with better accessors (getName/getValue)
and also opens the door for more convenient API in the future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113956
2021-11-18 05:39:29 +00:00
River Riddle
d80d3a358f [mlir] Refactor ElementsAttr into an AttrInterface
This revision refactors ElementsAttr into an Attribute Interface.
This enables a common interface with which to interact with
element attributes, without needing to modify the builtin
dialect. It also removes a majority (if not all?) of the need for
the current OpaqueElementsAttr, which was originally intended as
a way to opaquely represent data that was not representable by
the other builtin constructs.

The new ElementsAttr interface not only allows for users to
natively represent their data in the way that best suits them,
it also allows for efficient opaque access and iteration of the
underlying data. Attributes using the ElementsAttr interface
can directly expose support for interacting with the held
elements using any C++ data type they claim to support. For
example, DenseIntOrFpElementsAttr supports iteration using
various native C++ integer/float data types, as well as
APInt/APFloat, and more. ElementsAttr instances that refer to
DenseIntOrFpElementsAttr can use all of these data types for
iteration:

```c++
DenseIntOrFpElementsAttr intElementsAttr = ...;

ElementsAttr attr = intElementsAttr;
for (uint64_t value : attr.getValues<uint64_t>())
  ...;
for (APInt value : attr.getValues<APInt>())
  ...;
for (IntegerAttr value : attr.getValues<IntegerAttr>())
  ...;
```

ElementsAttr also supports failable range/iterator access,
allowing for selective code paths depending on data type
support:

```c++
ElementsAttr attr = ...;
if (auto range = attr.tryGetValues<uint64_t>()) {
  for (uint64_t value : *range)
    ...;
}
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109190
2021-09-21 01:57:43 +00:00