6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
River Riddle
3655069234 [mlir] Move the Builtin FuncOp to the Func dialect
This commit moves FuncOp out of the builtin dialect, and into the Func
dialect. This move has been planned in some capacity from the moment
we made FuncOp an operation (years ago). This commit handles the
functional aspects of the move, but various aspects are left untouched
to ease migration: func::FuncOp is re-exported into mlir to reduce
the actual API churn, the assembly format still accepts the unqualified
`func`. These temporary measures will remain for a little while to
simplify migration before being removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121266
2022-03-16 17:07:03 -07:00
chhzh123
036088fd6e [MLIR][Python] Add SCFIfOp Python binding
Current generated Python binding for the SCF dialect does not allow
users to call IfOp to create if-else branches on their own.
This PR sets up the default binding generation for scf.if operation
to address this problem.

Reviewed By: ftynse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121076
2022-03-13 05:24:10 +00:00
River Riddle
23aa5a7446 [mlir] Rename the Standard dialect to the Func dialect
The last remaining operations in the standard dialect all revolve around
FuncOp/function related constructs. This patch simply handles the initial
renaming (which by itself is already huge), but there are a large number
of cleanups unlocked/necessary afterwards:

* Removing a bunch of unnecessary dependencies on Func
* Cleaning up the From/ToStandard conversion passes
* Preparing for the move of FuncOp to the Func dialect

See the discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120624
2022-03-01 12:10:04 -08:00
Mogball
a54f4eae0e [MLIR] Replace std ops with arith dialect ops
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200

Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.

Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.

Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
2021-10-13 03:07:03 +00:00
Alex Zinenko
b164f23c29 [mlir][python] support taking ops instead of values in op constructors
Introduce support for accepting ops instead of values when constructing ops. A
single-result op can be used instead of a value, including in lists of values,
and any op can be used instead of a list of values. This is similar to, but
more powerful, than the C++ API that allows for implicitly casting an OpType to
Value if it is statically known to have a single result - the cast in Python is
based on the op dynamically having a single result, and also handles the
multi-result case. This allows to build IR in a more concise way:

    op = dialect.produce_multiple_results()
    other = dialect.produce_single_result()
    dialect.consume_multiple_results(other, op)

instead of having to access the results manually

    op = dialect.produce.multiple_results()
    other = dialect.produce_single_result()
    dialect.consume_multiple_results(other.result, op.operation.results)

The dispatch is implemented directly in Python and is triggered automatically
for autogenerated OpView subclasses. Extension OpView classes should use the
functions provided in ods_common.py if they want to implement this behavior.
An alternative could be to implement the dispatch in the C++ bindings code, but
it would require to forward opaque types through all Python functions down to a
binding call, which makes it hard to inspect them in Python, e.g., to obtain
the types of values.

Reviewed By: gysit

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111306
2021-10-08 09:49:48 +02:00
Alex Zinenko
8c1b785ce1 [mlir][python] provide bindings for the SCF dialect
This is an important core dialect that has not been exposed previously. Set up
the default bindings generation and provide a nicer wrapper for the `for` loop
with access to the loop configuration and body.

Depends On D110758

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110759
2021-09-30 09:38:15 +02:00