753 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Douglas Gregor
1abdf36a2c Eliminate TreeTransform::RebuildNestedNameSpecifier(), all four of
them, which are no longer used.

llvm-svn: 126855
2011-03-02 18:54:26 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
d4c41bcd7f Eliminate an unnecessary use of CXXScopeSpec::MakeTrivial. We have proper nested-name-specifier source-location information in DependentTemplateSpecializationTypeLocs now
llvm-svn: 126854
2011-03-02 18:52:42 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
fd35cde35e Kill off TreeTransform::TransformNestedNameSpecifier() in favor of the
source-location-preserving
TreeTransform::TranformNestedNameSpecifierLoc(). No functionality
change: the victim had no callers (that themselves had callers) anyway.

llvm-svn: 126853
2011-03-02 18:50:38 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
df846d11c1 Kill off the TreeTransform::TransformTemplateName overload that has
poor source-location information.

llvm-svn: 126852
2011-03-02 18:46:51 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
579c15f5d6 Kill off one of the TreeTransform::TransformTypeInObjectScope()
overloads (the one with the poor source-location information).

llvm-svn: 126851
2011-03-02 18:32:08 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
9db535035d Start migrating TreeTransform's TransformTemplateName over to version
that preserve source-location information. This commit adds more
redundancy than it removes; WIP.

llvm-svn: 126849
2011-03-02 18:07:45 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
9d80212115 Push nested-name-specifier source location information into template
template arguments. I believe that this is the last place in the AST
where we were storing a source range for a nested-name-specifier
rather than a proper nested-name-specifier location structure. (Yay!)

There is still a lot of cleanup to do in the TreeTransform, which
doesn't take advantage of nested-name-specifiers with source-location
information everywhere it could.

llvm-svn: 126844
2011-03-02 17:09:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
c52264e719 When we're substituting into a parameter-type-list nested inside the pattern
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.

llvm-svn: 126819
2011-03-02 02:04:06 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
a7a795bed1 Push nested-name-specifier source-location information into dependent
template specialization types. There are still a few rough edges to
clean up with some of the parser actions dropping
nested-name-specifiers too early.

llvm-svn: 126776
2011-03-01 20:11:18 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
844cb50266 Reinstate the introduction of source-location information for
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
 
  enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind

Fixes in this iteration include:

  (1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
  specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
  in a member access expression

    dep->template f<T>::f()

  This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
  checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
  specialization types). But the real problem was...

  (2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
  specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
  nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
  specialization types, but it was the source of the
  valgrind errors on the buildbots.
  

llvm-svn: 126765
2011-03-01 18:12:44 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
b3a58b08e0 Revert r126748, my second attempt at nested-name-specifier source
location information for elaborated types. *sigh*

llvm-svn: 126753
2011-03-01 17:25:47 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
bf5fe47b12 Reinstate r126737, extending the generation of type-source location
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.

The commit message from r126737:

Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".

Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.

With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.

llvm-svn: 126748
2011-03-01 16:31:39 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
62a60c50f4 Revert r126737, the most recent nested-name-specifier location change, for buildbot breakage.
llvm-svn: 126746
2011-03-01 15:34:37 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
9720642c68 Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".

Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.

With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.

llvm-svn: 126737
2011-03-01 03:11:17 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
3d0da5f5dd Push nested-name-specifier source location information into
DependentNameTypeLoc. Teach the recursive AST visitor and libclang how to
walk DependentNameTypeLoc nodes.

Also, teach libclang about TypedefDecl source ranges, so that we get
those. The massive churn in test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp
is a good thing: we're annotating a lot more of this test correctly
now.

llvm-svn: 126729
2011-03-01 01:34:45 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
9cbc22ba2d Teach Sema::CheckTypenameType to use nested-name-specifiers with
source-location information. We don't actually preserve this
information in any of the resulting TypeLocs (yet), so it doesn't
matter.

llvm-svn: 126693
2011-02-28 22:42:13 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
ea972d3faa Push nested-name-specifier location information into DeclRefExpr and
MemberExpr, the last of the expressions with qualifiers!

llvm-svn: 126688
2011-02-28 21:54:11 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
0da1d43e16 Push nested-name-specifier source location information into
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr.

Also, improve the computation that checks whether the base of a member
expression (either unresolved or dependent-scoped) is implicit. The
previous check didn't cover all of the cases we use in our
representation, which threw off source-location information for these
expressions (which, in turn, caused some breakage in libclang's token
annotation). 

llvm-svn: 126681
2011-02-28 20:01:57 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
e16af53619 Push nested-name-specifier source location information into
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, and clean up instantiation of
nested-name-specifiers with dependent template specialization types in
the process.

llvm-svn: 126663
2011-02-28 18:50:33 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
5a064725d6 Eliminate the last remains of TemplateSpecializationTypes with
dependent template names. There is still a lot of redundant code in
TreeTransform to cope with TemplateSpecializationTypes, which I'll
remove in stages.

llvm-svn: 126656
2011-02-28 17:23:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
6e068014f0 When we encounter a dependent template name within a
nested-name-specifier, e.g., 

  T::template apply<U>::

represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.

llvm-svn: 126593
2011-02-28 00:04:36 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
3a43fd645d Push nested-name-specifier source location information into
DependentScopeDeclRefExpr. Plus, give NestedNameSpecifierLoc == and !=
operators, since we're going to need 'em elsewhere.

llvm-svn: 126508
2011-02-25 20:49:16 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
a6ce608b97 Push nested-name-specifier source-location information into
pseudo-destructor expressions. Also, clean up some
template-instantiation and type-checking issues with
pseudo-destructors.

llvm-svn: 126498
2011-02-25 18:19:59 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
144548072d Use NestedNameSpecifierLoc within out-of-line variables, function, and
tag definitions. Also, add support for template instantiation of
NestedNameSpecifierLocs.

llvm-svn: 126470
2011-02-25 02:25:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
869ad45f8f Retain complete source-location information for C++
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.

Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.

llvm-svn: 126391
2011-02-24 17:54:50 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
7b26ff912f Teach NestedNameSpecifier to keep track of namespace aliases the same
way it keeps track of namespaces. Previously, we would map from the
namespace alias to its underlying namespace when building a
nested-name-specifier, losing source information in the process.

llvm-svn: 126358
2011-02-24 02:36:08 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
2ab3fee3f3 Tweak the CXXScopeSpec API a bit, so that we require the
nested-name-specifier and source range to be set at the same time.

llvm-svn: 126347
2011-02-24 00:49:34 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
90c9972fb2 Teach CXXScopeSpec to handle the extension of a nested-name-specifier
with another component in the nested-name-specifiers, updating its
representation (a NestedNameSpecifier) and source-location information
(currently a SourceRange) simultaneously. This is groundwork for
adding source-location information to nested-name-specifiers.

llvm-svn: 126346
2011-02-24 00:17:56 +00:00
Richard Smith
2abf6767e3 Fix PR9276: We were missing the checks for auto deducing to different types in the same declaration group in the template instantiation case.
llvm-svn: 126279
2011-02-23 00:37:57 +00:00
Richard Smith
30482bc786 Implement the C++0x deduced 'auto' feature.
This fixes PR 8738, 9060 and 9132.

llvm-svn: 126069
2011-02-20 03:19:35 +00:00
Chris Lattner
cab02a60d2 Step #2/N of __label__ support: keep pushing LabelDecl forward,
making them be template instantiated in a more normal way and 
make them handle attributes like other decls.

This fixes the used/unused label handling stuff, making it use
the same infrastructure as other decls.

llvm-svn: 125771
2011-02-17 20:34:02 +00:00
John McCall
c07a0c7e48 Change the representation of GNU ?: expressions to use a different expression
class and to bind the shared value using OpaqueValueExpr.  This fixes an
unnoticed problem with deserialization of these expressions where the
deserialized form would lose the vital pointer-equality trait;  or rather,
it fixes it because this patch also does the right thing for deserializing
OVEs.

Change OVEs to not be a "temporary object" in the sense that copy elision is
permitted.

This new representation is not totally unawkward to work with, but I think
that's really part and parcel with the semantics we're modelling here.  In
particular, it's much easier to fix things like the copy elision bug and to
make the CFG look right.

I've tried to update the analyzer to deal with this in at least some          
obvious cases, and I think we get a much better CFG out, but the printing
of OpaqueValueExprs probably needs some work.

llvm-svn: 125744
2011-02-17 10:25:35 +00:00
Chris Lattner
c8e630e4db Step #1/N of implementing support for __label__: split labels into
LabelDecl and LabelStmt.  There is a 1-1 correspondence between the
two, but this simplifies a bunch of code by itself.  This is because
labels are the only place where we previously had references to random
other statements, causing grief for AST serialization and other stuff.

This does cause one regression (attr(unused) doesn't silence unused
label warnings) which I'll address next.

This does fix some minor bugs:
1. "The only valid attribute " diagnostic was capitalized.
2. Various diagnostics printed as ''labelname'' instead of 'labelname'
3. This reduces duplication of label checking between functions and blocks.

Review appreciated, particularly for the cindex and template bits.

llvm-svn: 125733
2011-02-17 07:39:24 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
41f8546233 AST, Sema, Serialization: add CUDAKernelCallExpr and related semantic actions
llvm-svn: 125217
2011-02-09 21:07:24 +00:00
John McCall
bd06678921 Remove vtables from the Stmt hierarchy; this was pretty easy as
there were only three virtual methods of any significance.

The primary way to grab child iterators now is with
  Stmt::child_range children();
  Stmt::const_child_range children() const;
where a child_range is just a std::pair of iterators suitable for
being llvm::tie'd to some locals.  I've left the old child_begin()
and child_end() accessors in place, but it's probably a substantial
penalty to grab the iterators individually now, since the
switch-based dispatch is kindof inherently slower than vtable
dispatch.  Grabbing them together is probably a slight win over the
status quo, although of course we could've achieved that with vtables, too.

I also reclassified SwitchCase (correctly) as an abstract Stmt
class, which (as the first such class that wasn't an Expr subclass)
required some fiddling in a few places.

There are somewhat gross metaprogramming hooks in place to ensure
that new statements/expressions continue to implement
getSourceRange() and children().  I had to work around a recent clang
bug;  dgregor actually fixed it already, but I didn't want to
introduce a selfhosting dependency on ToT.

llvm-svn: 125183
2011-02-09 08:16:59 +00:00
John McCall
351762cda2 A few more tweaks to the blocks AST representation:
- BlockDeclRefExprs always store VarDecls
  - BDREs no longer store copy expressions
  - BlockDecls now store a list of captured variables, information about
    how they're captured, and a copy expression if necessary
    
With that in hand, change IR generation to use the captures data in       
blocks instead of walking the block independently.        

Additionally, optimize block layout by emitting fields in descending
alignment order, with a heuristic for filling in words when alignment
of the end of the block header is insufficient for the most aligned
field.

llvm-svn: 125005
2011-02-07 10:33:21 +00:00
John McCall
490112f7bf Assert during instantiation of blocks that we've captured everything that
we captured in the dependent case.

llvm-svn: 124887
2011-02-04 18:33:18 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
db9d664244 Rvalue references for *this:
- Add ref-qualifiers to the type system; they are part of the
  canonical type. Print & profile ref-qualifiers
  - Translate the ref-qualifier from the Declarator chunk for
    functions to the function type. 
  - Diagnose mis-uses of ref-qualifiers w.r.t. static member
  functions, free functions, constructors, destructors, etc.
  - Add serialization and deserialization of ref-qualifiers.

llvm-svn: 124281
2011-01-26 05:01:58 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
2d525f08c2 Teach TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc::initializeArgLocs() to actually
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.

[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.

llvm-svn: 124211
2011-01-25 19:13:18 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
a518d5b3ac Be a bit more defensive about setting the temporary base location
during template instantiation. This code needs to eventually die, but
this little tweak fixes PR8629, where bad location information slipped
through to the location of a class template instantiation.

llvm-svn: 124199
2011-01-25 17:51:48 +00:00
Nick Lewycky
0c4380856b Enhance the diagnostic for referring to a typedef with an elaborated name to be
as useful in a templated context as it is without templates. Fixes PR8755!

llvm-svn: 124136
2011-01-24 19:01:04 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
476e3029ec Implement basic support for the use of variadic templates and blocks
together. In particular: 
  - Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
  (BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
  - Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
  parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
  - Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
  explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).

Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.

llvm-svn: 123849
2011-01-19 21:32:01 +00:00
John McCall
33ddac05bb Change the canonical representation of array types to store qualifiers on the
outermost array types and not on the element type.  Move the CanonicalType
member from Type to ExtQualsTypeCommonBase;  the canonical type on an ExtQuals
node includes the qualifiers on the ExtQuals.  Assorted optimizations enabled
by this change.

getQualifiers(), hasQualifiers(), etc. should all now implicitly look through
array types.

llvm-svn: 123817
2011-01-19 10:06:00 +00:00
John McCall
424cec97bd Change QualType::getTypePtr() to return a const pointer, then change a
thousand other things which were (generally inadvertantly) relying on that.

llvm-svn: 123814
2011-01-19 06:33:43 +00:00
Jeffrey Yasskin
8dfa5f1776 Fix warnings found by gcc-4.6, from -Wunused-but-set-variable and
-Wint-to-pointer-cast.

llvm-svn: 123719
2011-01-18 02:00:16 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
5590be0491 Introduce a new kind of TemplateName that captures a substituted
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.

We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.

llvm-svn: 123521
2011-01-15 06:45:20 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
cdbc539aee Introduce a new expression kind, SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr,
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.

llvm-svn: 123506
2011-01-15 01:15:58 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
e1d60df0fc Teach template template argument pack expansions to keep track of the
number of expansions, when we know it, and propagate that information
through Sema.

llvm-svn: 123493
2011-01-14 23:41:42 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
715e461463 Handle substitutions into function parameter packs whose patterns
contain multiple parameter packs at different levels.

llvm-svn: 123488
2011-01-14 22:40:04 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
b884000ba9 Teach PackExpansionExpr to keep track of the number of pack expansions
it will expand to, if known. Propagate this information throughout Sema.

llvm-svn: 123470
2011-01-14 21:20:45 +00:00