Add ELFObjectFileBase::getLoongArchFeatures, and return the proper ELF
relative reloc type for LoongArch.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, SixWeining
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138016
GNU objdump disassembles all unknown instructions by default. Match this user
friendly behavior with the cpu value `future`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127824
This is a resurrection of D106421 with the change that it keeps backward-compatibility. This means decoding the previous version of `LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP` will work. This is required as the profile mapping tool is not released with LLVM (AutoFDO). As suggested by @jhenderson we rename the original section type value to `SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP_V0` and assign a new value to the `SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP` section type. The new encoding adds a version byte to each function entry to specify the encoding version for that function. This patch also adds a feature byte to be used with more flexibility in the future. An use-case example for the feature field is encoding multi-section functions more concisely using a different format.
Conceptually, the new encoding emits basic block offsets and sizes as label differences between each two consecutive basic block begin and end label. When decoding, offsets must be aggregated along with basic block sizes to calculate the final offsets of basic blocks relative to the function address.
This encoding uses smaller values compared to the existing one (offsets relative to function symbol).
Smaller values tend to occupy fewer bytes in ULEB128 encoding. As a result, we get about 17% total reduction in the size of the bb-address-map section (from about 11MB to 9MB for the clang PGO binary).
The extra two bytes (version and feature fields) incur a small 3% size overhead to the `LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP` section size.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121346
`--symbolize-operands` already symbolizes branch targets based on the disassembly. When the object file is created with `-fbasic-block-sections=labels` (ELF-only) it will include a SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP section which maps basic blocks to their addresses. In such case `llvm-objdump` can annotate the disassembly based on labels inferred on this section.
In contrast to the current labels, SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP-based labels are created for every machine basic block including empty blocks and those which are not branched into (fallthrough blocks).
The old logic is still executed even when the SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP section is present to handle functions which have not been received an entry in this section.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124560
This is the first patch of a series to upstream support for the new
subtarget.
Contributors:
Jay Foad <jay.foad@amd.com>
Konstantin Zhuravlyov <kzhuravl_dev@outlook.com>
Patch 1/N for upstreaming AMDGPU gfx11 architectures.
Reviewed By: foad, kzhuravl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124536
Most notably,
llvm/Object/Binary.h no longer includes llvm/Support/MemoryBuffer.h
llvm/Object/MachOUniversal*.h no longer include llvm/Object/Archive.h
llvm/Object/TapiUniversal.h no longer includes llvm/Object/TapiFile.h
llvm-project preprocessed size:
before: 1068185081
after: 1068324320
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119457
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
Apparently, the features were getting mixed up, so we'd try to
disassemble in ARM mode. Fix sub-architecture detection to compute the
correct triple if we're detecting it automatically, so the user doesn't
need to pass --triple=thumb etc.
It's possible we should be somehow tying the "+thumb-mode" target
feature more directly to Tag_CPU_arch_profile? But this seems to work
reasonably well, anyway.
While I'm here, fix up the other llvm-objdump tests that were explicitly
specifying an ARM triple; that shouldn't be necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106912
This is recommit for D90903 with fixes for BB:
1) Used std::move<> when returning Expected<> (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/112/builds/913)
2) Fixed the name of temporarily file in the file-headers.test (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/36/builds/1269)
(a local old temporarily file was used before)
For creating `ELFObjectFile` instances we have the factory method
`ELFObjectFile<ELFT>::create(MemoryBufferRef Object)`.
The problem of this method is that it scans the section header to locate some sections.
When a file is truncated or has broken fields in the ELF header, this approach does
not allow us to create the `ELFObjectFile` and dump the ELF header.
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40804
This patch suggests a solution - it allows to delay scaning sections in the
`ELFObjectFile<ELFT>::create`. It now allows user code to call an object
initialization (`initContent()`) later. With that it is possible,
for example, for dumpers just to dump the file header and exit.
By default initialization is still performed as before, what helps to keep
the logic of existent callers untouched.
I've experimented with different approaches when worked on this patch.
I think this approach is better than doing initialization of sections (i.e. scan of them)
on demand, because normally users of `ELFObjectFile` API expect to work with a valid object.
In most cases when a section header table can't be read (because of an error), we don't
have to continue to work with object. So we probably don't need to implement a more complex API.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90903
For creating `ELFObjectFile` instances we have the factory method
`ELFObjectFile<ELFT>::create(MemoryBufferRef Object)`.
The problem of this method is that it scans the section header to locate some sections.
When a file is truncated or has broken fields in the ELF header, this approach does
not allow us to create the `ELFObjectFile` and dump the ELF header.
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40804
This patch suggests a solution - it allows to delay scaning sections in the
`ELFObjectFile<ELFT>::create`. It now allows user code to call an object
initialization (`initContent()`) later. With that it is possible,
for example, for dumpers just to dump the file header and exit.
By default initialization is still performed as before, what helps to keep
the logic of existent callers untouched.
I've experimented with different approaches when worked on this patch.
I think this approach is better than doing initialization of sections (i.e. scan of them)
on demand, because normally users of `ELFObjectFile` API expect to work with a valid object.
In most cases when a section header table can't be read (because of an error), we don't
have to continue to work with object. So we probably don't need to implement a more complex API.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90903
This differentiates the Ryzen 4000/4300/4500/4700 series APUs that were
previously included in gfx909.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90419
Change-Id: Ia901a7157eb2f73ccd9f25dbacec38427312377d
At AMD, in an internal audit of our code, we found some corner cases
where we were not quite differentiating targets enough for some old
hardware. This commit is part of fixing that by adding three new
targets:
* The "Oland" and "Hainan" variants of gfx601 are now split out into
gfx602. LLPC (in the GPUOpen driver) and other front-ends could use
that to avoid using the shaderZExport workaround on gfx602.
* One variant of gfx703 is now split out into gfx705. LLPC and other
front-ends could use that to avoid using the
shaderSpiCsRegAllocFragmentation workaround on gfx705.
* The "TongaPro" variant of gfx802 is now split out into gfx805.
TongaPro has a faster 64-bit shift than its former friends in gfx802,
and a subtarget feature could be set up for that to take advantage of
it. This commit does not make that change; it just adds the target.
V2: Add clang changes. Put TargetParser list in order.
V3: AMDGCNGPUs table in TargetParser.cpp needs to be in GPUKind order,
so fix the GPUKind order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88916
Change-Id: Ia901a7157eb2f73ccd9f25dbacec38427312377d
AMDGPU ISA isn't backwards compatible and hence -mcpu must always be specified during disassembly.
However, the AMDGPU target CPU is stored in e_flags in the ELF object.
This patch allows targets to implement CPU string detection, and also implements it for AMDGPU by looking at e_flags.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84519
If the referenced symbol of a J[U]MP_SLOT is invalid (e.g. symbol index 0), llvm-objdump -d will bail out:
```
error: 'a': st_name (0x326600) is past the end of the string table of size 0x7
```
where 0x326600 is the st_name field of the first entry past the end of .symtab
Change it to a warning to continue dumping.
`X86/plt.test` uses a prebuilt executable, so I pick `ELF/AArch64/plt.test`
which has a YAML input and can be easily modified.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85623
Summary:
We don't consume the error from getBuildAttributes, so an assertions
build crashes with "Program aborted due to an unhandled Error:".
Explicitly consume it like the ARM version in that case.
Reviewers: asb, jhenderson, MaskRay, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, simoncook, kito-cheng, shiva0217, rogfer01, rkruppe, psnobl, benna, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, sameer.abuasal, luismarques, evandro, danielkiss, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77841
Leverage ARM ELF build attribute section to create ELF attribute section
for RISC-V. Extract the common part of parsing logic for this section
into ELFAttributeParser.[cpp|h] and ELFAttributes.[cpp|h].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74023
* Delete boilerplate
* Change functions to return `Error`
* Test parsing errors
* Update callers of ARMAttributeParser::parse() to check the `Error` return value.
Since this patch touches nearly everything in the file, I apply
http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VariableNames.html and change variable
names to lower case.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75015
r361845 changed the way we handle "D16" vs. "D32" targets; there used to
be a negative "d16" which removed instructions from the instruction set,
and now there's a "d32" feature which adds instructions to the
instruction set. This is good, but there was an oversight in the
implementation: the behavior of VFPv2 was changed. In particular, the
"vfp2" feature was changed to imply "d32". This is wrong: VFPv2 only
supports 16 D registers.
In practice, this means if you specify -mfpu=vfpv2, the compiler will
generate illegal instructions.
This patch gets rid of "vfp2d16" and "vfp2d16sp", and fixes "vfp2" and
"vfp2sp" so they don't imply "d32".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67375
llvm-svn: 372186
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Changes: no changes. A fix for the clang code will be landed right on top.
Original commit message:
SectionRef::getName() returns std::error_code now.
Returning Expected<> instead has multiple benefits.
For example, it forces user to check the error returned.
Also Expected<> may keep a valuable string error message,
what is more useful than having a error code.
(Object\invalid.test was updated to show the new messages printed.)
This patch makes a change for all users to switch to Expected<> version.
Note: in a few places the error returned was ignored before my changes.
In such places I left them ignored. My intention was to convert the interface
used, and not to improve and/or the existent users in this patch.
(Though I think this is good idea for a follow-ups to revisit such places
and either remove consumeError calls or comment each of them to clarify why
it is OK to have them).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66089
llvm-svn: 368826
