6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yingwei Zheng
380fa875ab
[InstCombine] Replace all dominated uses of condition with constants (#105510)
This patch replaces all dominated uses of condition with true/false to
improve context-sensitive optimizations. It eliminates a bunch of
branches in llvm-opt-benchmark.

As a side effect, it may introduce new phi nodes in some corner cases.
See the following case:
```
define i1 @test(i1 %cmp, i1 %cond) {
entry:
   br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
   br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else
if.then:
   br %bb2
if.else:
   br %bb2
bb2:
  %res = phi i1 [%cmp, %entry], [%cmp, %if.then], [%cmp, %if.else]
  ret i1 %res
}
```
It will be simplified into:
```
define i1 @test(i1 %cmp, i1 %cond) {
entry:
   br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
   br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else
if.then:
   br %bb2
if.else:
   br %bb2
bb2:
  %res = phi i1 [%cmp, %entry], [true, %if.then], [false, %if.else]
  ret i1 %res
}
```

I am planning to fix this in late pipeline/CGP since this problem exists
before the patch.
2024-09-01 09:49:23 +08:00
Bjorn Pettersson
acdc419c89 [test] Use -passes=instcombine instead of -instcombine in lots of tests. NFC
Another step moving away from the deprecated syntax of specifying
pass pipeline in opt.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119081
2022-02-07 14:26:59 +01:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
0fe32ac256 [InstCombine] treat i1 as a special type in shouldChangeType()
This patch is based on the llvm-dev discussion here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109631.html

Folding to i1 should always be desirable because that's better for value tracking 
and we have special folds for i1 types.

I checked for other users of shouldChangeType() where this might have an effect, 
but we already handle the i1 case differently than other types in all of those cases.

Side note: the default datalayout includes i1, so it seems we only find this gap in 
shouldChangeType + phi folding for the case when there is (1) an explicit datalayout 
without i1, (2) casting to i1 from a legal type, and (3) a phi with exactly 2 incoming
casted operands (as Björn mentioned).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29336

llvm-svn: 294066
2017-02-03 23:13:11 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
c0abce81c1 [InstCombine] add test for possible zext-phi transform; NFC
The datalayout doesn't include i1, so we don't do a potential shrink and sink transform.

Example based on discussion here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109631.html

llvm-svn: 293656
2017-01-31 17:43:00 +00:00