This does not change anything at the moment, but needed for
D89170. In that change I am probing a physical SGPR to see if
it is legal. RC is SReg_32, but DRC for scratch instructions
is SReg_32_XEXEC_HI and test fails.
That is sufficient just to check if DRC contains a register
here in case of physreg. Physregs also do not use subregs
so the subreg handling below is irrelevant for these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90064
I was wrong in thinking that MRI.use_instructions return unique instructions and mislead Jay in his previous patch D64393.
First loop counted more instructions than it was in reality and the second loop went beyond the basic block with that counter.
I used Jay's previous code that relied on MRI.use_operands to constrain the number of instructions to check among.
modifiesRegister is inlined to reduce the number of passes over instruction operands and added assert on BB end boundary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89386
If a target can encode multiple wait-states into a noop allow emitting such
instructions directly.
Reviewed By: rampitec, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89753
This would end up killing part of the result super-register, resulting
in a verifier error on a later use of the overlapping registers. We
could add kills of any non-aliasing registers, but we should be moving
away from relying on kill flags.
Generate the minimal set of s_mov instructions required when
expanding a SGPR copy operation in copyPhysReg.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89187
This can fix an asan failure like below.
==15856==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address ...
READ of size 8 at 0x6210001a3cb0 thread T0
#0 llvm::MachineInstr::getParent()
#1 llvm::LiveVariables::VarInfo::findKill()
#2 TwoAddressInstructionPass::rescheduleMIBelowKill()
#3 TwoAddressInstructionPass::tryInstructionTransform()
#4 TwoAddressInstructionPass::runOnMachineFunction()
We need to update the Kills if we replace instructions. The Kills
may be later accessed within TwoAddressInstruction pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89092
Extend loadSRsrcFromVGPR to allow moving a range of instructions into
the loop. The call instruction is surrounded by copies into physical
registers which should be part of the waterfall loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88291
Fix the verifier so that overlapping SGPR operands are counted
independently. We cannot assume that overlapping SGPR accesses
only count as a single constant bus use.
The exception is implicit uses which do not add to constant bus
usage (only) when overlapping.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87748
Since 6524a7a2b9ca072bd7f7b4355d1230e70c679d2f, this would sometimes
not emit the or to exec at the beginning of the block, where it really
has to be. If there is an instruction that defines one of the source
operands, split the block and turn the si_end_cf into a terminator.
This avoids regressions when regalloc fast is switched to inserting
reloads at the beginning of the block, instead of spills at the end of
the block.
In a future change, this should always split the block.
Pre-gfx10 all MODE-setting instructions were S_SETREG_B32 which is
marked as having unmodeled side effects, which makes the machine
scheduler treat it as a barrier. Now that we have proper implicit $mode
operands we can use a no-side-effects S_SETREG_B32_mode pseudo instead
for setregs that only touch the FP MODE bits, to give the scheduler more
freedom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87446
- When an operand is changed into an immediate value or like, ensure their
target flags being cleared or set properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87109
There is no justification for changing vcc_lo to vcc
when shrinking V_CNDMASK, and such a change could
later confuse live variable analysis.
Make sure the original register is preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86541
Summary:
When the resource descriptor is of vgpr, we need a waterfall loop
to read into a sgpr. In this patchm we generalized the implementation
to work for any regster class sizes, and extend the work to MIMG
instructions.
Fixes: SWDEV-223405
Reviewers:
arsenm, nhaehnle
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82603
The previous implementation was incorrect, and based off incorrect
instruction definitions. Unfortunately we can't match natural
addressing in a lot of cases due to the shift/scale applied in
getelementptrs. This relies on reducing the 64-bit shift to 32-bits.
Fix 64-bit copy to SCC by restricting the pattern resulting
in such a copy to subtargets supporting 64-bit scalar compare,
and mapping the copy to S_CMP_LG_U64.
Before introducing the S_CSELECT pattern with explicit SCC
(0045786f146e78afee49eee053dc29ebc842fee1), there was no need
for handling 64-bit copy to SCC ($scc = COPY sreg_64).
The proposed handling to read only the low bits was however
based on a false premise that it is only one bit that matters,
while in fact the copy source might be a vector of booleans and
all bits need to be considered.
The practical problem of mapping the 64-bit copy to SCC is that
the natural instruction to use (S_CMP_LG_U64) is not available
on old hardware. Fix it by restricting the problematic pattern
to subtargets supporting the instruction (hasScalarCompareEq64).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85207
Avoid recursively calling copyPhysReg for AGPR handling. This was
dropping the necessary super register implicit defs to avoid liveness
verifier errors.
Get rid of all fixmes and base heuristic on `num-clustered-dwords`. The main intuition behind this is as
follows. The existing heuristic roughly summarizes as below:
* Assume, all the mem ops instructions participating in the clustering process, loads/stores same num bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 4 bytes, then cluster at max 5 mem ops, that is at max 20 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 8 bytes, then cluster at max 3 mem ops, that is at max 24 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 16 bytes, then cluster at max 2 mem ops, that is at max 32 bytes
So, we need to make sure that the new heuristic do not completey deviate away from the above one, and it
properly handles both the sub-word loads and the wide loads.
Reviewed By: arsenm, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84354
Currently GlobalISel doesn't force all VGPR phi operands to VGPRs, so
this hit a case where it was queried with a VGPR and SGPR. This could
arguably be a verifier error, but it's currently not.
This is in preparation for fixing multiple problems with the way AGPR
copies are handled, but this change is NFC itself. First, it's relying
on recursively calling copyPhysReg, which is losing information
necessary to get correct super register handling.
Second, it's constructing a new RegScavenger and doing a O(N^2) walk
on every single sub-spill for every AGPR tuple copy. Third, it's using
the forward form of the scavenger, and not using the preferred
backwards scan.
The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
If the original register operand had a subregister, it wasn't getting
cleared. This resulted in reinterpreted the subreg index as
unrecognized target flags, which produced unparseable MIR.
Before this instruction supported output values, it fit fairly
naturally as a terminator. However, being a terminator while also
supporting outputs causes some trouble, as the physreg->vreg COPY
operations cannot be in the same block.
Modeling it as a non-terminator allows it to be handled the same way
as invoke is handled already.
Most of the changes here were created by auditing all the existing
users of MachineBasicBlock::isEHPad() and
MachineBasicBlock::hasEHPadSuccessor(), and adding calls to
isInlineAsmBrIndirectTarget or mayHaveInlineAsmBr, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79794
Condition `LiteralCount` is checked both in an outer and in an inner
`if` statement in `SIInstrInfo::verifyInstruction()`. This patch removes
the redundant inner check.
The issue was found using `clang-tidy` check under review
`misc-redundant-condition`. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D81272.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82555
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Re-commit D81925 with a bugfix D82370.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82370
Summary:
Without fixImplicitOperands we may end up creating default implicit operands
that are the wrong wave size
Includes simple test that provokes insertBranch in the correct way to expose the
issue being fixed.
Change-Id: I92bdcdee9fcb7b4d91529b84e76a48ac8218483e
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82459
Summary:
Make use of both the - (1) clustered bytes and (2) cluster length, to decide on
the max number of mem ops that can be clustered. On an average, when loads
are dword or smaller, consider `5` as max threshold, otherwise `4`. This
heuristic is purely based on different experimentation conducted, and there is
no analytical logic here.
Reviewers: foad, rampitec, arsenm, vpykhtin
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kerbowa, hiraditya, t-tye, Anastasia, tpr, dstuttard, yaxunl, nhaehnle, wdng, jvesely, kzhuravl, thakis
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82393
Always prefer to clobber input SGPRs and restore them after the
spill. This applies to both spills to VGPRs and scratch.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81914
