456 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maksim Levental
21774489f0
[mlir][python] fix PyDenseResourceElementsAttribute finalizer (#150561)
This PR melds https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150137 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149414 *and* partially reverts
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124832.

The summary is the `PyDenseResourceElementsAttribute` finalizer/deleter
has/had two problems

1. wasn't threadsafe (can be called from a different thread than that
which currently holds the GIL)
2. can be called while the interpreter is "not initialized"

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124832 for some reason decides
to re-initialize the interpreter to avoid case 2 and runs afoul of the
fact that `Py_IsInitialized` can be false during the finalization of the
interpreter itself (e.g., at the end of a script).

I don't know why this decision was made (I missed the PR) but I believe
we should never be calling
[Py_Initialize](https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/init.html#c.Py_Initialize):

> In an application \*\*\*\***embedding Python**\*\*\*\*, this should be
called before using any other Python/C API functions

**but we aren't embedding Python**!

So therefore we will only be in case 2 when the interpreter is being
finalized and in that case we should just leak the buffer.

Note,
[lldb](548ca9e976/lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp (L81-L93))
does a similar sort of thing for its finalizers.

Co-authored-by: Anton Korobeynikov <anton@korobeynikov.info>
Co-authored-by: Max Manainen <maximmanainen@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Anton Korobeynikov <anton@korobeynikov.info>
Co-authored-by: Max Manainen <maximmanainen@gmail.com>
2025-07-25 08:05:30 -04:00
Maksim Levental
a36508483e
[mlir][python,CAPI] expose Op::isBeforeInBlock (#150271) 2025-07-23 12:33:42 -05:00
Akshay Khadse
e4a3541ff8
[MLIR][Python] Support eliding large resource strings in PassManager (#149187)
- Introduces a `large_resource_limit` parameter across Python bindings,
enabling the eliding of resource strings exceeding a specified character
limit during IR printing.
- To maintain backward compatibilty, when using `operation.print()` API,
if `large_resource_limit` is None and the `large_elements_limit` is set,
the later will be used to elide the resource string as well. This change
was introduced by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125738.
- For printing using pass manager, the `large_resource_limit` and
`large_elements_limit` are completely independent of each other.
2025-07-17 12:57:04 -04:00
Martin Erhart
616e4c43dd
[mlir] Add Python bindings to enable default passmanager timing (#149087) 2025-07-16 15:45:15 +01:00
Jakub Kuderski
6512ca7ddb
[mlir] Add isStatic* size check for ShapedTypes. NFCI. (#147085)
The motivation is to avoid having to negate `isDynamic*` checks, avoid
double negations, and allow for `ShapedType::isStaticDim` to be used in
ADT functions without having to wrap it in a lambda performing the
negation.

Also add the new functions to C and Python bindings.
2025-07-07 14:57:27 -04:00
Nikita Popov
c3c3919dc2 Revert "[DenseMap] Do not align pointer sentinel values (NFC) (#146595)"
This reverts commit 7a6435bec59010e4bb2e1e52a9ba840ed152b4ce.

This causes ubsan failures when the sentinel pointers are upcast
using static_cast<>, which checks alignment.
2025-07-07 15:15:47 +02:00
Nikita Popov
7a6435bec5
[DenseMap] Do not align pointer sentinel values (NFC) (#146595)
DenseMapInfo for pointers currently uses empty/tombstone values that are
aligned (by assuming a very conservative alignment). However, this means
that we have to work with larger immediates.

This patch proposes to use the values -1 and -2 instead, without caring
about pointer alignment. (Non-roundtrip) integer to pointer casts are
implementation-defined in C++, but the general implementer consensus
(including Clang) is that raw pointers do not carry alignment
requirements, only memory accesses do.

We already have lots of places that rely on this using variations on
`reinterpret_cast<T*>(-1)`, so it seems odd to insist on properly
aligned pointers in this one place.

It is necessary to adjust a few other places after this change, which
currently assume that `DenseMapInfo<void *>` returns a highly-aligned
pointer.

This is a small improvement for both compile-time and clang binary size.
2025-07-07 12:47:41 +02:00
Longsheng Mou
5a8e60e724
[mlir] Use llvm::fill instead of std::fill(NFC) (#146889) 2025-07-07 09:12:38 +08:00
Maksim Levental
a2aa812a31
[mlir][python] bind block predecessors and successors (#145116)
bind `block.getSuccessor` and `block.getPredecessors`.
2025-06-23 19:59:03 -04:00
Maksim Levental
227f759644
[mlir][python] expose operation.block (#145088)
Expose `operation-getBlock()` in python.
2025-06-20 15:34:43 -04:00
Bangtian Liu
7119b0cfd3
[MLIR][CAPI][python] expose the python binding for linalgOp.getIndexingMaps (#136054)
This PR is mainly about exposing the python bindings for
`linalgOp.getIndexingMaps`.

---------

Signed-off-by: Bangtian Liu <liubangtian@gmail.com>
2025-04-17 16:52:36 -04:00
Maksim Levental
697aa9995c
[mlir][SMT] add python bindings (#135674)
This PR adds "rich" python bindings to SMT dialect.
2025-04-16 18:17:09 -04:00
Bangtian Liu
9466cbdf29
[mlir][CAPI][python] expose the python bindings for linalg::isaConvolutionOpInterface and linalg::inferConvolutionDims (#135253)
This PR is mainly about exposing the python bindings for
`linalg::isaConvolutionOpInterface` and `linalg::inferConvolutionDims`.

---------

Signed-off-by: Bangtian Liu <liubangtian@gmail.com>
2025-04-10 20:22:15 -04:00
Bangtian Liu
c359f7625f
[mlir][CAPI][python] expose the python bindings for linalg::isaContractionOpInterface and linalg::inferContractionDims (#134935)
This PR is mainly about exposing the python bindings for`
linalg::isaContractionOpInterface` and` linalg::inferContractionDims`.

---------

Signed-off-by: Bangtian Liu <liubangtian@gmail.com>
2025-04-09 20:01:38 -04:00
Maksim Levental
9b50167ed9
[mlir][python] add use_name_loc_as_prefix to value.get_name() (#135052)
Add `use_name_loc_as_prefix` to `value.get_name()`.
2025-04-09 19:28:59 -04:00
Ivan Butygin
1f194ff34e
[mlir] Expose simplifyAffineExpr through python api (#133926) 2025-04-01 19:28:53 +03:00
Sandeep Dasgupta
81d7eef134
Sub-channel quantized type implementation (#120172)
This is an implementation for [RFC: Supporting Sub-Channel Quantization
in
MLIR](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-supporting-sub-channel-quantization-in-mlir/82694).

In order to make the review process easier, the PR has been divided into
the following commit labels:

1. **Add implementation for sub-channel type:** Includes the class
design for `UniformQuantizedSubChannelType`, printer/parser and bytecode
read/write support. The existing types (per-tensor and per-axis) are
unaltered.
2. **Add implementation for sub-channel type:** Lowering of
`quant.qcast` and `quant.dcast` operations to Linalg operations.
3. **Adding C/Python Apis:** We first define he C-APIs and build the
Python-APIs on top of those.
4. **Add pass to normalize generic ....:** This pass normalizes
sub-channel quantized types to per-tensor per-axis types, if possible.


A  design note:
- **Explicitly storing the `quantized_dimensions`, even when they can be
derived for ranked tensor.**
While it's possible to infer quantized dimensions from the static shape
of the scales (or zero-points) tensor for ranked
data tensors
([ref](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-supporting-sub-channel-quantization-in-mlir/82694/3)
for background), there are cases where this can lead to ambiguity and
issues with round-tripping.

```
Consider the example: tensor<2x4x!quant.uniform<i8:f32:{0:2, 0:2}, {{s00:z00, s01:z01}}>>
```

The shape of the scales tensor is [1, 2], which might suggest that only
axis 1 is quantized. While this inference is technically correct, as the
block size for axis 0 is a degenerate case (equal to the dimension
size), it can cause problems with round-tripping. Therefore, even for
ranked tensors, we are explicitly storing the quantized dimensions.
Suggestions welcome!


PS: I understand that the upcoming holidays may impact your schedule, so
please take your time with the review. There's no rush.
2025-03-23 07:37:55 -05:00
Sergei Lebedev
c8a9a4109a
[MLIR] [python] A few improvements to the Python bindings (#131686)
* `PyRegionList` is now sliceable. The dialect bindings generator seems
to assume it is sliceable already (!), yet accessing e.g. `cases` on
`scf.IndexedSwitchOp` raises a `TypeError` at runtime.
* `PyBlockList` and `PyOperationList` support negative indexing. It is
common for containers to do that in Python, and most container in the
MLIR Python bindings already allow the index to be negative.
2025-03-21 00:13:13 -04:00
Ivan Butygin
7c98cddc5a
[mlir] Expose AffineExpr.shift_dims/shift_symbols through C and Python bindings (#131521) 2025-03-16 19:57:56 +03:00
vfdev
ab18cc246c
[MLIR][py] Add PyThreadPool as wrapper around MlirLlvmThreadPool in MLIR python bindings (#130109)
In some projects like JAX ir.Context are used with disabled multi-threading to avoid
caching multiple threading pools:

623865fe95/jax/_src/interpreters/mlir.py (L606-L611)

However, when context has enabled multithreading it also uses locks on
the StorageUniquers and this can be helpful to avoid data races in the
multi-threaded execution (for example with free-threaded cpython,
https://github.com/jax-ml/jax/issues/26272).
With this PR user can enable the multi-threading: 1) enables additional
locking and 2) set a shared threading pool such that cached contexts can
have one global pool.
2025-03-10 11:19:23 +01:00
Maksim Levental
0264d42dc7
[mlir][CAPI][python] bind CallSiteLoc, FileLineColRange, FusedLoc, NameLoc (#129351)
This PR extends the python bindings for CallSiteLoc, FileLineColRange,
FusedLoc, NameLoc with field accessors. It also adds the missing
`value.location` accessor.

I also did some "spring cleaning" here (`cast` -> `dyn_cast`) after
running into some of my own illegal casts.
2025-03-10 05:10:34 -04:00
Jacques Pienaar
540d7ddb15
[mlir][py] Plumb OpPrintingFlags::printNameLocAsPrefix() through the C/Python APIs (#129607) 2025-03-04 11:49:34 -08:00
Nikhil Kalra
a60e8a2c25
[mlir] Python: write bytecode to a file path (#127118)
The current `write_bytecode` implementation necessarily requires the
serialized module to be duplicated in memory when the python `bytes`
object is created and sent over the binding. For modules with large
resources, we may want to avoid this in-memory copy by serializing
directly to a file instead of sending bytes across the boundary.
2025-02-24 17:51:49 -08:00
Nikhil Kalra
65ed4fa57e
[mlir] Python: Parse ModuleOp from file path (#126572)
For extremely large models, it may be inefficient to load the model into
memory in Python prior to passing it to the MLIR C APIs for
deserialization. This change adds an API to parse a ModuleOp directly
from a file path.

Re-lands
[4e14b8a](4e14b8afb4).
2025-02-12 14:02:41 -08:00
Mehdi Amini
67b7a2590f
Revert "[mlir] Python: Parse ModuleOp from file path" (#126482)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#125736

The gcc7 Bot is broken at the moment.
2025-02-10 09:09:58 +01:00
Nikhil Kalra
4e14b8afb4
[mlir] Python: Parse ModuleOp from file path (#125736)
For extremely large models, it may be inefficient to load the model into
memory in Python prior to passing it to the MLIR C APIs for
deserialization. This change adds an API to parse a ModuleOp directly
from a file path.
2025-02-05 11:48:37 -08:00
Nikhil Kalra
0ad1f8369c
[mlir] Python: Extend print large elements limit to resources (#125738)
If the large element limit is specified, large elements are hidden from
the asm but large resources are not. This change extends the large
elements limit to apply to printed resources as well.
2025-02-05 11:48:11 -08:00
Matthias Gehre
5d3ae51612
Reapply "[mlir][python] allow DenseIntElementsAttr for index type (#118947)" (#124804)
This reapplies #118947 and adapts to nanobind.
2025-01-29 09:14:37 +01:00
Fabian Tschopp
28507ac629
[MLIR] Fix thread safety of the deleter in PyDenseResourceElementsAttribute (#124832)
In general, `PyDenseResourceElementsAttribute` can get deleted at any
time and any thread, where unlike the `getFromBuffer` call, the Python
interpreter may not be initialized and the GIL may not be held.

This PR fixes segfaults caused by `PyBuffer_Release` when the GIL is not
being held by the thread calling the deleter.
2025-01-28 18:56:00 -05:00
Matthias Gehre
1b729c3d70 Revert "[mlir][python] allow DenseIntElementsAttr for index type (#118947)"
This reverts commit 9dd762e8b10586e749b0ddf3542e5dccf8392395.
2025-01-28 18:35:50 +01:00
Matthias Gehre
9dd762e8b1
[mlir][python] allow DenseIntElementsAttr for index type (#118947)
Model the `IndexType` as `uint64_t` when converting to a python integer. 

With the python bindings, 
```python
DenseIntElementsAttr(op.attributes["attr"])
```
used to `assert` when `attr` had `index` type like `dense<[1, 2, 3, 4]>
: vector<4xindex>`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Christopher McGirr <christopher.mcgirr@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Tiago Trevisan Jost <tiago.trevisanjost@amd.com>
2025-01-28 18:31:58 +01:00
Peter Hawkins
acde3f722f
[mlir:python] Compute get_op_result_or_value in PyOpView's constructor. (#123953)
This logic is in the critical path for constructing an operation from
Python. It is faster to compute this in C++ than it is in Python, and it
is a minor change to do this.

This change also alters the API contract of
_ods_common.get_op_results_or_values to avoid calling
get_op_result_or_value on each element of a sequence, since the C++ code
will now do this.

Most of the diff here is simply reordering the code in IRCore.cpp.
2025-01-24 06:26:28 -08:00
Jacques Pienaar
a77250fd78
[mlir] Add C and Python interface for file range (#123276)
Plumbs through creating file ranges to C and Python.
2025-01-22 14:33:19 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
e30b703060
[mlir:python] Construct PyOperation objects in-place on the Python heap. (#123813)
Currently we make two memory allocations for each PyOperation: a Python
object, and the PyOperation class itself. With some care we can allocate
the PyOperation inline inside the Python object, saving us a malloc()
call per object and perhaps improving cache locality.
2025-01-22 06:26:44 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
f4125e0226
[mlir python] Change PyOpView constructor to construct operations. (#123777)
Previously ODS-generated Python operations had code like this:
```
  super().__init__(self.build_generic(attributes=attributes, operands=operands, successors=_ods_successors, regions=regions, loc=loc, ip=ip))
```

we change it to:
```
  super().__init__(self.OPERATION_NAME, self._ODS_REGIONS, self._ODS_OPERAND_SEGMENTS, self._ODS_RESULT_SEGMENTS, attributes=attributes, operands=operands, successors=_ods_successors, regions=regions, loc=loc, ip=ip)
```

This:
a) avoids an extra call dispatch (to `build_generic`), and
b) passes the class attributes directly to the constructor. Benchmarks
show that it is faster to pass these as arguments rather than having the
C++ code look up attributes on the class.

This PR improves the timing of the following benchmark on my workstation
from 5.3s to 4.5s:
```
def main(_):
  with ir.Context(), ir.Location.unknown():
    typ = ir.IntegerType.get_signless(32)
    m = ir.Module.create()
    with ir.InsertionPoint(m.body):
      start = time.time()
      for i in range(1000000):
        arith.ConstantOp(typ, i)
      end = time.time()
      print(f"time: {end - start}")
```

Since this change adds an additional overload to the constructor and
does not alter any existing behaviors, it should be backwards
compatible.
2025-01-22 06:21:46 -08:00
Han-Chung Wang
9cbc1f29ca
[mlir][NFC] Avoid using braced initializer lists to call a constructor. (#123714)
In the LLVM style guide, we prefer not using braced initializer lists to
call a constructor. Also, we prefer using an equal before the open curly
brace if we use a braced initializer list when initializing a variable.

See

https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#do-not-use-braced-initializer-lists-to-call-a-constructor
for more details.

The style guide does not explain the reason well. There is an article
from abseil, which mentions few benefits. E.g., we can avoid the most
vexing parse, etc. See https://abseil.io/tips/88 for more details.

Signed-off-by: hanhanW <hanhan0912@gmail.com>
2025-01-21 21:23:32 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
e2c49a45da
[mlir python] Add locking around PyMlirContext::liveOperations. (#122720)
In JAX, I observed a race between two PyOperation destructors from
different threads updating the same `liveOperations` map, despite not
intentionally sharing the context between different threads. Since I
don't think we can be completely sure when GC happens and on which
thread, it seems safest simply to add locking here.

We may also want to explicitly support sharing a context between threads
in the future, which would require this change or something similar.
2025-01-13 17:49:25 +02:00
vfdev
f136c800b6
Enabled freethreading support in MLIR python bindings (#122684)
Reland reverted https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107103 with
the fixes for Python 3.8

cc @jpienaar

Co-authored-by: Peter Hawkins <phawkins@google.com>
2025-01-13 03:00:31 -08:00
Jacques Pienaar
3f1486f08e Revert "Added free-threading CPython mode support in MLIR Python bindings (#107103)"
Breaks on 3.8, rolling back to avoid breakage while fixing.

This reverts commit 9dee7c44491635ec9037b90050bcdbd3d5291e38.
2025-01-12 18:30:42 +00:00
vfdev
9dee7c4449
Added free-threading CPython mode support in MLIR Python bindings (#107103)
Related to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/105522

Description:

This PR is a joint work with Peter Hawkins (@hawkinsp) originally done
by myself for pybind11 and then reworked to nanobind based on Peter's
branch: https://github.com/hawkinsp/llvm-project/tree/nbdev .

- Added free-threading CPython mode support for MLIR Python bindings
- Added a test which can reveal data races when cpython and LLVM/MLIR
compiled with TSAN

Context:
- Related to https://github.com/google/jax/issues/23073

Co-authored-by: Peter Hawkins <phawkins@google.com>
2025-01-12 09:56:49 -08:00
vfdev
a0f5bbcfb7
Fixed typo in dunder get/set methods in PyAttrBuilderMap (#121794)
Description:
- fixed a typo in the method name: dunde -> dunder
2025-01-07 10:33:01 -05:00
Maksim Levental
08e2c15a28
[mlir][python] disable nanobind leak warnings (#121099) 2024-12-29 12:13:10 -05:00
Peter Hawkins
5cd4274772
[mlir python] Port in-tree dialects to nanobind. (#119924)
This is a companion to #118583, although it can be landed independently
because since #117922 dialects do not have to use the same Python
binding framework as the Python core code.

This PR ports all of the in-tree dialect and pass extensions to
nanobind, with the exception of those that remain for testing pybind11
support.

This PR also:
* removes CollectDiagnosticsToStringScope from NanobindAdaptors.h. This
was overlooked in a previous PR and it is duplicated in Diagnostics.h.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jacques Pienaar <jpienaar@google.com>
2024-12-20 20:32:32 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
b56d1ec6cb
[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#120473)
Relands #118583, with a fix for Python 3.8 compatibility. It was not
possible to set the buffer protocol accessers via slots in Python 3.8.

Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.

For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.

To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::` to `nanobind::`.

Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
2024-12-18 18:55:42 -08:00
Jacques Pienaar
6e8b3a3e0c Revert "[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#118583)"
This reverts commit 41bd35b58bb482fd466aa4b13aa44a810ad6470f.

Breakage detected, rolling back.
2024-12-18 19:31:32 +00:00
Peter Hawkins
41bd35b58b
[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#118583)
Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.

For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.

To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::`
to `nanobind::`.

Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
2024-12-18 11:16:11 -08:00
Maksim Levental
392622d084
Revert "Revert "[mlir python] Add nanobind support (#119232)
Reverts revert #118517 after (hopefully) fixing builders
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/328,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/327)

This reverts commit 61bf308cf2fc32452f14861c102ace89f5f36fec.
2024-12-09 16:37:43 -05:00
Yuanqiang Liu
2e51e150e1
[MLIR][Python] enhance python ir printing with pringing flags (#117836)
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65854
2024-12-05 10:31:04 +01:00
Maksim Levental
61bf308cf2
Revert "[mlir python] Add nanobind support for standalone dialects." (#118517)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#117922 because deps aren't met on some of the
post-commit build bots.
2024-12-03 09:26:33 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
afe75b4d5f
[mlir python] Add nanobind support for standalone dialects. (#117922)
This PR allows out-of-tree dialects to write Python dialect modules
using nanobind instead of pybind11.

It may make sense to migrate in-tree dialects and some of the ODS Python
infrastructure to nanobind, but that is a topic for a future change.

This PR makes the following changes:
* adds nanobind to the CMake and Bazel build systems. We also add
robin_map to the Bazel build, which is a dependency of nanobind.
* adds a PYTHON_BINDING_LIBRARY option to various CMake functions, such
as declare_mlir_python_extension, allowing users to select a Python
binding library.
* creates a fork of mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/PybindAdaptors.h
named NanobindAdaptors.h. This plays the same role, using nanobind
instead of pybind11.
* splits CollectDiagnosticsToStringScope out of PybindAdaptors.h and
into a new header mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/Diagnostics.h, since
it is code that is no way related to pybind11 or for that matter,
Python.
* changed the standalone Python extension example to have both pybind11
and nanobind variants.
* changed mlir/python/mlir/dialects/python_test.py to have both pybind11
and nanobind variants.

Notes:
* A slightly unfortunate thing that I needed to do in the CMake
integration was to use FindPython in addition to FindPython3, since
nanobind's CMake integration expects the Python_ names for variables.
Perhaps there's a better way to do this.
2024-12-03 09:13:34 -08:00