Using `Sequence` frees users from the need to cast to `list` in cases
where the underlying API does not really care about the type of the
container.
Note that accepting an `nb::sequence` is marginally slower than
accepting `nb::list` directly, because `__getitem__`, `__len__` etc need
to go through an extra layer of indirection. However, I expect the
performance difference to be negligible.
This PR fixed
[issues](https://github.com/iree-org/iree/actions/runs/21956878131/job/63423389868#step:7:211)
caused by dropping `LLVMSupport` in PR #180986, dropped the remaining
direct llvm dependencies from mlir-python binding files.
Previously `LLVMSupport` was dropped while some uncleaned `mlir/CAPI/*`
sources were still being pulled into mlir-py, and those files still
directly depended on LLVM headers. The issue was masked via a global
`include_directories(${LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS})` in `mlir/CMakeLists.txt`,
out-of-tree builds (e.g., IREE) that define Python module targets
outside the mlir/ directory tree would fail with "no such llvm file"
errors.
Provides the infrastructure for implementing and late-binding
OpInterfaces from Python.
* On the mlir-c API declaration side, each `XOpInterface` has a callback
struct, with a callback for each method and a userdata member (provided
as an arg to each method), and a
`mlirXOpInterfaceAttachFallbackModel(ctx, op_name, callbacks)` func.
* This CAPI is implemented by defining a subclass of
`XOpInterface::FallbackModel` that holds the callback struct and has
each method call the corresponding callback (with userdata as an arg).
Given a callback struct, a new `FallbackModel` is created and attached,
i.e. late bound, to the named op. (MLIR's interface infrastructure is
such that the thus registered `FallbackModel` will be returned in case
the op gets cast to the `XOpInterface`.)
* On the Python side, we expose a stand-in `XOpInterface` base class
which has one (class)method: `XOpInterface.attach(cls, op_name, ctx)`.
Python users subclass this class (`class MyInterfaceImpl(XOpInterface):
...`) and implement the interface's methods (with the right names and
signatures). The user calls `attach` on the subclass
(`MyInterfaceImpl.attach("my_dialect.my_op", ctx)`) which prepares the
callbacks struct _with userdata set to the subclass_ (as we use it to
lookup methods). These callbacks (and userdata) are then registered as
an `XOpInterface::FallbackModel` by
`mlirXOpInterfaceAttachFallbackModel(...)`. From then on the Python
methods will be used to respond to calls to the interface methods
(originating in C++).
This PR enables implementing the TransformOpInterface and the
MemoryEffectsOpInterface, both of which are required for making an op
into a transform op.
Everything besides the above linked code is there to facilitate exposing
the interfaces: the right types for the arguments of the methods are
exposed as are functions/methods for manipulating these arguments (e.g.
specifying side effects on `OpOperand`s and `OpResult`s and being able
to access and set the transform handles associated with args and
results).
# What
This PR adds a shared library `MLIRPythonSupport` which contains all of
the CRTP classes ike `PyConcreteValue`, `PyConcreteType`,
`PyConcreteAttribute`, as well as other useful code like `Defaulting*`
and etc enabling their reuse in downstream projects. Downstream projects
can now do
```c++
struct PyTestType : mlir::python::MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_DOMAIN::PyConcreteType<PyTestType> {
...
};
class PyTestAttr : public mlir::python::MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_DOMAIN::PyConcreteAttribute<PyTestAttr> {
...
}
NB_MODULE(_mlirPythonTestNanobind, m) {
PyTestType::bind(m);
PyTestAttr::bind(m);
}
```
instead of using the discordant alternative
`mlir_type_subclass`/`mlir_attr_subclass` (same goes for
`PyConcreteValue`/`mlir_value_subclass`).
# Why
This PR is mostly code motion (along with CMake) but before I describe
the changes I want to state the goals/benefits:
1. Currently upstream "core" extensions and "dialect" extensions ([all
of the `Dialect*` extensions
here](d7c734b5a1/mlir/lib/Bindings/Python))
are a two-tier system;
**a**. [core
extensions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/mlir/lib/Bindings/Python/IRTypes.cpp#L361)
enjoy first class support as far as type inference[^3], type stub
generation, and ease of implementation, while dialect extensions [have
poorer support](https://reviews.llvm.org/D150927), incorrect type stub
generation much more tedious (boilerplate) implementation;
**b**. Crucially, this two-tiered system is reflected in the fact that
**the two sets of types/attributes are not in the same Python object
hierarchy**. To wit: `isinstance(..., Type)` and `isinstance(...,
Attribute)` are not supported for the dialect extensions[^2];
**c**. Since these types are not exposed in public headers, downstream
users (dialect extensions or not) cannot write functions that overload
on e.g. `PyFloat8*Type` - that's quite a [useful
feature](fdbee98df8/cpp_ext/TorchOps.cpp (L29-L69))!
2. The dialect extensions incur a sizeable performance penalty relative
to the core extensions in that every single trip across the wire (either
`python->cpp` or `cpp->python`) requires work in addition to nanobind's
own casting/construction pipeline;
**a**. When going from `python->cpp`, [we extract the capsule object
from the Python
object](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/NanobindAdaptors.h#L219C24-L219C46)
and then extract from the capsule the `Mlir*` opaque struct/ptr. This
side isn't so onerous;
**b**. When going from `cpp->python` we call long-hand call Python
`import` APIs and construct the Python object using `_CAPICreate`. Note,
there at least 2 `attr` calls incurred in addition to `_CAPICreate`;
this is already much more [efficiently handled by nanobind
itself](4ba51fcf79/src/nb_internals.h (L381-L382))!
3. This division blocks various features: in some configurations[^1] we
trigger a circular import bug because "dialect" types and attributes
perform an [import of the root `_mlir`
module](bd9651bf78/mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/NanobindAdaptors.h (L585))
when they are created (the types themselves, not even instances of those
types). This blocks type stub generation for dialect extensions (i.e.,
the reason we currently only generate type stubs for `_mlir`).
# How
Prior this was not done/possible because of "ODR" issues but I have
resolved those issues; the basic idea for how we solve this is "move
things we want to share into shared libraries":
1. Move IRCore (stuff like `PyConcreteValue`, `PyConcreteType`,
`PyConcreteAttribute`) into `MLIRPythonSupport`;
- Note, we move the rest of the things in `IRModule.h` (renamed to
`IRCore.h`) because `PyConcreteValue`, `PyConcreteType`,
`PyConcreteAttribute` depend on them. This makes for a bigger PR than
one would hope for but ultimately I think we should give people access
to these classes to use as they see fit (specifically inherit from, but
also liberally use in bindings signatures instead of the opaque `Mlir*`
struct wrappers).
2. Put all of this code into a nested namespace
`MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_DOMAIN` which is determined by a compile time
define (and tied to `MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_NB_DOMAIN`). This is necessary
in order to prevent conflicts on both symbol name **and** typeid
(necessary for nanobind to not double register binded types) between
multiple bindings libraries (e.g., `torch-mlir`, and `jax`). Note
[nanobind doesn't support `module_local` like
pybind11](https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/porting.html#removed-features).
It does support `NB_DOMAIN` but that is not sufficient for
disambiguating typeids across projects (to wit: we currently define
`NB_DOMAIN` and it was still necessary to move everything to a nested
namespace);
3. Build the [nanobind library itself as a shared
object](https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/blob/master/cmake/nanobind-config.cmake#L127)
(and link it to both the extensions and `MLIRPythonSupport`).
4. CMake to make this work, in-tree, out-of-tree, downstream, upstream,
etc.
# Testing
Three tests are added here
1. `PythonTestModuleNanobind` is ported to use
`PyConcreteType<PyTestType>` instead of `mlir_type_subclass` and
`PyConcreteAttribute<PyTestAttr>` instead of `mlir_atrr_subclass`,
verifying this works for non-core extensions in-tree;
2. `StandaloneExtensionNanobind` is ported to use `struct PyCustomType :
mlir::python::MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_DOMAIN::PyConcreteType<PyCustomType>`
instead of `mlir_type_subclass` verifying this works for non-core
extensions out-of-tree;
3. `StandaloneExtensionNanobind`'s `smoketest` is extended to also load
another bindings package (namely `mlir`) verifying
`MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_DOMAIN` successfully disambiguates symbols and
typeids.
I have also tested this downstream:
https://github.com/llvm/eudsl/pull/287 as well run the following builder
bots:
mlir-nvidia-gcc7:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/buildrequests/6654424?redirect_to_build=true
I have also tested against IREE:
https://github.com/iree-org/iree/pull/21916
# Integration
It is highly recommended to set the CMake var
`MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_NB_DOMAIN` (which will also determine
`MLIR_BINDINGS_PYTHON_DOMAIN`) to something unique for each downstream.
This can also be passed explicitly to `add_mlir_python_modules` if your
project builds multiple bindings packages. I added a `WARNING` to this
effect in `AddMLIRPython.cmake`.
[^3]: Python values being typed correctly when exiting from cpp;
[^1]: Specifically when the modules are imported using `importlib`,
which occurs with nanobind's
[stubgen](https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/blob/master/src/stubgen.py#L965);
[^2]: The workaround we implemented was a class method for the dialect
bindings called `Class.isinstance(...)`;
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157930 broke bazel build (see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157930#issuecomment-3318681217)
because bazel is stricter on implicit conversions (some difference in
flags passed to clang). This PR fixes by moving/removing `nb::typed`.
EDIT: and also the overlay...
This a reland of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155741 which
was reverted at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157831. This
version is narrower in scope - it only turns on automatic stub
generation for `MLIRPythonExtension.Core._mlir` and **does not do
anything automatically**. Specifically, the only CMake code added to
`AddMLIRPython.cmake` is the `mlir_generate_type_stubs` function which
is then used only in a manual way. The API for
`mlir_generate_type_stubs` is:
```
Arguments:
MODULE_NAME: The fully-qualified name of the extension module (used for importing in python).
DEPENDS_TARGETS: List of targets these type stubs depend on being built; usually corresponding to the
specific extension module (e.g., something like StandalonePythonModules.extension._standaloneDialectsNanobind.dso)
and the core bindings extension module (e.g., something like StandalonePythonModules.extension._mlir.dso).
OUTPUT_DIR: The root output directory to emit the type stubs into.
OUTPUTS: List of expected outputs.
DEPENDS_TARGET_SRC_DEPS: List of cpp sources for extension library (for generating a DEPFILE).
IMPORT_PATHS: List of paths to add to PYTHONPATH for stubgen.
PATTERN_FILE: (Optional) Pattern file (see https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/typing.html#pattern-files).
Outputs:
NB_STUBGEN_CUSTOM_TARGET: The target corresponding to generation which other targets can depend on.
```
Downstream users should use `mlir_generate_type_stubs` in coordination
with `declare_mlir_python_sources` to turn on stub generation for their
own downstream dialect extensions and upstream dialect extensions if
they so choose. Standalone example shows an example.
Note, downstream will also need to set
`-DMLIR_PYTHON_PACKAGE_PREFIX=...` correctly for their bindings.
This is a companion to #118583, although it can be landed independently
because since #117922 dialects do not have to use the same Python
binding framework as the Python core code.
This PR ports all of the in-tree dialect and pass extensions to
nanobind, with the exception of those that remain for testing pybind11
support.
This PR also:
* removes CollectDiagnosticsToStringScope from NanobindAdaptors.h. This
was overlooked in a previous PR and it is duplicated in Diagnostics.h.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacques Pienaar <jpienaar@google.com>
Relands #118583, with a fix for Python 3.8 compatibility. It was not
possible to set the buffer protocol accessers via slots in Python 3.8.
Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.
For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.
To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::` to `nanobind::`.
Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.
For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.
To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::`
to `nanobind::`.
Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
Right now `inferTypeOpInterface.inferReturnTypes` fails because there's a cast in there to `py::sequence` which throws a `TypeError` when it tries to cast the `None`s. Note `None`s are inserted into `operands` for omitted operands passed to the generated builder:
```
operands.append(_get_op_result_or_value(start) if start is not None else None)
operands.append(_get_op_result_or_value(stop) if stop is not None else None)
operands.append(_get_op_result_or_value(step) if step is not None else None)
```
Note also that skipping appending to the list operands doesn't work either because [[ 27c37327da/mlir/lib/Bindings/Python/IRCore.cpp (L1585) | build generic ]] checks against the number of operand segments expected.
Currently the only way around is to handroll through `ir.Operation.create`.
Reviewed By: rkayaith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151409
depends on D150839
This diff uses `MlirTypeID` to register `TypeCaster`s (i.e., `[](PyType pyType) -> DerivedTy { return pyType; }`) for all concrete types (i.e., `PyConcrete<...>`) that are then queried for (by `MlirTypeID`) and called in `struct type_caster<MlirType>::cast`. The result is that anywhere an `MlirType mlirType` is returned from a python binding, that `mlirType` is automatically cast to the correct concrete type. For example:
```
c0 = arith.ConstantOp(f32, 0.0)
# CHECK: F32Type(f32)
print(repr(c0.result.type))
unranked_tensor_type = UnrankedTensorType.get(f32)
unranked_tensor = tensor.FromElementsOp(unranked_tensor_type, [c0]).result
# CHECK: UnrankedTensorType
print(type(unranked_tensor.type).__name__)
# CHECK: UnrankedTensorType(tensor<*xf32>)
print(repr(unranked_tensor.type))
```
This functionality immediately extends to typed attributes (i.e., `attr.type`).
The diff also implements similar functionality for `mlir_type_subclass`es but in a slightly different way - for such types (which have no cpp corresponding `class` or `struct`) the user must provide a type caster in python (similar to how `AttrBuilder` works) or in cpp as a `py::cpp_function`.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150927
Add C and python bindings for InferShapedTypeOpInterface
and ShapedTypeComponents. This allows users to invoke
InferShapedTypeOpInterface for ops that implement it.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149494
This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to an operation. Attribute can also be stored inside the properties
storage if desired, but any kind of data can be present as well. This offers
a way to store and mutate data without uniquing in the Context like Attribute.
See the OpPropertiesTest.cpp for an example where a struct with a
std::vector<> is attached to an operation and mutated in-place:
struct TestProperties {
int a = -1;
float b = -1.;
std::vector<int64_t> array = {-33};
};
More complex scheme (including reference-counting) are also possible.
The only constraint to enable storing a C++ object as "properties" on an
operation is to implement three functions:
- convert from the candidate object to an Attribute
- convert from the Attribute to the candidate object
- hash the object
Optional the parsing and printing can also be customized with 2 extra
functions.
A new options is introduced to ODS to allow dialects to specify:
let usePropertiesForAttributes = 1;
When set to true, the inherent attributes for all the ops in this dialect
will be using properties instead of being stored alongside discardable
attributes.
The TestDialect showcases this feature.
Another change is that we introduce new APIs on the Operation class
to access separately the inherent attributes from the discardable ones.
We envision deprecating and removing the `getAttr()`, `getAttrsDictionary()`,
and other similar method which don't make the distinction explicit, leading
to an entirely separate namespace for discardable attributes.
Recommit d572cd1b067f after fixing python bindings build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141742
Previously we only allowed the flattened list passed in, but the same
input provided here as to buildGeneric so flatten accordingly. We have
less info here than in buildGeneric so the error is more generic if
unpacking fails.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143240
Introduce the initial support for operation interfaces in C API and Python
bindings. Interfaces are a key component of MLIR's extensibility and should be
available in bindings to make use of full potential of MLIR.
This initial implementation exposes InferTypeOpInterface all the way to the
Python bindings since it can be later used to simplify the operation
construction methods by inferring their return types instead of requiring the
user to do so. The general infrastructure for binding interfaces is defined and
InferTypeOpInterface can be used as an example for binding other interfaces.
Reviewed By: gysit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111656
