Summary: Vector of the same value with few undefs will sill be considered "Bytewise"
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: dexonsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64031
llvm-svn: 365971
Summary:
This helps with more efficient use of memset for pattern initialization
From @pcc prototype for -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern optimizations
Binary size change on CTMark, (with -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--icf=all, similar results with default linker options)
```
master patch diff
Os 8.238864e+05 8.238864e+05 0.0
O3 1.054797e+06 1.054797e+06 0.0
Os zero 8.292384e+05 8.292384e+05 0.0
O3 zero 1.062626e+06 1.062626e+06 0.0
Os pattern 8.579712e+05 8.338048e+05 -0.030299
O3 pattern 1.090502e+06 1.067574e+06 -0.020481
```
Zero vs Pattern on master
```
zero pattern diff
Os 8.292384e+05 8.579712e+05 0.036578
O3 1.062626e+06 1.090502e+06 0.025124
```
Zero vs Pattern with the patch
```
zero pattern diff
Os 8.292384e+05 8.338048e+05 0.003333
O3 1.062626e+06 1.067574e+06 0.003193
```
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63967
llvm-svn: 365858
This patch replaces the three almost identical "strip & accumulate"
implementations for constant pointer offsets with a single one,
combining the respective functionalities. The old interfaces are kept
for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64468
llvm-svn: 365723
Summary:
We will need to handle IntToPtr which I will submit in a separate patch as it's
not going to be NFC.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63940
llvm-svn: 365709
This makes the functions in Loads.h require a type to be specified
independently of the pointer Value so that when pointers have no structure
other than address-space, it can still do its job.
Most callers had an obvious memory operation handy to provide this type, but a
SROA and ArgumentPromotion were doing more complicated analysis. They get
updated to merge the properties of the various instructions they were
considering.
llvm-svn: 365468
The `willreturn` function attribute guarantees that a function call will
come back to the call site if the call is also known not to throw.
Therefore, this attribute can be used in
`isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor`.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63372
llvm-svn: 364580
I find the current documentation of poison somewhat confusing,
mainly because its use of "undefined behavior" doesn't seem to
align with our usual interpretation (of immediate UB). Especially
the sentence "any instruction that has a dependence on a poison
value has undefined behavior" is very confusing.
Clarify poison semantics by:
* Replacing the introductory paragraph with the standard rationale
for having poison values.
* Spelling out that instructions depending on poison return poison.
* Spelling out how we go from a poison value to immediate undefined
behavior and give the two examples we currently use in ValueTracking.
* Spelling out that side effects depending on poison are UB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63044
llvm-svn: 363320
I recently got this wrong (again), and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Put a comment in the logical place someone would look to "fix" the obvious "missed optimization" which arrises based on the common misunderstanding. Hopefully, this will save others time. :)
llvm-svn: 363318
Summary:
The logic in EarlyCSE that looks through 'not' operations in the
predicate recognizes e.g. that `select (not (cmp sgt X, Y)), X, Y` is
equivalent to `select (cmp sgt X, Y), Y, X`. Without this change,
however, only the latter is recognized as a form of `smin X, Y`, so the
two expressions receive different hash codes. This leads to missed
optimization opportunities when the quadratic probing for the two hashes
doesn't happen to collide, and assertion failures when probing doesn't
collide on insertion but does collide on a subsequent table grow
operation.
This change inverts the order of some of the pattern matching, checking
first for the optional `not` and then for the min/max/abs patterns, so
that e.g. both expressions above are recognized as a form of `smin X, Y`.
It also adds an assertion to isEqual verifying that it implies equal
hash codes; this fires when there's a collision during insertion, not
just grow, and so will make it easier to notice if these functions fall
out of sync again. A new flag --earlycse-debug-hash is added which can
be used when changing the hash function; it forces hash collisions so
that any pair of values inserted which compare as equal but hash
differently will be caught by the isEqual assertion.
Reviewers: spatel, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel, nikic
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, arsenm, craig.topper, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62644
llvm-svn: 363274
In order to fold an always overflowing signed saturating add/sub,
we need to know in which direction the always overflow occurs.
This patch splits up AlwaysOverflows into AlwaysOverflowsLow and
AlwaysOverflowsHigh to pass through this information (but it is
not used yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62463
llvm-svn: 361858
The implementation in ValueTracking and ConstantRange are equally
powerful, reuse the one in ConstantRange, which will make this easier
to extend.
llvm-svn: 361723
This reverts commit 3b137a495686bd6018d115ea82fb8bb7718349fd.
As reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60846, this is causing
miscompiles.
llvm-svn: 360260
Summary:
Both the input Value pointer and the returned Value
pointers in GetUnderlyingObjects are now declared as
const.
It turned out that all current (in-tree) uses of
GetUnderlyingObjects were trivial to update, being
satisfied with have those Value pointers declared
as const. Actually, in the past several of the users
had to use const_cast, just because of ValueTracking
not providing a version of GetUnderlyingObjects with
"const" Value pointers. With this patch we get rid
of those const casts.
Reviewers: hfinkel, materi, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: dexonsmith, jkorous, jholewinski, sdardis, eraman, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61038
llvm-svn: 359072
ConstantRanges have an annoying special case: If upper and lower are
the same, it can be either an empty or a full set. When constructing
constant ranges nearly always a full set is intended, but this still
requires an explicit check in many places.
This revision adds a getNonEmpty() constructor that disambiguates this
case: If upper and lower are the same, a full set is created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60947
llvm-svn: 358854
This adds a WithOverflowInst class with a few helper methods to get
the underlying binop, signedness and nowrap type and makes use of it
where sensible. There will be two more uses in D60650/D60656.
The refactorings are all NFC, though I left some TODOs where things
could be improved. In particular we have two places where add/sub are
handled but mul isn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60668
llvm-svn: 358512
This is a follow-up patch to D60504 to further improve
performance issues in computeKnownBitsFromAssume.
The patch is NFC, but may improve compile-time performance
if the compiler isn't clever enough to do the optimization
itself.
llvm-svn: 358163
This patch changes the order of pattern matching by first testing
a compare instruction's predicate, before doing the pattern
match for the whole expression tree.
Patch by Paul Walker.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60504
llvm-svn: 358097
This is the same change as D60420 but for signed sub rather than
signed add: Range information is intersected into the known bits
result, allows to detect more no/always overflow conditions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60469
llvm-svn: 358020
This is D59386 for the signed add case. The computeConstantRange()
result is now intersected into the existing known bits information,
allowing to detect additional no-overflow/always-overflow conditions
(though the latter isn't used yet).
This (finally...) covers the motivating case from D59071.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60420
llvm-svn: 358014
Switch part of the computeOverflowForSignedAdd() implementation to
use Range.isAllNegative() rather than KnownBits.isNegative() and
similar. They do the same thing, but using the ConstantRange methods
allows dropping the KnownBits variables more easily in D60420.
llvm-svn: 357969
Add support for min/max flavor selects in computeConstantRange(),
which allows us to fold comparisons of a min/max against a constant
in InstSimplify. This fixes an infinite InstCombine loop, with the
test case taken from D59378.
Relative to the previous iteration, this contains some adjustments for
AMDGPU med3 tests: The AMDGPU target runs InstSimplify prior to codegen,
which ends up constant folding some existing med3 tests after this
change. To preserve these tests a hidden -amdgpu-scalar-ir-passes option
is added, which allows disabling scalar IR passes (that use InstSimplify)
for testing purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59506
llvm-svn: 357870
This adds ConstantRange::getFull(BitWidth) and
ConstantRange::getEmpty(BitWidth) named constructors as more readable
alternatives to the current ConstantRange(BitWidth, /* full */ false)
and similar. Additionally private getFull() and getEmpty() member
functions are added which return a full/empty range with the same bit
width -- these are commonly needed inside ConstantRange.cpp.
The IsFullSet argument in the ConstantRange(BitWidth, IsFullSet)
constructor is now mandatory for the few usages that still make use of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59716
llvm-svn: 356852
We're already computing the known bits of the operands here. If the
known bits of the operands can determine the sign bit of the result,
we'll already catch this in signedAddMayOverflow(). The only other
way (and as the comment already indicates) we'll get new information
from computing known bits on the whole add, is if there's an assumption
on it.
As such, we change the code to only compute known bits from assumptions,
instead of computing full known bits on the add (which would unnecessarily
recompute the known bits of the operands as well).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59473
llvm-svn: 356785
This is D59450, but for signed sub. This case is not NFC, because
the overflow logic in ConstantRange is more powerful than the existing
check. This resolves the TODO in the function.
I've added two tests to show that this indeed catches more cases than
the previous logic, but the main correctness test coverage here is in
the existing ConstantRange unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59617
llvm-svn: 356685
This is a small followup to D59511. The code that was moved into
computeConstantRange() there is a bit overly conversative: If the
abs is not nsw, it does not compute any range. However, abs without
nsw still has a well-defined contiguous unsigned range from 0 to
SIGNED_MIN. This is a lot less useful than the usual 0 to SIGNED_MAX
range, but if we're already here we might as well specify it...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59563
llvm-svn: 356586
Improve computeOverflowForUnsignedAdd/Sub in ValueTracking by
intersecting the computeConstantRange() result into the ConstantRange
created from computeKnownBits(). This allows us to detect some
additional never/always overflows conditions that can't be determined
from known bits.
This revision also adds basic handling for constants to
computeConstantRange(). Non-splat vectors will be handled in a followup.
The signed case will also be handled in a followup, as it needs some
more groundwork.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59386
llvm-svn: 356489
These changes are related to PR37743 and include:
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect handles the unary SelectPatternFlavor::SPF_ABS case to build ABS node.
Delete the redundant recognizer of the integer ABS pattern from the DAGCombiner.
Add promoting the integer ABS node in the LegalizeIntegerType.
Expand-based legalization of integer result for the ABS nodes.
Expand-based legalization of ABS vector operations.
Add some integer abs testcases for different typesizes for Thumb arch
Add the custom ABS expanding and change the SAD pattern recognizer for X86 arch: The i64 result of the ABS is expanded to:
tmp = (SRA, Hi, 31)
Lo = (UADDO tmp, Lo)
Hi = (XOR tmp, (ADDCARRY tmp, hi, Lo:1))
Lo = (XOR tmp, Lo)
The "detectZextAbsDiff" function is changed for the recognition of pattern with the ABS node. Given a ABS node, detect the following pattern:
(ABS (SUB (ZERO_EXTEND a), (ZERO_EXTEND b))).
Change integer abs testcases for codegen with the ABS node support for AArch64.
Indicate that the ABS is legal for the i64 type when the NEON is supported.
Change the integer abs testcases to show changing of codegen.
Add combine and legalization of ABS nodes for Thumb arch.
Extend 'matchSelectPattern' to recognize the ABS patterns with ICMP_SGE condition.
For discussion, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Patch by: @ikulagin (Ivan Kulagin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49837
llvm-svn: 356468
Add support for min/max flavor selects in computeConstantRange(),
which allows us to fold comparisons of a min/max against a constant
in InstSimplify. This was suggested by spatel as an alternative
approach to D59378. I've also added the infinite looping test from
that revision here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59506
llvm-svn: 356415
This is preparation for D59506. The InstructionSimplify abs handling
is moved into computeConstantRange(), which is the general place for
such calculations. This is NFC and doesn't affect the existing tests
in test/Transforms/InstSimplify/icmp-abs-nabs.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59511
llvm-svn: 356409
This is the same change as rL356290, but for signed add. It replaces
the existing ripple logic with the overflow logic in ConstantRange.
This is NFC in that it should return NeverOverflow in exactly the
same cases as the previous implementation. However, it does make
computeOverflowForSignedAdd() more powerful by now also determining
AlwaysOverflows conditions. As none of its consumers handle this yet,
this has no impact on optimization. Making use of AlwaysOverflows
in with.overflow folding will be handled as a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450
llvm-svn: 356345
Following the suggestion in D59450, I'm moving the code for constructing
a ConstantRange from KnownBits out of ValueTracking, which also allows us
to test this code independently.
I'm adding this method to ConstantRange rather than KnownBits (which
would have been a bit nicer API wise) to avoid creating a dependency
from Support to IR, where ConstantRange lives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59475
llvm-svn: 356339
Use the methods introduced in rL356276 to implement the
computeOverflowForUnsigned(Add|Sub) functions in ValueTracking, by
converting the KnownBits into a ConstantRange.
This is NFC: The existing KnownBits based implementation uses the same
logic as the the ConstantRange based one. This is not the case for the
signed equivalents, so I'm only changing unsigned here.
This is in preparation for D59386, which will also intersect the
computeConstantRange() result into the range determined from KnownBits.
llvm-svn: 356290
InstructionSimplify currently has some code to determine the constant
range of integer instructions for some simple cases. It is used to
simplify icmps.
This change moves the relevant code into ValueTracking as
llvm::computeConstantRange(), so it can also be reused for other
purposes.
In particular this is with the optimization of overflow checks in
mind (ref D59071), where constant ranges cover some cases that
known bits don't.
llvm-svn: 355781
There are no tests for this case, and I'm not sure how it could ever work,
so I'm just removing this option from the matcher. This should fix PR40940:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40940
llvm-svn: 355292
We have two sources of known bits:
1. For adds leading ones of either operand are preserved. For sub
leading zeros of LHS and leading ones of RHS become leading zeros in
the result.
2. The saturating math is a select between add/sub and an all-ones/
zero value. As such we can carry out the add/sub known bits
calculation, and only preseve the known one/zero bits respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58329
llvm-svn: 355223
Second part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a - b overflows iff a < b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and b subject to the known bits
constraint.
llvm-svn: 355109
Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.
This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650
llvm-svn: 355099
Part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a + b overflows iff a > ~b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and ~b subject to the known bits
constraint.
llvm-svn: 355072
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
Bitcast and certain Ptr2Int/Int2Ptr instructions will not alter the
value of their operand and can therefore be looked through when we
determine non-nullness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54956
llvm-svn: 352293
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
