Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
that mechanism anymore, we don't need to declare __libcpp_verbose_abort
from all public headers, and we can clean up a lot of unnecessary
includes.
This patch also moves the definition of the various assertion categories
to the <__assert> header, since we now rely on regular IWYU for these
assertion macros.
rdar://105510916
We noticed that some feature-test macros were not conditional on
configuration flags like _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_FILESYSTEM. As a result, code
attempting to use FTMs would not work as intended.
This patch adds conditionals for a few feature-test macros, but more
issues may exist.
rdar://122020466
This reverts commit 7d9b5aa65b09126031e1c2903605a7d34aea4bc1 since
std/utilities/format/format.arguments/format.arg/visit.return_type.pass.cpp
is failing on Windows when building with Clang-cl.
Finishes implementation of
- P2093R14 Formatted output
- P2539R4 Should the output of std::print to a terminal be synchronized
with the underlying stream?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156609
This makes libc++'s <filesystem> tests compatible with MSVC's STL.
In msvc_stdlib_force_include.h, we need to define 3 more macros:
- _CRT_DECLARE_NONSTDC_NAMES activates the POSIX names of
`getcwd` etc. As the comment explains, we need this because
we test with Clang `-fno-ms-compatibility`, which defines
`__STDC__` to `1`, which causes the UCRT headers to disable
the POSIX names by default.
- Then we need _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS to avoid emitting
deprecation warnings about the POSIX names.
- Finally, we need `NOMINMAX` to seal away the ancient evil.
These macros are documented in https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/compatibility?view=msvc-170.
As a drive-by change, the patch adds a "simulated" macro for
__has_feature(hwaddress_sanitizer). It also clang-formats all
of msvc_stdlib_force_include.h and removes guards for
__has_builtin(__builtin_source_location) in <source_location>,
since those are not needed anymore.
This paper was voted in as a DR, so it's retroactively enabled back to
C++20; the C++ version that introduced std::format.
Implements:
- P2909R4 Fix formatting of code units as integers (Dude, where’s my
``char``?)
This makes the conditionals quite a bit simpler to understand, since it
avoids double negatives and makes sure we have <__availability>
included. For vendors which use availability macros, it also enforces
that they check when specific features are introduced and define the
macro for their platform appropriately.
This patch brings std::ios_base::noreplace from P2467R1 to libc++.
This requires compiling the shared library in C++23 mode since otherwise
fstream::open(...) doesn't know about the new flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137640
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
This patch implements `std::basic_syncbuf` and `std::basic_osyncstream` as specified in paper p0053r7. ~~For ease of reviewing I am submitting this patch before submitting a patch for `std::basic_osyncstream`. ~~
~~Please note, this patch is not 100% complete. I plan on adding more tests (see comments), specifically I plan on adding tests for multithreading and synchronization.~~
Edit: I decided that it would be far easier for me to keep track of this and make changes that affect both `std::basic_syncbuf` and `std::basic_osyncstream` if both were in one patch.
The patch was originally written by @zoecarver
Implements
- P0053R7 - C++ Synchronized Buffered Ostream
- LWG-3127 basic_osyncstream::rdbuf needs a const_cast
- LWG-3334 basic_osyncstream move assignment and destruction calls basic_syncbuf::emit() twice
- LWG-3570 basic_osyncstream::emit should be an unformatted output function
- LWG-3867 Should std::basic_osyncstream's move assignment operator be noexcept?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67086
According to https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/, quite a few of
our availability macros don't do anything anymore, so we might as well
remove them to clean up the code a bit.
This implements layout_stride for C++23 and with that completes the
implementation of the C++23 mdspan header. The feature test macro is
added, and the status pages updated.
Co-authored-by: Damien L-G <dalg24@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157171
`print` functions require `FILE` and `stdout` to be available and cause
compilation errors on platforms that don't support the file system.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156585
Drive-by fix to make sure the __retarget_buffer works correctly whan
using a hint of 1. This was discovered in one of the new tests.
Drive-by fixes __retarget_buffer when initialized with size 1.
Implements parts of
- P2093R14 Formatted output
- P2539R4 Should the output of std::print to a terminal be
synchronized with the underlying stream?
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150044
The feature is applied as DR instead of a normal paper. MSVC STL and
libstdc++ will do the same.
Implements
- P2510R3 Formatting pointers
Depends on D153192
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153195
Implement P2494R2 `Relaxing range adaptors to allow for move only types`
https://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2494r2.html#wording-ftm
According to the words in P2494R2, I haven't add new test for `drop_while_view`, `take_while_view` and `filter_view`, because these views has the requirement that the predicate is an `indirect_unary_predicate`, which requires that the predicate is `copy_constructible`, so they still can't accept move only types as predicate.
```
[P2483R0] also suggests future work to relax the requirements on the predicate types stored by standard views. This paper does not perform this relaxation, as the copy constructibility requirement is enshrined in the indirect callable concepts ([indirectcallable.indirectinvocable]). Thus, while this paper modifies the views that currently use copyable-box for user provided predicates, it only does so to apply the rename of the exposition-only type to movable-box; it does not change any of the constraints on those views. It does, however, relax the requirements on invocables accepted by the transform family of views, because those are not constrained using the indirect callable concepts.
```
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151629
This fixes rdar://110330781, which asked for the feature-test macro
for std::pmr to take into account the deployment target. It doesn't
fix https://llvm.org/PR62212, though, because the availability markup
itself must be disabled until some Clang bugs have been fixed.
This is pretty vexing, however at least everything should work once
those Clang bugs have been fixed. In the meantime, this patch at least
adds the required markup (as disabled) and ensures that the feature-test
macro for std::pmr is aware of the deployment target requirement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135813
Like yocto, zepto, zetta, and yotta. The new prefixes quecto, ronto,
ronna, and quetta can't be implemented in a intmax_t. So their
implementation does nothing.
Implements
- P2734R0 Adding the new SI prefixes
Depends on D153192
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153200
This FTM was introduced in
P0553R4 Bit operations
Which has been implemented since libc++ 9.
This was noticed while working on D153192.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153225
This updates:
- The status tables
- Feature test macros
- New headers for modules
The latter avoids forgetting about modules when implementing the feature
in a new header.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153192
This makes it clearer that the availability macro only pertains to
<filesystem>, and not to whether the platform has support for a file
system.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152172
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: #libc, kwk, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150763
The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI
breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150802
Clang has been updated to support C++26, this adds the same support for
libc++. At the moment C++23 and C++26 are identical. During the next
plenary in June the first C++26 papers will be voted on.
Note like Clang this patch uses C++26 is the internal part and C++2c in
the user visible part.
Depends on D150795
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151026
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Note since we use clang-tidy 16 a small work-around is needed. Clang
knows -std=c++23 but clang-tidy not so for now force the lit compiler
flag to use -std=c++2b instead of -std=c++23.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, jloser, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150795
