973 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teresa Johnson
3adc6e0308 [ThinLTO] Remove BlockCount for non partial sample profile builds
As pointed out in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/undeterministic-thin-index-file/69985, the
block count added to distributed ThinLTO index files breaks incremental
builds on ThinLTO - if any linked file has a different number of BBs,
then the accumulated sum placed in the index files will change, causing
all ThinLTO backend compiles to be redone.

The block count is only used for scaling of partial sample profiles, and
was added in D80403 for D79831.

This patch simply removes this field from the index files of non partial
sample profile compiles, which is NFC on the output of the compiler.

We subsequently need to see if this can be removed for partial sample
profiles without signficant performance loss, or redesigned in a way
that does not destroy caching.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148746
2023-04-20 11:45:15 -07:00
Nikita Popov
bbfb13a5ff [ConstExpr] Remove select constant expression
This removes the select constant expression, as part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
Uses of this expressions have already been removed in advance,
so this just removes related infrastructure and updates tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145382
2023-03-16 10:32:08 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
01dacc41f3 [Bitcode] Remove typed pointer abbreviation
Since typed pointers are deprecated.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144901
2023-02-27 13:11:09 -08:00
Matt Arsenault
5da674492a IR: Add nofpclass parameter attribute
This carries a bitmask indicating forbidden floating-point value kinds
in the argument or return value. This will enable interprocedural
-ffinite-math-only optimizations. This is primarily to cover the
no-nans and no-infinities cases, but also covers the other floating
point classes for free. Textually, this provides a number of names
corresponding to bits in FPClassTest, e.g.

  call nofpclass(nan inf) @must_be_finite()
  call nofpclass(snan) @cannot_be_snan()

This is more expressive than the existing nnan and ninf fast math
flags. As an added bonus, you can represent fun things like nanf:

  declare nofpclass(inf zero sub norm) float @only_nans()

Compared to nnan/ninf:
  - Can be applied to individual call operands as well as the return value
  - Can distinguish signaling and quiet nans
  - Distinguishes the sign of infinities
  - Can be safely propagated since it doesn't imply anything about
    other operands.
  - Does not apply to FP instructions; it's not a flag

This is one step closer to being able to retire "no-nans-fp-math" and
"no-infs-fp-math". The one remaining situation where we have no way to
represent no-nans/infs is for loads (if we wanted to solve this we
could introduce !nofpclass metadata, following along with
noundef/!noundef).

This is to help simplify the GPU builtin math library
distribution. Currently the library code has explicit finite math only
checks, read from global constants the compiler driver needs to set
based on the compiler flags during linking. We end up having to
internalize the library into each translation unit in case different
linked modules have different math flags. By propagating known-not-nan
and known-not-infinity information, we can automatically prune the
edge case handling in most functions if the function is only reached
from fast math uses.
2023-02-24 07:41:29 -04:00
Archibald Elliott
62c7f035b4 [NFC][TargetParser] Remove llvm/ADT/Triple.h
I also ran `git clang-format` to get the headers in the right order for
the new location, which has changed the order of other headers in two
files.
2023-02-07 12:39:46 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
778cf5431c IR: Add atomicrmw uinc_wrap and udec_wrap
These are essentially add/sub 1 with a clamping value.

AMDGPU has instructions for these. CUDA/HIP expose these as
atomicInc/atomicDec. Currently we use target intrinsics for these,
but those do no carry the ordering and syncscope. Add these to
atomicrmw so we can carry these and benefit from the regular
legalization processes.
2023-01-24 17:55:11 -04:00
Joshua Cranmer
e6b02214c6 [IR] Add a target extension type to LLVM.
Target-extension types represent types that need to be preserved through
optimization, but otherwise are not introspectable by target-independent
optimizations. This patch doesn't add any uses of these types by an existing
backend, it only provides basic infrastructure such that these types would work
correctly.

Reviewed By: nikic, barannikov88

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135202
2022-12-20 11:02:11 -05:00
Kazu Hirata
f7dffc28b3 Don't include None.h (NFC)
I've converted all known uses of None to std::nullopt, so we no longer
need to include None.h.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-10 11:24:26 -08:00
Jonas Hahnfeld
c9cb4fc761 [DebugInfo] Store optional DIFile::Source as pointer
getCanonicalMDString() also returns a nullptr for empty strings, which
tripped over the getSource() method. Solve the ambiguity of no source
versus an optional containing a nullptr by simply storing a pointer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138658
2022-12-08 09:58:33 +01:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
49e75ebd85 [Bitcode(Reader|Writer)] Convert Optional to std::optional 2022-12-07 15:27:38 -08:00
Fangrui Song
89fae41ef1 [IR] llvm::Optional => std::optional
Many llvm/IR/* files have been migrated by other contributors.
This migrates most remaining files.
2022-12-05 04:13:11 +00:00
Kazu Hirata
e9e64f7c9e [Bitcode] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-02 20:36:05 -08:00
Fangrui Song
f199f97c72 ModuleSummaryAnalysis: Internalize some cl::opt 2022-11-23 17:33:34 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
9eacbba290 Restore "[MemProf] ThinLTO summary support" with more fixes
This restores commit 98ed423361de2f9dc0113a31be2aa04524489ca9 and
follow on fix 00c22351ba697dbddb4b5bf0ad94e4bcea4b316b, which were
reverted in 5d938eb6f79b16f55266dd23d5df831f552ea082 due to an
MSVC bot failure. I've included a fix for that failure.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135714
2022-11-16 09:42:41 -08:00
Jeremy Morse
5d938eb6f7 Revert "Restore "[MemProf] ThinLTO summary support" with fixes"
This reverts commit 00c22351ba697dbddb4b5bf0ad94e4bcea4b316b.
This reverts commit 98ed423361de2f9dc0113a31be2aa04524489ca9.

Seemingly MSVC has some kind of issue with this patch, in terms of linking:

  https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/14137

I'll post more detail on D135714 momentarily.
2022-11-16 11:21:02 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
98ed423361 Restore "[MemProf] ThinLTO summary support" with fixes
This restores 47459455009db4790ffc3765a2ec0f8b4934c2a4, which was
reverted in commit 452a14efc84edf808d1e2953dad2c694972b312f, along with
fixes for a couple of bot failures.
2022-11-15 08:55:17 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
452a14efc8 Revert "[MemProf] ThinLTO summary support"
This reverts commit 47459455009db4790ffc3765a2ec0f8b4934c2a4.

Revert while I try to fix a couple of non-Linux build failures.
2022-11-15 07:39:40 -08:00
Teresa Johnson
4745945500 [MemProf] ThinLTO summary support
Implements the ThinLTO summary support for memprof related metadata.

This includes support for the assembly format, and for building the
summary from IR during ModuleSummaryAnalysis.

To reduce space in both the bitcode format and the in memory index,
we do 2 things:
1. We keep a single vector of all uniq stack id hashes, and record the
   index into this vector in the callsite and allocation memprof
   summaries.
2. When building the combined index during the LTO link, the callsite
   and allocation memprof summaries are only kept on the FunctionSummary
   of the prevailing copy.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135714
2022-11-15 06:45:12 -08:00
OCHyams
a2620e00ff [Assignment Tracking][3/*] Add DIAssignID metadata boilerplate
The Assignment Tracking debug-info feature is outlined in this RFC:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/
rfc-assignment-tracking-a-better-way-of-specifying-variable-locations-in-ir

Add the DIAssignID metadata attachment boilerplate. Includes a textual-bitcode
roundtrip test and tests that the verifier and parser catch badly formed IR.

This piece of metadata links together stores (used as an attachment) and the
yet-to-be-added llvm.dbg.assign debug intrinsic (used as an operand).

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132222
2022-11-07 09:05:56 +00:00
Nikita Popov
304f1d59ca [IR] Switch everything to use memory attribute
This switches everything to use the memory attribute proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579.
The old argmemonly, inaccessiblememonly and inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly
attributes are dropped. The readnone, readonly and writeonly attributes
are restricted to parameters only.

The old attributes are auto-upgraded both in bitcode and IR.
The bitcode upgrade is a policy requirement that has to be retained
indefinitely. The IR upgrade is mainly there so it's not necessary
to update all tests using memory attributes in this patch, which
is already large enough. We could drop that part after migrating
tests, or retain it longer term, to make it easier to import IR
from older LLVM versions.

High-level Function/CallBase APIs like doesNotAccessMemory() or
setDoesNotAccessMemory() are mapped transparently to the memory
attribute. Code that directly manipulates attributes (e.g. via
AttributeList) on the other hand needs to switch to working with
the memory attribute instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135780
2022-11-04 10:21:38 +01:00
OCHyams
fac26edae5 Revert "[Assignment Tracking][3/*] Add DIAssignID metadata boilerplate"
This reverts commit c285df77e9b78f971f9cd9d025248c20b030cc2a.

A sanitizer bot found an issue:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/28809/steps/13/logs/stdio
2022-11-03 13:46:00 +00:00
OCHyams
e53c4c6d86 [Assignment Tracking][3/*] Add DIAssignID metadata boilerplate
The Assignment Tracking debug-info feature is outlined in this RFC:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/
rfc-assignment-tracking-a-better-way-of-specifying-variable-locations-in-ir

Add the DIAssignID metadata attachment boilerplate. Includes a textual-bitcode
roundtrip test and tests that the verifier and parser catch badly formed IR.

This piece of metadata links together stores (used as an attachment) and the
yet-to-be-added llvm.dbg.assign debug intrinsic (used as an operand).

Reviewed By: jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132222
2022-11-03 11:24:18 +00:00
Nikita Popov
e9754f0211 [IR] Add support for memory attribute
This implements IR and bitcode support for the memory attribute,
as specified in https://reviews.llvm.org/D135597.

The new attribute is not used for anything yet (and as such, the
old memory attributes are unaffected).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135592
2022-10-21 12:11:25 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
ef9956f434 [IR] Rename FuncletPadInst::getNumArgOperands to arg_size (NFC)
This patch renames FuncletPadInst::getNumArgOperands to arg_size for
consistency with CallBase, where getNumArgOperands was removed in
favor of arg_size in commit 3e1c787b3160bed4146d3b2b5f922aeed3caafd7

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136048
2022-10-17 10:15:10 -07:00
Ellis Hoag
12e78ff881 [InstrProf] Add the skipprofile attribute
As discussed in [0], this diff adds the `skipprofile` attribute to
prevent the function from being profiled while allowing profiled
functions to be inlined into it. The `noprofile` attribute remains
unchanged.

The `noprofile` attribute is used for functions where it is
dangerous to add instrumentation to while the `skipprofile` attribute is
used to reduce code size or performance overhead.

[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/why-does-the-noprofile-attribute-restrict-inlining/64108

Reviewed By: phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130807
2022-08-04 08:45:27 -07:00
Joshua Cranmer
2138c90645 [IR] Move support for dxil::TypedPointerType to LLVM core IR.
This allows the construct to be shared between different backends. However, it
still remains illegal to use TypedPointerType in LLVM IR--the type is intended
to remain an auxiliary type, not a real LLVM type. So no support is provided for
LLVM-C, nor bitcode, nor LLVM assembly (besides the bare minimum needed to make
Type->dump() work properly).

Reviewed By: beanz, nikic, aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130592
2022-08-04 10:41:11 -04:00
Schrodinger ZHU Yifan
304027206c [ThinLTO] Support aliased GlobalIFunc
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56290: when an ifunc is
aliased in LTO, clang will attempt to create an alias summary; however, as ifunc
is not included in the module summary, doing so will lead to crash.

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129009
2022-07-20 15:30:38 -07:00
Mitch Phillips
90e5a8ac47 Remove 'no_sanitize_memtag'. Add 'sanitize_memtag'.
For MTE globals, we should have clang emit the attribute for all GV's
that it creates, and then use that in the upcoming AArch64 global
tagging IR pass. We need a positive attribute for this sanitizer (rather
than implicit sanitization of all globals) because it needs to interact
with other parts of LLVM, including:

  1. Suppressing certain global optimisations (like merging),
  2. Emitting extra directives by the ASM writer, and
  3. Putting extra information in the symbol table entries.

While this does technically make the LLVM IR / bitcode format
non-backwards-compatible, nobody should have used this attribute yet,
because it's a no-op.

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128950
2022-07-13 08:54:41 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
2240d72f15 [X86] initial -mfunction-return=thunk-extern support
Adds support for:
* `-mfunction-return=<value>` command line flag, and
* `__attribute__((function_return("<value>")))` function attribute

Where the supported <value>s are:
* keep (disable)
* thunk-extern (enable)

thunk-extern enables clang to change ret instructions into jmps to an
external symbol named __x86_return_thunk, implemented as a new
MachineFunctionPass named "x86-return-thunks", keyed off the new IR
attribute fn_ret_thunk_extern.

The symbol __x86_return_thunk is expected to be provided by the runtime
the compiled code is linked against and is not defined by the compiler.
Enabling this option alone doesn't provide mitigations without
corresponding definitions of __x86_return_thunk!

This new MachineFunctionPass is very similar to "x86-lvi-ret".

The <value>s "thunk" and "thunk-inline" are currently unsupported. It's
not clear yet that they are necessary: whether the thunk pattern they
would emit is beneficial or used anywhere.

Should the <value>s "thunk" and "thunk-inline" become necessary,
x86-return-thunks could probably be merged into x86-retpoline-thunks
which has pre-existing machinery for emitting thunks (which could be
used to implement the <value> "thunk").

Has been found to build+boot with corresponding Linux
kernel patches. This helps the Linux kernel mitigate RETBLEED.
* CVE-2022-23816
* CVE-2022-28693
* CVE-2022-29901

See also:
* "RETBLEED: Arbitrary Speculative Code Execution with Return
Instructions."
* AMD SECURITY NOTICE AMD-SN-1037: AMD CPU Branch Type Confusion
* TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR MITIGATING BRANCH TYPE CONFUSION REVISION 1.0
  2022-07-12
* Return Stack Buffer Underflow / Return Stack Buffer Underflow /
  CVE-2022-29901, CVE-2022-28693 / INTEL-SA-00702

SystemZ may eventually want to support "thunk-extern" and "thunk"; both
options are used by the Linux kernel's CONFIG_EXPOLINE.

This functionality has been available in GCC since the 8.1 release, and
was backported to the 7.3 release.

Many thanks for folks that provided discrete review off list due to the
embargoed nature of this hardware vulnerability. Many Bothans died to
bring us this information.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF6HbCKQHK8
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54404
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01197.html
Link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/return-stack-buffer-underflow.html
Link: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/07/intel-and-amd-cpus-vulnerable-to-a-new-speculative-execution-attack/?comments=1
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ce114c866860aa9eae3f50974efc68241186ba60
Link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00702.html
Link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00707.html

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129572
2022-07-12 09:17:54 -07:00
Shilei Tian
1023ddaf77 [LLVM] Add the support for fmax and fmin in atomicrmw instruction
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
2022-07-06 10:57:53 -04:00
Nikita Popov
7283f48a05 [IR] Remove support for insertvalue constant expression
This removes the insertvalue constant expression, as part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
This is very similar to the extractvalue removal from D125795.
insertvalue is also not supported in bitcode, so no auto-ugprade
is necessary.

ConstantExpr::getInsertValue() can be replaced with
IRBuilder::CreateInsertValue() or ConstantFoldInsertValueInstruction(),
depending on whether a constant result is required (with the latter
being fallible).

The ConstantExpr::hasIndices() and ConstantExpr::getIndices()
methods also go away here, because there are no longer any constant
expressions with indices.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128719
2022-07-04 09:27:22 +02:00
Nikita Popov
16033ffdd9 [ConstExpr] Remove more leftovers of extractvalue expression (NFC)
Remove some leftover bits of extractvalue handling after the
removal in D125795.
2022-06-29 10:45:19 +02:00
Chuanqi Xu
735e6c40b5 [Coroutines] Convert coroutine.presplit to enum attr
This is required by @nikic in https://reviews.llvm.org/D127383 to
decrease the cost to check whether a function is a coroutine and this
fixes a FIXME too.

Reviewed By: rjmccall, ezhulenev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127471
2022-06-14 14:23:46 +08:00
Vitaly Buka
665617182c [Bitcode] Don't use UINT_MAX for missing SanitizerMetadata
Looks like comment on D126100 was unnoticed.
2022-06-10 18:20:55 -07:00
Mitch Phillips
8db981d463 Add sanitizer-specific GlobalValue attributes.
Plan is the migrate the global variable metadata for sanitizers, that's
currently carried around generally in the 'llvm.asan.globals' section,
onto the global variable itself.

This patch adds the attribute and plumbs it through the LLVM IR and
bitcode formats, but is a no-op other than that so far.

Reviewed By: vitalybuka, kstoimenov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126100
2022-06-10 12:28:18 -07:00
Mitch Phillips
5d9de5f446 [NFC] Clang-format parts of D126929 and D126100 2022-06-07 14:08:43 -07:00
Augie Fackler
42861faa8e attributes: introduce allockind attr for describing allocator fn behavior
I chose to encode the allockind information in a string constant because
otherwise we would get a bit of an explosion of keywords to deal with
the possible permutations of allocation function types.

I'm not sure that CodeGen.h is the correct place for this enum, but it
seemed to kind of match the UWTableKind enum so I put it in the same
place. Constructive suggestions on a better location most certainly
encouraged.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123088
2022-05-31 10:01:17 -04:00
Fangrui Song
bb353df589 [Bitcode] Simplify code after FUNC_CODE_BLOCKADDR_USERS changes (D124878)
Switch to the more common `Constant && !GlobalValue` test.
Use the more common `Worklist/Visited` variable names.
2022-05-11 20:27:12 -07:00
Wende Tan
6baaad740a [Bitcode] Include indirect users of BlockAddresses in bitcode
The original fix (commit 23ec5782c3cc) of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52787 only adds `Function`s
that have `Instruction`s that directly use `BlockAddress`es into the
bitcode (`FUNC_CODE_BLOCKADDR_USERS`).

However, in either @rickyz's original reproducing code:

```
void f(long);

__attribute__((noinline)) static void fun(long x) {
  f(x + 1);
}

void repro(void) {
  fun(({
    label:
      (long)&&label;
  }));
}
```

```
...
define dso_local void @repro() #0 {
entry:
  br label %label

label:                                            ; preds = %entry
  tail call fastcc void @fun()
  ret void
}

define internal fastcc void @fun() unnamed_addr #1 {
entry:
  tail call void @f(i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (i8* blockaddress(@repro, %label) to i64), i64 1)) #3
  ret void
}
...
```

or the xfs and overlayfs in the Linux kernel, `BlockAddress`es (e.g.,
`i8* blockaddress(@repro, %label)`) may first compose `ConstantExpr`s
(e.g., `i64 ptrtoint (i8* blockaddress(@repro, %label) to i64)`) and
then used by `Instruction`s. This case is not handled by the original
fix.

This patch adds *indirect* users of `BlockAddress`es, i.e., the
`Instruction`s using some `Constant`s which further use the
`BlockAddress`es, into the bitcode as well, by doing depth-first
searches.

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52787
Fixes: 23ec5782c3cc ("[Bitcode] materialize Functions early when BlockAddress taken")

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124878
2022-05-10 16:03:42 -07:00
Augie Fackler
a907d36cfe Attributes: add a new allocptr attribute
This continues the push away from hard-coded knowledge about functions
towards attributes. We'll use this to annotate free(), realloc() and
cousins and obviate the hard-coded list of free functions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123083
2022-04-26 13:57:11 -04:00
Chris Bieneman
e6f44a3cd2 Add PointerType analysis for DirectX backend
As implemented this patch assumes that Typed pointer support remains in
the llvm::PointerType class, however this could be modified to use a
different subclass of llvm::Type that could be disallowed from use in
other contexts.

This does not rely on inserting typed pointers into the Module, it just
uses the llvm::PointerType class to track and unique types.

Fixes #54918

Reviewed By: kuhar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122268
2022-04-25 17:49:43 -05:00
Ilia Diachkov
6c69427e88 [SPIR-V](3/6) Add MC layer, object file support, and InstPrinter
The patch adds SPIRV-specific MC layer implementation, SPIRV object
file support and SPIRVInstPrinter.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116462

Authors: Aleksandr Bezzubikov, Lewis Crawford, Ilia Diachkov,
Michal Paszkowski, Andrey Tretyakov, Konrad Trifunovic

Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezzubikov <zuban32s@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ilia Diachkov <iliya.diyachkov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Paszkowski <michal.paszkowski@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Tretyakov <andrey1.tretyakov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Konrad Trifunovic <konrad.trifunovic@intel.com>
2022-04-20 01:10:25 +02:00
Chih-Ping Chen
eab6e94f91 [DebugInfo] Add a TargetFuncName field in DISubprogram for
specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature
of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123697
2022-04-15 16:38:23 -04:00
Nick Desaulniers
23ec5782c3 [Bitcode] materialize Functions early when BlockAddress taken
IRLinker builds a work list of functions to materialize, then moves them
from a source module to a destination module one at a time.

This is a problem for blockaddress Constants, since they need not refer
to the function they are used in; IPSCCP is quite good at sinking these
constants deep into other functions when passed as arguments.

This would lead to curious errors during LTO:
  ld.lld: error: Never resolved function from blockaddress ...
based on the ordering of function definitions in IR.

The problem was that IRLinker would basically do:

  for function f in worklist:
    materialize f
    splice f from source module to destination module

in one pass, with Functions being lazily added to the running worklist.
This confuses BitcodeReader, which cannot disambiguate whether a
blockaddress is referring to a function which has not yet been parsed
("materialized") or is simply empty because its body was spliced out.
This causes BitcodeReader to insert Functions into its BasicBlockFwdRefs
list incorrectly, as it will never re-materialize an already
materialized (but spliced out) function.

Because of the possibility that blockaddress Constants may appear in
Functions other than the ones they reference, this patch adds a new
bitcode function code FUNC_CODE_BLOCKADDR_USERS that is a simple list of
Functions that contain BlockAddress Constants that refer back to this
Function, rather then the Function they are scoped in. We then
materialize those functions when materializing `f` from the example loop
above. This might over-materialize Functions should the user of
BitcodeReader ultimately decide not to link those Functions, but we can
at least now we can avoid this ordering related issue with blockaddresses.

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52787
Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1215

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120781
2022-04-12 11:38:35 -07:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis
330268ba34 [Support/Hash functions] Change the final() and result() of the hashing functions to return an array of bytes
Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` is better ergonomics for the hashing functions usage, instead of a `StringRef`:

* When returning `StringRef`, client code is "jumping through hoops" to do string manipulations instead of dealing with fixed array of bytes directly, which is more natural
* Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` avoids the need for the hasher classes to keep a field just for the purpose of wrapping it and returning it as a `StringRef`

As part of this patch also:

* Introduce `TruncatedBLAKE3` which is useful for using BLAKE3 as the hasher type for `HashBuilder` with non-default hash sizes.
* Make `MD5Result` inherit from `std::array<uint8_t, 16>` which improves & simplifies its API.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123100
2022-04-05 21:38:06 -07:00
Chris Bieneman
9130e471fe Add DXContainer
DXIL is wrapped in a container format defined by the DirectX 11
specification. Codebases differ in calling this format either DXBC or
DXILContainer.

Since eventually we want to add support for DXBC as a target
architecture and the format is used by DXBC and DXIL, I've termed it
DXContainer here.

Most of the changes in this patch are just adding cases to switch
statements to address warnings.

Reviewed By: pete

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122062
2022-03-29 14:34:23 -05:00
Nikita Popov
40d7d2ed66 [Bitcode] Check for live uses of llvm.cmdline/embedded.module
The one use check here is very misleading: At this point we should
actually have no uses, because the only possible use in llvm.used
was already dropped. But because the use in llvm.used is generally
bitcasted, we end up still having one dead use here.

What we actually want to check is that there are no live uses, for
which a helper has recently been added.
2022-03-23 15:39:39 +01:00
Nikita Popov
a0d2b0aa65 [Bitcode] Clarify that extractvalue/insertvalue constexprs are not supported
Bitcode currently cannot encode these. Throw a more obvious error
in this case, rather than failing an operand count assertion.
2022-03-11 16:50:24 +01:00
Nikita Popov
b190108693 [Bitcode] Encode alloca address space
Since D101045, allocas are no longer required to be part of the
default alloca address space. There may be allocas in multiple
different address spaces. However, the bitcode reader would
simply assume the default alloca address space, resulting in
either an error or incorrect IR.

Add an optional record for allocas which encodes the address
space.
2022-03-11 16:08:38 +01:00
Augie Fackler
d664c4b73c Attributes: add a new allocalign attribute
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in
MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute
functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably
belongs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
2022-03-04 15:57:53 -05:00