This new command looks much like "memory read"
and mirrors its basic behaviour.
(lldb) memory tag read new_buf_ptr new_buf_ptr+32
Logical tag: 0x9
Allocation tags:
[0x900fffff7ffa000, 0x900fffff7ffa010): 0x9
[0x900fffff7ffa010, 0x900fffff7ffa020): 0x0
Important proprties:
* The end address is optional and defaults to reading
1 tag if ommitted
* It is an error to try to read tags if the architecture
or process doesn't support it, or if the range asked
for is not tagged.
* It is an error to read an inverted range (end < begin)
(logical tags are removed for this check so you can
pass tagged addresses here)
* The range will be expanded to fit the tagging granule,
so you can get more tags than simply (end-begin)/granule size.
Whatever you get back will always cover the original range.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97285
This adds memory tag reading using the new "qMemTags"
packet and ptrace on AArch64 Linux.
This new packet is following the one used by GDB.
(https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/General-Query-Packets.html)
On AArch64 Linux we use ptrace's PEEKMTETAGS to read
tags and we assume that lldb has already checked that the
memory region actually has tagging enabled.
We do not assume that lldb has expanded the requested range
to granules and expand it again to be sure.
(although lldb will be sending aligned ranges because it happens
to need them client side anyway)
Also we don't assume untagged addresses. So for AArch64 we'll
remove the top byte before using them. (the top byte includes
MTE and other non address data)
To do the ptrace read NativeProcessLinux will ask the native
register context for a memory tag manager based on the
type in the packet. This also gives you the ptrace numbers you need.
(it's called a register context but it also has non register data,
so it saves adding another per platform sub class)
The only supported platform for this is AArch64 Linux and the only
supported tag type is MTE allocation tags. Anything else will
error.
Ptrace can return a partial result but for lldb-server we will
be treating that as an error. To succeed we need to get all the tags
we expect.
(Note that the protocol leaves room for logical tags to be
read via qMemTags but this is not going to be implemented for lldb
at this time.)
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95601
This feature "memory-tagging+" indicates that lldb-server
supports memory tagging packets. (added in a later patch)
We check HWCAP2_MTE to decide whether to enable this
feature for Linux.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97282
TestExitDuringExpression test_exit_before_one_thread_no_unwind fails
sporadically on both Arm and AArch64 linux buildbots. This seems like
manifesting itself on a fully loaded machine. I have not found a reliable
timeout value so marking it skip for now.
Those tests are all failing for older Clang versions. This is adding the
respective test decorators for the passing Clang versions to get the recently
revived matrix bot green.
Without DW_CC_pass_by_* attributes that Clang 7 started to emit in this test
we don't properly read back the return value of the `get_*` functions and just
read bogus memory.
See also the TestReturnValue.py test.
Add a new feature to process save-core on Darwin systems -- for
lldb to create a user process corefile with only the dirty (modified
memory) pages included. All of the binaries that were used in the
corefile are assumed to still exist on the system for the duration
of the use of the corefile. A new --style option to process save-core
is added, so a full corefile can be requested if portability across
systems, or across time, is needed for this corefile.
debugserver can now identify the dirty pages in a memory region
when queried with qMemoryRegionInfo, and the size of vm pages is
given in qHostInfo.
Create a new "all image infos" LC_NOTE for Mach-O which allows us
to describe all of the binaries that were loaded in the process --
load address, UUID, file path, segment load addresses, and optionally
whether code from the binary was executing on any thread. The old
"read dyld_all_image_infos and then the in-memory Mach-O load
commands to get segment load addresses" no longer works when we
only have dirty memory.
rdar://69670807
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387
This adds a basic SB API for creating and stopping traces.
Note: This doesn't add any APIs for inspecting individual instructions. That'd be a more complicated change and it might be better to enhande the dump functionality to output the data in binary format. I'll leave that for a later diff.
This also enhances the existing tests so that they test the same flow using both the command interface and the SB API.
I also did some cleanup of legacy code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103500
Clang 5 and Clang 6 can no longer parse newer versions of libc++. As we can't
specify the specific libc++ version in the decorator, let's only allow Clang
versions that can parse all currently available libc++ versions.
This test is using -gpubnames which is only available since Clang 8. The
original Clang 7 requirement was based on the availability of
-accel-tables=Dwarf (which the test initially used before being changed to
-gpubnames in commit 15a6df52efaa7 ).
This patch builds on D100521 and other related patches to add support
for unwinding stack on AArch64 systems with pointer authentication
feature enabled.
We override FixCodeAddress and FixDataAddress function in ABISysV_arm64
class. We now try to calculate and set code and data masks after reading
data_mask and code_mask registers exposed by AArch64 targets running Linux.
This patch utilizes core file linux-aarch64-pac.core for testing that
LLDB can successfully unwind stack frames in the presence of signed
return address after masking off ignored bits.
This patch also includes a AArch64 Linux native test case to demonstrate
successful back trace calculation in presence of pointer authentication
feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99944
DWARF doesn't describe templates itself but only actual template instantiations.
Because of that LLDB has to infer the parameters of the class template
declarations from the actual instantiations when creating the internal Clang AST
from debug info
Because there is no dedicated DIE for the class template, LLDB also creates the
`ClassTemplateDecl` implicitly when parsing a template instantiation. To avoid
creating one ClassTemplateDecls for every instantiation,
`TypeSystemClang::CreateClassTemplateDecl` will check if there is already a
`ClassTemplateDecl` in the requested `DeclContext` and will reuse a found
fitting declaration.
The logic that checks if a found class template fits to an instantiation is
currently just comparing the name of the template. So right now we map
`template<typename T> struct S;` to an instantiation with the values `S<1, 2,
3>` even though they clearly don't belong together.
This causes crashes later on when for example the Itanium mangler's
`TemplateArgManglingInfo::needExactType` method tries to find fitting the class
template parameter that fits to an instantiation value. In the example above it
will try to find the parameter for the value `2` but will just trigger a
boundary check when retrieving the parameter with index 1 from the class
template.
There are two ways we can end up with an instantiation that doesn't fit to a
class template with the same name:
1. We have two TUs with two templates that have the same name and internal
linkage.
2. A forward declared template instantiation is emitted by GCC and Clang
without an empty list of parameter values.
This patch makes the check for whether a class template declaration can be
reused more sophisticated by also comparing whether the parameter values can fit
to the found class template. If we can't find a fitting class template we
justcreate a second class template with the fitting parameters.
Fixes rdar://76592821
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100662
This reverts commit f583029da3d6dbabe82f48b160227eb0120abd33,
0f94d68a2e15d50796439f20bcb508b95931d2ae and
a2363c0cf9b6a9a81c76ac652da667f73845d38b.
Due to test failures from incorrect SB API usage.
This reverts commit db93e4e70aa453e5ba04ba0d9e01f581882b6c81.
This modifies TestRegsters.py to account for Darwin showing
AVX registers as part of "Floating Point Registers" instead
of in a separate "Advanced Vector Extensions" category.
Both tests are passing for GCC>8 on Linux so let's mark them as passing.
TestCPPAuto was originally disabled due to "an problem with debug info generation"
in ea35dbeff29f3095df3ad1d77cce3d9e5b197e7c .
TestClassTemplateParameterPack was disabled without explanation in
0f01fb39e3fe3d8e99df1dd185e75ad584b777b3 .
This reverts commit 00764c36edf88ae9806e8d57a6addb782e6ceae8 and the
follow up d2223c7a49973a61cc2de62992662afa8d19065a.
The original patch broke that one could use static member variables while
inside a static member functions without having a running target. It seems that
LLDB currently requires that static variables are only found via the global
variable lookup so that they can get materialized and mapped to the argument
struct of the expression.
After 00764c36edf88ae9806e8d57a6addb782e6ceae8 static variables of the current
class could be found via Clang's lookup which LLDB isn't observing. This
resulting in expressions actually containing these variables as normal
globals that can't be rewritten to a member of the argument struct.
More specifically, in the test TestCPPThis, the expression
`expr --j false -- s_a` is now only passing if we have a runnable target.
I'll revert the patch as the possible fixes aren't trivial and it degrades
the debugging experience more than the issue that the revert patch addressed.
The underlying bug can be reproduced before/after this patch by stopping
in `TestCPPThis` main function and running: `e -j false -- my_a; A<int>::s_a`.
The `my_a` will pull in the `A<int>` class and the second expression will
be resolved by Clang on its own (which causes LLDB to not materialize the
static variable).
Note: A workaround is to just do `::s_a` which will force LLDB to take the global
variable lookup.
There is a common pattern:
result.AppendError(...);
result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusFailed);
I found that some commands don't actually "fail" but only
print "error: ..." because the second line got missed.
This can cause you to miss a failed command when you're
using the Python interface during testing.
(and produce some confusing script results)
I did not find any place where you would want to add
an error without setting the return status, so just
set eReturnStatusFailed whenever you add an error to
a command result.
This change does not remove any of the now redundant
SetStatus. This should allow us to see if there are any
tests that have commands unexpectedly fail with this change.
(the test suite passes for me but I don't have access to all
the systems we cover so there could be some corner cases)
Some tests that failed on x86 and AArch64 have been modified
to work with the new behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103701
This is another step towards implementing the equivalent of
`platform process list` and related functionality.
`uint32_t` is used for the argument count and index despite the
underlying value being `size_t` to be consistent with other
index-based access to arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103675
When checking for type properties we usually want to strip all kind of type
sugar from the type. For example, sugar like Clang's ElaboratedType or typedefs
rarely influence the fundamental behaviour of a type such as its byte size.
However we always need to preserve type sugar for everything else as it does
matter for users that their variable of type `size_t` instead of `unsigned long`
for example.
This patch fixes one such bug when trying to use the SBValue API to dereference
a type.
Reviewed By: werat, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103532
This is present when doing a `platform process list` and is
tracked by the underlying code. To do something like the
process list via the SB API in the future, this must be
exposed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103375
Previously ignore counts were checked when we stopped to do the sync callback in Breakpoint::ShouldStop. That meant we would do all the ignore count work even when
there is also a condition says the breakpoint should not stop.
That's wrong, lldb treats breakpoint hits that fail the thread or condition checks as "not having hit the breakpoint". So the ignore count check should happen after
the condition and thread checks in StopInfoBreakpoint::PerformAction.
The one side-effect of doing this is that if you have a breakpoint with a synchronous callback, it will run the synchronous callback before checking the ignore count.
That is probably a good thing, since this was already true of the condition and thread checks, so this removes an odd asymmetry. And breakpoints with sync callbacks
are all internal lldb breakpoints and there's not a really good reason why you would want one of these to use an ignore count (but not a condition or thread check...)
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D103217
The variable.rst documentation says:
```
If it returns a value, and that value is True, LLDB will be allowed to cache the children and the children count it previously obtained, and will not return to the provider class to ask. If nothing, None, or anything other than True is returned, LLDB will discard the cached information and ask. Regardless, whenever necessary LLDB will call update.
```
However, several update methods in gnu_libstdcpp.py were returning True,
which made lldb unaware of any changes in the corresponding objects.
This problem was visible by lldb-vscode in the following way:
- If a breakpoint is hit and there's a vector with the contents {1, 2},
it'll be displayed correctly.
- Then the user steps and the next stop contains the vector modified.
The program changed it to {1, 2, 3}
- frame var then displays {1, 2} incorrectly, due to the caching caused
by the update method
It's worth mentioning that none of libcxx.py'd update methods return True. Same for LibCxxVector.cpp, which returns false.
Added a very simple test that fails without this fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103209
This was originally failed because of llvm.org/pr21765 which describes that
LLDB can't call a debugee's functions, but I removed the (unnecessary)
function call in the rewrite. It seems that the actual bug here is that we
can't lookup static members at all, so let's X-FAIL the test for the right
reason.
Clang adds a Decl in two phases to a DeclContext. First it adds it invisible and
then it makes it visible (which will add it to the lookup data structures). It's
important that we can't do lookups into the DeclContext we are currently adding
the Decl to during this process as once the Decl has been added, any lookup will
automatically build a new lookup map and add the added Decl to it. The second
step would then add the Decl a second time to the lookup which will lead to
weird errors later one. I made adding a Decl twice to a lookup an assertion
error in D84827.
In the first step Clang also does some computations on the added Decl if it's
for example a FieldDecl that is added to a RecordDecl.
One of these computations is checking if the FieldDecl is of a record type
and the record type has a deleted constexpr destructor which will delete
the constexpr destructor of the record that got the FieldDecl.
This can lead to a bug with the way we implement MinimalImport in LLDB
and the following code:
```
struct Outer {
typedef int HookToOuter;
struct NestedClass {
HookToOuter RefToOuter;
} NestedClassMember; // We are adding this.
};
```
1. We just imported `Outer` minimally so far.
2. We are now asked to add `NestedClassMember` as a FieldDecl.
3. We import `NestedClass` minimally.
4. We add `NestedClassMember` and clang does a lookup for a constexpr dtor in
`NestedClass`. `NestedClassMember` hasn't been added to the lookup.
5. The lookup into `NestedClass` will now load the members of `NestedClass`.
6. We try to import the type of `RefToOuter` which will try to import the `HookToOuter` typedef.
7. We import the typedef and while importing we check for conflicts in `Outer` via a lookup.
8. The lookup into `Outer` will cause the invisible `NestedClassMember` to be added to the lookup.
9. We continue normally until we get back to the `addDecl` call in step 2.
10. We now add `NestedClassMember` to the lookup even though we already did that in step 8.
The fix here is disabling the minimal import for RecordTypes from FieldDecls. We
actually already did this, but so far we only force the definition of the type
to be imported *after* we imported the FieldDecl. This just moves that code
*before* we import the FieldDecl so prevent the issue above.
Reviewed By: shafik, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102993
It's not clear why the whole test got disabled, but the linked bug report
has since been fixed and the only part of it that still fails is the test
for the too permissive lookup. This re-enables the test, rewrites it to use
the modern test functions we have and splits the failing part into its
own test that we can skip without disabling the rest.
In D102771 wanted to make `test_var` global to demonstrate the a no-launch test,
but the old variable is still needed for another test. This just creates the
global var with a different name to demonstrate the no-launch functionality.
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
Other LLVM projects use the suffix `-depends` for the test dependencies,
however LLDB uses `-deps` and seems to be the only project under the
LLVM to do so.
In order to make the projects more homogeneous, switch all the
references to `lldb-test-deps` to `lldb-test-depends`.
Additionally, provide a compatibility target with the old name and
depending on the new name, in order to not break anyone workflow.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102889
`bool` is considered to be unsigned according to `std::is_unsigned<bool>::value` (and `Type::GetTypeInfo`). Encoding it as signed int works fine for normal variables and fields, but breaks when reading the values of boolean bitfields. If the field is declared as `bool b : 1` and has a value of `0b1`, the call to `SBValue::GetValueAsSigned()` will return `-1`.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102685
This patch updates `SBCompileUnit::FindLineEntryIndex` to pass a valid
`LineEntry` pointer to `CompileUnit::FindLineEntry`.
This caused `LineTable::FindLineEntryIndexByFileIndexImpl` to return its
`best_match` initial value (UINT32_MAX).
rdar://78115426
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102658
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This reverts commit bd5751f3d249ec0798060bd98c07272174c52af0.
This patch series is causing us to every so often miss switching
the state from eStateRunning to eStateStopped when we get the stop
packet from the debug server.
Reverting till I can figure out how that could be happening.
