This PR addresses a smaller detail discussed in the code review for
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66968. Currently, some
functions in the `libc++` PSTL CPU backend have been appended with a
digit to indicate the number of input iterator arguments. However, there
is no need to change the name for each version as overloading can be
used instead. This PR will make the naming more consistent in the the
CPU and the proposed OpenMP backend.
This allows smaller allocations to occur, closer to the actual
std::string's required size. This is particularly effective in
decreasing the allocation size upon initial construction (where
__recommend is called to determine the size).
Although the memory savings per-string are never more than 8 bytes per
string initially, this quickly adds up. And has lead to not insigficant
memory savings at Google.
Unfortunately, this change is ABI breaking because it changes the value
returned by max_size. So it has to be guarded.
This patch removes undefined behavior in list and forward_list and __hash_table
caused by improperly beginning and ending the lifetime of the various node
classes. It allows removing the _LIBCPP_STANDALONE_DEBUG macro from
these node types since we now properly begin and end their lifetime,
meaning that we won't trip up constructor homing.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D98750 for more information on what prompted
this patch.
This commit re-applies 0687e4d9f310, which had been reverted in b935882bdce7
because it broke the LLDB build. LLDB folks tell me I can go ahead and
re-commit this now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101206
Co-authored-by: Amy Kwan <amy.kwan1@ibm.com>
This updates the clang-format we use in libc++ to 17. This is necessary
to start running the generated-files checks in GitHub Actions (in
#68920). In fact this is a pre-existing issue regardless of #68920 --
right now our ignore_format.txt job disagrees with the LLVM-wide
clang-format job.
extents CTAD was requiring default constructibility of the extent
arguments due to the way we implemented a pack expansion. This
requirement is not in the standard.
Reported in issue #68671https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68671 by @hewillk.
Fixes#68671
Previously, libcxx forced all strings created during constant evaluation
to point to allocated memory. That was done due to implementation
difficultites, but it turns out not to be necessary. This patch permits
the use of SSO strings during constant evaluation, and also simplifies
the implementation.
This does have a downside in terms of enabling users to accidentally
write non-portable code, however, which I've documented in
UsingLibcxx.rst.
In particular, whether `constinit std::string x = "...";` will
successfully compile now depends on whether the string is smaller than
the SSO capacity -- in libc++, up to 22 bytes on 64-bit platforms, and
up to 10 bytes on 32-bit platforms. By comparison, libstdc++ and MSVC
have an SSO capacity of 15 bytes, except that in libstdc++,
constant-initialized strings cannot be used as function-locals because
the object contains a pointer to itself.
Closes#68434
To allow for a smoother transition, keep the safe mode working as is in
the LLVM 18 release (the first release that aims to make hardening
available), then deprecate it in LLVM 19.
Fixes#64619
Clang warns diagnostic for non-standard layout types in `offsetof` only
if they are in evaluated context. With this patch, you'll also get
diagnostic if you use `offsetof` on non-standard layout types in any
other contexts
This makes exception handling a lot simpler, since we don't have to convert any exceptions this way. Is also properly handles all the user-thrown exceptions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154238
Adding additional instantiations to the dylib isn't actually an ABI break as long as programs targeting an older dylib don't start to depend on them. Making additional instantiations a matter of availability allows us to add them without an ABI break.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Mordante
Spies: arichardson, ldionne, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154796
Standard says that implementation of math functions that have
floating-point-type parameter should provide an "overload for each
cv-unqualified floating-point type".
The diagnostics for `enable_if_t` are extremely opaque:
```
error: no matching function for call to 'bind_front'
note: candidate template ignored: requirement 'integral_constant<bool, false>::value' was not satisfied
```
Using requires-expressions gives us a little more context:
```
error: no matching function for call to 'bind_front'
note: candidate template ignored: constraints not satisfied
note: because 'is_constructible_v<decay_t<T &>, T &>' evaluated to false
```
Pull request: #68249
This patch removes undefined behavior in list and forward_list and __hash_table
caused by improperly beginning and ending the lifetime of the various node
classes. It allows removing the _LIBCPP_STANDALONE_DEBUG macro from
these node types since we now properly begin and end their lifetime,
meaning that we won't trip up constructor homing.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D98750 for more information on what prompted
this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101206
Co-authored-by: Amy Kwan <amy.kwan1@ibm.com>
Fixes#68051.
Current implementation passes the number of `_AlignedStorage` objects
when it calls to `allocate` and the number of **bytes** on `deallocate`.
This only applies to allocations that allocate control block and the
storage together, i.e. `make_shared` and `allocate_shared`.
Found by ASan under Clang combined with `-fsized-deallocation`.
This patch removes the non compliant constructor of std::future_error
and adds the standards compliant constructor in C++17 instead.
Note that we can't support the constructor as an extension in all
standard modes because it uses delegating constructors, which require
C++11. We could in theory support the constructor as an extension in
C++11 and C++14 only, however I believe it is acceptable not to do that
since I expect the breakage from this patch will be minimal.
If it turns out that more code than we expect is broken by this, we can
reconsider that decision.
This was found during D99515.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99567
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
We were incorrectly deducing the return type of size() because we were
not using ternary operators in the implementation (as the spec says).
Instead of deducing the common type of the expressions in the spec, we
would deduce potentially different return types and fail to compile.
Fixes#67551
The _LIBCPP_PSTL_CUSTOMIZATION_POINT macro was assuming that the policy
was called _RawPolicy and referencing it by name. It happened to always
work but this was definitely accidental and an oversight in the original
implementation. This patch fixes that by passing the policy to the macro
explicitly. Noticed while reviewing #66968.
Credits: this change is based on analysis and a proof of concept by
gerbens@google.com.
Before, the compiler loses track of end as 'this' and other references
possibly escape beyond the compiler's scope. This can be see in the
generated assembly:
16.28 │200c80: mov %r15d,(%rax)
60.87 │200c83: add $0x4,%rax
│200c87: mov %rax,-0x38(%rbp)
0.03 │200c8b: → jmpq 200d4e
...
...
1.69 │200d4e: cmp %r15d,%r12d
│200d51: → je 200c40
16.34 │200d57: inc %r15d
0.05 │200d5a: mov -0x38(%rbp),%rax
3.27 │200d5e: mov -0x30(%rbp),%r13
1.47 │200d62: cmp %r13,%rax
│200d65: → jne 200c80
We fix this by always explicitly storing the loaded local and pointer
back at the end of push back. This generates some slight source 'noise',
but creates nice and compact fast path code, i.e.:
32.64 │200760: mov %r14d,(%r12)
9.97 │200764: add $0x4,%r12
6.97 │200768: mov %r12,-0x38(%rbp)
32.17 │20076c: add $0x1,%r14d
2.36 │200770: cmp %r14d,%ebx
│200773: → je 200730
8.98 │200775: mov -0x30(%rbp),%r13
6.75 │200779: cmp %r13,%r12
│20077c: → jne 200760
Now there is a single store for the push_back value (as before), and a
single store for the end without a reload (dependency).
For fully local vectors, (i.e., not referenced elsewhere), the capacity
load and store inside the loop could also be removed, but this requires
more substantial refactoring inside vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80588
The tests were a bit of a mess -- the testing coverage wasn't bad but it
was extremely difficult to see what was being tested and where. I split
up the tests to make them easier to audit for completeness and did such
an audit, adding a few missing tests (e.g. the conditional noexcept-ness
of std::cbegin and std::cend). I also audited the synopsis and adjusted
it where it needed to be adjusted.
This patch is in preparation of fixing #67471.
This reverts commit 491b2810fb7fe5f080fa9c4f5945ed0a6909dc92.
This change broke valid code and generated incorrect diagnostics, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
This patch makes clang diagnose extensive cases of consteval if and is_constant_evaluated usage that are tautologically true or false.
This introduces a new IsRuntimeEvaluated boolean flag to Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that means the immediate appearance of if consteval or is_constant_evaluated are tautologically false(e.g. inside if !consteval {} block or non-constexpr-qualified function definition body)
This patch also pushes new expression evaluation context when parsing the condition of if constexpr and initializer of constexpr variables so that Sema can be aware that the use of consteval if and is_consteval are tautologically true in if constexpr condition and constexpr variable initializers.
BEFORE this patch, the warning for is_constant_evaluated was emitted from constant evaluator. This patch moves the warning logic to Sema in order to diagnose tautological use of is_constant_evaluated in the same way as consteval if.
This patch separates initializer evaluation context from InitializerScopeRAII.
This fixes a bug that was happening when user takes address of function address in initializers of non-local variables.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43760
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51567
Reviewed By: cor3ntin, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
This reduces the number of instantiations and also avoid blowing up
past the fold-expression limit of Clang.
This is NOT a general statement that we should strive to stay within
Clang's (sometimes way too small) limits, however in this case the
change will reduce the number of template instantiations while at the
same time doing that, which is good.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132509
Since LLVM 17 has been branched and is on the verge of being released,
we can drop the CI job that tests against Clang 15. I think the number
of cherry-picks to `release/17.x` will be a lot smaller now, so keeping
a Clang 15 job around for that purpose seems unnecessary.
As a fly-by, this patch also removes some Clang 15 workarounds and test
suite annotations as we usually do. It also removes some slightly older
gcc test suite annotations that were missed.
AppleClang 15 was released on September 18th and is now stable. Per our
policy, we're bumping the supported AppleClang compiler to the latest
release. This allows cleaning up the test suite, but most importantly
unblocking various other patches that are blocked on bumping the
compiler requirements.
Previously, assignment to a std::basic_string type with a _custom_
allocator could under certain conditions attempt to interpret part of
the target string's "short" string-content as if it was a "long" data
pointer, and attempt to deallocate a garbage value.
This is a serious bug, but code in which it might happen is rare. It
required:
1. the basic_string must be using a custom allocator type which sets the
propagate_on_container_copy_assignment trait to true (thus, it does not
affect the default allocator, nor most custom allocators).
2. the allocator for the target string must compare not equal to the
allocator for the source string (many allocators always compare equal).
3. the source of the copy must currently contain a "long" string, and
the assignment-target must currently contain a "short" string.
Finally, the issue would've typically been innocuous when the bytes
misinterpreted as a pointer were all zero, as deallocating a nullptr is
typically a no-op. This is why existing test cases did not exhibit an
issue: they were all zero-length strings, which do not have data in the
bytes interpreted as a pointer.
This makes it obvious that libc++ is used in an unsupported configuration,
and the compiler probably has to be updated. It often happens that people
try to use libc++ and don't realize that their compiler is too old.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158214
Since we are defining these typedefs inside namespace std, we need to
refer to ::once_flag (the C Standard Library version). Otherwise
'once_flag' refers to 'std::once_flag', and that's not something we can
pass to the C Standard Library '::call_once()' function later on.
The helper function `__pair_like_explicit_wknd` is only SFINAE-ed with
`tuple_size<remove_cvref_t<_PairLike>>::value == 2`, but its function
body assumes `std::get` being valid.
Fixes#65620
Thanks to Giuseppe D'Angelo for pointing this out on the cpplang Slack!
The example implementation in https://eel.is/c++draft/string.view.comparison#example-1
was necessary when it was written, in C++17, but in C++20 we don't need that
complexity anymore, because of the reversed candidates that are
synthesized by the compiler.
