Remove the unnecessary `"llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"` include directive from
`ComplexDeinterleavingPass.h` and move it to the corresponding source
file.
Add missing includes that were transitively included by this header to 3
other source files.
This reduces the total number of preprocessing tokens across the LLVM
source files in `lib` from (roughly) 1,964,876,961 to 1,935,091,611 - a
reduction of ~1.52%. This should result in a small improvement in
compilation time.
Remove the unnecessary `"llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"` include directive from
`ComplexDeinterleavingPass.h` and move it to the corresponding source
file.
Add missing includes that were transitively included by this header to 2
other source files.
This reduces the total number of preprocessing tokens across the LLVM
source files in `lib` from (roughly) 1,964,876,961 to 1,935,091,611 - a
reduction of ~1.52%. This should result in a small improvement in
compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150514
According to
https://llvm.org/docs/HowToUpdateDebugInfo.html#when-to-preserve-an-instruction-location,
when moving (and in our case cloning) within the same BB, the debug
location is preserved. But when moving / cloning to a different BB, we
preserve the debug location only if the destination BB contains the same
location. Currently we preserve the debug loc unconditionally in all
cases. This CL correctly handles the debug locs in DebugValueManager.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148115
In `DebugValueManager`, if a `Def` is requested to be sunk to the same
place (i.e., `Insert` is right after `Def`, not counting `DBG_VALUE`s)
currently we still do the sink. This can result in unnecessary creation
of `DBG_VALUE $noreg`. See comments for details. This CL detects this
case and do nothing and return, so we don't end up creating unnecessary
undef `DBG_VALUE`s.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146860
The current `DebugValueManager`, which is mostly used in `RegStackify`,
simply sinks `DBG_VALUE`s along when a def instruction sinks.
(`RegStackify` only does sinks; it doesn't do hoists.)
But this simple strategy can result in incorrect combinations of
variables' values which would have not been possible in the original
program. In this case, LLVM's policy is to make the value unavailable,
so they will be shown as 'optimized out', rather than showing inaccurate
debug info. Especially, when an instruction sinks, its original
`DBG_VALUE` should be set to undef. This is well illustrated in the
third example in
https://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#instruction-scheduling.
This CL rewrites `DebugValueManager` with this principle in mind. When
sinking an instruction, it sinks its eligible `DBG_VALUE`s with it, but
also leaves undef `DBG_VALUE`s in the original place to make those
variables' values undefined.
Also, unlike the current version, we sink only an eligible subset of
`DBG_VALUE`s with a def instruction. See comments in the code for
details.
In case of cloning, because the original def is still there, we don't
set its `DBG_VALUE`s to undef. But we clone only an eligible subset of
`DBG_VALUE`s here as well.
One consequence of this change is that now we do sinking and cloning of
the def instruction itself within the `DebugValueManager`'s `sink` and
`clone` methods. This is necessary because the `DebugValueManager` needs
to know the original def's location before sinking and cloning in order
to scan other interfering `DBG_VALUE`s between the original def and the
insertion point. If we want to separate these two, we need to call
`DebugValueManager`'s `sink` and `clone` methods //before//
sinking/cloning the def instruction, which I don't think is a good
design alternative either, because the user of this class needs to pay
extra attention when using it.
Because this change is fixing the existing inaccuracy of the current
debug info, this reduces the variable info coverage in debug info, but
not by a large margin. In Emscripten core benchmarks compiled with
`-O1`, the coverage goes from 56.6% down to 55.2%, which I doubt will be
a noticeable drop. The compilation time doesn't have any meaningful
difference either with this change.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146744
Misc. cleanups for `WebAssemblyDebugValueManager`.
- Use `Register` for registers
- Simpler for loop iteration
- Rename a variable
- Reorder methods
- Reduce `SmallVector` size for `DBG_VALUE`s to 1; one def usually have
a single `DBG_VALUE` attached to it in most cases
- Add a few more lines of comments
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146743
`WebAssemblyDebugValueManager` does not currently handle
`DBG_VALUE_LIST`, which is a recent addition to LLVM. We tried to
nullify them within the constructor of `WebAssemblyDebugValueManager` in
D102589, but it made the class error-prone to use because it deletes
instructions within the constructor and thus invalidates existing
iterators within the BB, so the user of the class should take special
care not to use invalidated iterators. This actually caused a bug in
ExplicitLocals pass.
Instead of trying to fix ExplicitLocals pass to make the iterator usage
correct, which is possible but error-prone, this adds
NullifyDebugValueLists pass that nullifies all `DBG_VALUE_LIST`
instructions before we run WebAssembly specific passes in the backend.
We can remove this pass after we implement handlers for
`DBG_VALUE_LIST`s in `WebAssemblyDebugValueManager` and elsewhere.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/14255.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102999
WebAssemblyDebugValueManager class currently does not handle
DBG_VALUE_LIST instructions correctly for two reasons, which are
explained in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50361.
This effectively nullifies DBG_VALUE_LISTs in
WebAssemblyDebugValueManager so that the info will appear as "optimized
out" in debuggers but still be at least correct in the meantime.
Reviewed By: dschuff, jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102589
This patch adds handling for DBG_VALUE_LIST in the MIR-passes (after
finalize-isel), excluding the debug liveness passes and DWARF emission. This
most significantly affects MachineSink, which now needs to consider all used
registers of a debug value when sinking, but for most passes this change is
simply replacing getDebugOperand(0) with an iteration over all debug operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92578
Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect
reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc; simplifies `spillReg` behaviour
so as to not be dependent on changes elsewhere in the patch stack.
This reverts commit d2000b45d033c06dc7973f59909a0ad12887ff51.
This patch adds a new instruction that can represent variadic debug values,
DBG_VALUE_VAR. This patch alone covers the addition of the instruction and a set
of basic code changes in MachineInstr and a few adjacent areas, but does not
correctly handle variadic debug values outside of these areas, nor does it
generate them at any point.
The new instruction is similar to the existing DBG_VALUE instruction, with the
following differences: the operands are in a different order, any number of
values may be used in the instruction following the Variable and Expression
operands (these are referred to in code as “debug operands”) and are indexed
from 0 so that getDebugOperand(X) == getOperand(X+2), and the Expression in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR must use the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator to pass arguments into the
expression.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator is only valid in expressions appearing in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR; it takes a single argument and pushes the debug operand at the
index given by the argument onto the Expression stack. For example the
sub-expression `DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0` has the meaning “Push the debug operand at
index 0 onto the expression stack.”
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363
A struct in C passed by value did not get debug information. Such values are currently
lowered to a Wasm local even in -O0 (not to an alloca like on other archs), which becomes
a Target Index operand (TI_LOCAL). The DWARF writing code was not emitting locations
in for TI's specifically if the location is a single range (not a list).
In addition, the ExplicitLocals pass which removes the ARGUMENT pseudo instructions did
not update the associated DBG_VALUEs, and couldn't even find these values since the code
assumed such instructions are adjacent, which is not the case here.
Also fixed asm printing of TIs needed by a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94140
Following on from this RFC[0] from a while back, this is the first patch towards
implementing variadic debug values.
This patch specifically adds a set of functions to MachineInstr for performing
operations specific to debug values, and replacing uses of the more general
functions where appropriate. The most prevalent of these is replacing
getOperand(0) with getDebugOperand(0) for debug-value-specific code, as the
operands corresponding to values will no longer be at index 0, but index 2 and
upwards: getDebugOperand(x) == getOperand(x+2). Similar replacements have been
added for the other operands, along with some helper functions to replace
oft-repeated code and operate on a variable number of value operands.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139376.html<Paste>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81852
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
As described in PR40209, there can be issues in DBG_VALUEs handling when multiple defs present in a BB. This patch
adds logic for detection of related to def DBG_VALUEs and localizes register update and movement to found DBG_VALUEs.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: mgorny, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56401
llvm-svn: 351216
