We have to be careful in SimplifyDemandedBits with loads in case we attempt to combine back to a constant (which then gets turned into a constant pool load again), but we can at least set the upper KnownBits for a ZEXTLoad to zero.
We don't need tests for truncating the result. There's nothing
special about those truncates.
We can test llrint/llround for 64-bit and 32-bit targets in the same file.
Same with lrint/lround with i32 result result. lrint/lround with
64-bit result should only occur on a 64-bit target.
Add some missing tests for f80 conversions.
The code paths in the absence of TargetMachine, TargetLowering or
TargetRegisterInfo are poorly tested. As rL285987 said, requiring
TargetPassConfig allows us to delete many (untested) checks littered
everywhere.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73754
We were checking that the original Value * for the compare operands
were null. But that can never happen.
I believe we intended to check for 0 registers here instead.
Fixes PR44749.
This is based on this llvm-dev thread http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137521.html
The current strategy for f16 is to promote type to float every except where the specific width is required like loads, stores, and bitcasts. This results in rounding occurring in odd places instead of immediately after arithmetic operations. This interacts in weird ways with the __fp16 type in clang which is a storage only type where arithmetic is always promoted to float. InstCombine can remove some fpext/fptruncs around such arithmetic and turn it into arithmetic on half. This wouldn't be so bad if SelectionDAG was able to put those fpext/fpround back in when it promotes.
It is also not obvious how to handle to make the existing strategy work with STRICT fp. We need to use STRICT versions of the conversions which require chain operands. But if the conversions are created for a bitcast, there is no place to get an appropriate chain from.
This patch implements a different strategy where conversions are emitted directly around arithmetic operations. And otherwise its passed around as an i16 including in arguments and return values. This can result in more conversions between arithmetic operations, but is closer to matching the IR the frontend generates for __fp16. And it will allow us to use the chain from constrained arithmetic nodes to link the STRICT_FP_TO_FP16/STRICT_FP16_TO_FP that will need to be added. I've set it up so that each target can opt into the new behavior. Converting all the targets myself was more than I was able to handle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73749
This allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to create a simpler ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, which is particularly useful for cases where we're splitting into subvectors anyhow.
Some code gen passes use MBFIWrapper to keep track of the frequency of new
blocks. This was not taken into account and could lead to incorrect frequencies
as MBFI silently returns zero frequency for unknown/new blocks.
Add a variant for MBFIWrapper in the PGSO query interface.
Depends on D73494.
For a MC_GlobalAddress reference to a dso_local external GlobalValue with a definition, emit .Lfoo$local to avoid a relocation.
-fno-pic and -fpie can infer dso_local but -fpic cannot. In the future,
we can explore the possibility of inferring dso_local with -fpic. As the
description of D73228 says, LLVM's existing IPO optimization behaviors
(like -fno-semantic-interposition) and a previous assembly behavior give
us enough license to be aggressive here.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73230
For `MC_GlobalAddress` operands referencing **certain** GlobalObjects,
we can lower them to STB_LOCAL aliases to avoid costs brought by
assembler/linker's conservative decisions about symbol interposition:
* An assembler conservatively assumes a global default visibility symbol interposable (ELF
semantics). So relocations in object files are needed even if the code generator assumed
the definition exact and non-interposable.
* The relocations can cause the creation of PLT entries on some targets for -shared links.
A linker conservatively assumes a global default visibility symbol interposable (if not
otherwise constrained by -Bsymbolic/--dynamic-list/VER_NDX_LOCAL/etc).
"certain" refers to GlobalObjects in the intersection of
`hasExactDefinition() and !isInterposable()`: `external`, `appending`, `internal`, `private`.
Local linkages (`internal` and `private`) cannot be interposed. `appending` is for very
few objects LLVM interpret specially. So the set just includes `external`.
This patch emits STB_LOCAL aliases (.Lfoo$local) for such GlobalObjects, so that targets can lower
MC_GlobalAddress operands to STB_LOCAL aliases if applicable.
We may extend the scope and include GlobalAlias in the future.
LLVM's existing -fno-semantic-interposition behaviors give us license to do such optimizations:
* Various optimizations (ipconstprop, inliner, sccp, sroa, etc) treat normal ExternalLinkage
GlobalObjects as non-interposable.
* Before D72197, MC resolved a PC-relative VK_None fixup to a non-local symbol at assembly time (no
outstanding relocation), if the target is defined in the same section. Put it simply, even if IR
optimizations failed to optimize and allowed interposition for the function call in
`void foo() {} void bar() { foo(); }`, the assembler would disallow it.
This patch sets up AsmPrinter infrastructure to make -fno-semantic-interposition more so.
With and without the patch, the object file output should be identical:
`.Lfoo$local` does not take a symbol table entry.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73228
ISD::FROUND is defined to round to nearest with ties rounding
away from 0. This mode isn't supported in hardware on X86.
But as long as we aren't compiling with trapping math, we can
emulate this with floor(X + copysign(nextafter(0.5, 0.0), X)).
We have to use nextafter to avoid some corner cases that adding
0.5 would have. For example, if X is nextafter(0.5, 0.0) it should
round to 0.0, but adding 0.5 would need one extra bit of mantissa
than can be stored so it rounds to 1.0. Adding nextafter(0.5, 0.0)
instead will just increase the exponent by 1 and leave the mantissa
as all 1s. This would be nextafter(1.0, 0.0) which will floor to 0.0.
Techically this requires -fno-trapping-math which isn't our default.
But if we care about exceptions we should be using constrained
intrinsics. Constrained intrinsics would use STRICT_FROUND which
won't go through this code.
Fixes PR42195.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73607
This code needs to map from the FPCW 2-bit encoding for rounding mode to the 2-bit encoding defined for FLT_ROUNDS. The previous implementation did some clever swapping of bits and adding 1 modulo 4 to do the mapping.
This patch instead uses an 8-bit immediate as a lookup table of four 2-bit values. Then we use the 2-bit FPCW encoding to index the lookup table by using a right shift and an AND. This requires extracting the 2-bit value from FPCW and multipying it by 2 to make it usable as a shift amount. But still results in less code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73599
For `ret i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (i32* @foo to i64), i64 1701208431)`,
```
X86DAGToDAGISel::matchAdd
...
// AM.setBaseReg(CurDAG->getRegister(X86::RIP, MVT::i64));
if (!matchAddressRecursively(N.getOperand(0), AM, Depth+1) &&
// Try folding offset but fail; there is a symbolic displacement, so offset cannot be too large
!matchAddressRecursively(Handle.getValue().getOperand(1), AM, Depth+1))
return false;
...
// Try again after commuting the operands.
// AM.Disp = Val; foldOffsetIntoAddress() does not know there will be a symbolic displacement
if (!matchAddressRecursively(Handle.getValue().getOperand(1), AM, Depth+1) &&
// AM.setBaseReg(CurDAG->getRegister(X86::RIP, MVT::i64));
!matchAddressRecursively(Handle.getValue().getOperand(0), AM, Depth+1))
// Succeeded! Produced leaq sym+disp(%rip),...
return false;
```
`foldOffsetIntoAddress()` currently does not know there is a symbolic
displacement and can fold a large offset.
The produced `leaq sym+disp(%rip), %rax` instruction is relocated by
an R_X86_64_PC32. If disp is large and sym+disp-rip>=2**31, there
will be a relocation overflow.
This approach is still not elegant. Unfortunately the isRIPRelative
interface is a bit clumsy. I tried several solutions and eventually
picked this one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73606
Summary: X86 has instructions to calculate fma and fneg at the same time. But we combine the fneg and fma only when fneg is the source operand under strict FP.
Reviewers: craig.topper, andrew.w.kaylor, uweigand, RKSimon, LiuChen3
Subscribers: LuoYuanke, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, jdoerfert, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72824
Summary:
This is a follow up on D61634. It adds an LLVM IR intrinsic to allow better implementation of memcpy from C++.
A follow up CL will add the intrinsics in Clang.
Reviewers: courbet, theraven, t.p.northover, jdoerfert, tejohnson
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71710
This allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to create a simpler ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, which is particularly useful for cases where we're splitting into subvectors anyhow.
Differential Revision: This allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to create a simpler ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, which is particularly useful for cases where we're splitting into subvectors anyhow.
Pull out combineTargetShuffle code added in rG3fd5d1c6e7db into a helper function and extend it to handle shufps(shufps(load(),x),y) and shufps(y,shufps(load(),x)) cases as well.
Unlike the existing code that I modified here, I only handle the
case where the strict_fsetcc has a single use. Not sure exactly
how to handle multiples uses.
Testing this on X86 is hard because we already have a other
combines that get rid of lowered version of the integer setcc that
this xor will eventually become. So this combine really just
saves a bunch of extra nodes being created. Not sure about other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71816
This previously only handled EXTRACT_SUBREGs from leafs, such as
operands directly in the original output. Handle extracting from a
result instruction.
As mentioned on D73023, lowerShuffleWithSHUFPS should be able to commute the shufps inputs to fold the second arg as it will then permute the shufps result anyway.
