ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-time) circular
dependency between lldbCore and lldbValueObject, which is unfortunate
but probably unavoidable because so many things in LLDB rely on
ValueObject. We already have cycles and these libraries are never built
as dylibs so while this doesn't improve the situation, it also doesn't
make things worse.
The header includes were updated with the following command:
```
find . -type f -exec sed -i.bak "s%include \"lldb/Core/ValueObject%include \"lldb/ValueObject/ValueObject%" '{}' \;
```
It turns out all existing callers of `GetChildMemberWithName` pass true for `can_create`.
This change makes `true` the default value, callers don't have to pass an opaque true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151966
`GetChildMemberWithName` does not need a `ConstString`. This change makes the function
take a `StringRef` instead, which alleviates the need for callers to construct a
`ConstString`. I don't expect this change to improve performance, only ergonomics.
This is in support of Alex's effort to replace `ConstString` where appropriate.
There are related `ValueObject` functions that can also be changed, if this is accepted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151615
This patch adds support for evaluating expressions which reference
a captured `this` from within the context of a C++ lambda expression.
Currently LLDB doesn't provide Clang with enough information to
determine that we're inside a lambda expression and are allowed to
access variables on a captured `this`; instead Clang simply fails
to parse the expression.
There are two problems to solve here:
1. Make sure `clang::Sema` doesn't reject the expression due to an
illegal member access.
2. Materialize all the captured variables/member variables required
to evaluate the expression.
To address (1), we currently import the outer structure's AST context
onto `$__lldb_class`, making the `contextClass` and the `NamingClass`
match, a requirement by `clang::Sema::BuildPossibleImplicitMemberExpr`.
To address (2), we inject all captured variables as locals into the
expression source code.
**Testing**
* Added API test
