ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-time) circular
dependency between lldbCore and lldbValueObject, which is unfortunate
but probably unavoidable because so many things in LLDB rely on
ValueObject. We already have cycles and these libraries are never built
as dylibs so while this doesn't improve the situation, it also doesn't
make things worse.
The header includes were updated with the following command:
```
find . -type f -exec sed -i.bak "s%include \"lldb/Core/ValueObject%include \"lldb/ValueObject/ValueObject%" '{}' \;
```
This caused following warnings in an LLDB build:
```
[237/1072] Building CXX object tools/l...lusLanguage.dir/LibCxxSliceArray.cpp.o
/Volumes/Data/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxxSliceArray.cpp:38:53: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Wformat]
38 | stream.Printf("stride=%" PRIu64 " size=%" PRIu64, stride, size);
| ~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
/Volumes/Data/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxxSliceArray.cpp:38:61: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Wformat]
38 | stream.Printf("stride=%" PRIu64 " size=%" PRIu64, stride, size);
| ~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~
2 warnings generated.
```
This patch simply changes the format specifiers to use the `%zu` for
`size_t`s.
