ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-time) circular
dependency between lldbCore and lldbValueObject, which is unfortunate
but probably unavoidable because so many things in LLDB rely on
ValueObject. We already have cycles and these libraries are never built
as dylibs so while this doesn't improve the situation, it also doesn't
make things worse.
The header includes were updated with the following command:
```
find . -type f -exec sed -i.bak "s%include \"lldb/Core/ValueObject%include \"lldb/ValueObject/ValueObject%" '{}' \;
```
Summary:
This doesn't exist in other LLVM projects any longer and doesn't
do anything.
Reviewers: chaoren, labath
Subscribers: emaste, tberghammer, lldb-commits, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12586
llvm-svn: 246749
- generate-vers.pl has to be called by cmake to generate the version number
- parallel builds not yet supported; dependency on clang must be explicitly specified
Tested on Linux.
- Building on Mac will require code-signing logic to be implemented.
- Building on Windows will require OS-detection logic and some selective directory inclusion
Thanks to Carlo Kok (who originally prepared these CMakefiles for Windows) and Ben Langmuir
who ported them to Linux!
llvm-svn: 175795
