Presently, compiler selectivelly adds nop when opsel != 0 i.e. only when
partially writing to high bytes.
Experiments in SWDEV-499733 and SWDEV-501347 suggest that we need nop
for above cases irrespective of opsel values.
Note: We might need to add few others into the same table.
gfx950 SP changes doc says:
No 4 clk forwarding on opcodes that convert from
F32/F16->F8 or F32/F16->F4. Must insert a NOP or
instruction writing some other destination VREG
after a conversion to F4/F8 since it writes either
low/high half or bytes.
Co-authored-by: Pravin Jagtap <Pravin.Jagtap@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Byrnes <Jeffrey.Byrnes@amd.com>
The 2-pass XDL write VGPR, read by non-XDL SGEMM/DGEMM case
was 1 wait state overly conservative. Previously, for gfx940,
the XDL/non-XDL cases happened to have the same number of cycles
in all cases. Now the XDL consumer case has an additional state for
2 pass sources.
Any SGPR read by a VALU can potentially obscure SALU writes to the same
register.
Insert s_wait_alu instructions to mitigate the hazard on affected paths.
Compute a global cache of SGPRs with any VALU reads and use this to
avoid inserting mitigation for SGPRs never accessed by VALUs.
To avoid excessive search when compile time is priority implement
secondary mode where all SALU writes are mitigated.
Co-authored-by: Shilei Tian <shilei.tian@amd.com>
MI300 ISA section 4.5 states there is a hazard between "VALU op which
uses OPSEL or SDWA with changes the result’s bit position" and "VALU op
consumes result of that op"
This includes the case where the second op is SDWA with same dest and
dst_sel != DWORD && dst_unused == UNUSED_PRESERVE. In this case, there
is an implicit read of the first op dst and the compiler needs to
resolve this hazard. Confirmed with HW team.
We model dst_unused == UNUSED_PRESERVE as tied-def of implicit operand,
so this PR checks for that.
MI300_SP_MAS section 1.3.9.2 specifies that CVT_SR_FP8_F32 and
CVT_SR_BF8_F32 with opsel[3:2] !=0 have dest forwarding issue.
Currently, we only add check for CVT_SR_FP8_F32 with opsel[3] != 0 --
this PR adds support opsel[2] != 0 as well
On GFX11.5 shaders having completed exports need to execute/wait at a
lower priority than shaders still executing exports.
Add code to maintain normal priority of 2 for shaders that export and
drop to priority 0 after exports.
Fixes#82659
There are some functions, such as `findRegisterDefOperandIdx` and `findRegisterDefOperand`, that have too many default parameters. As a result, we have encountered some issues due to the lack of TRI parameters, as shown in issue #82411.
Following @RKSimon 's suggestion, this patch refactors 9 functions, including `{reads, kills, defines, modifies}Register`, `registerDefIsDead`, and `findRegister{UseOperandIdx, UseOperand, DefOperandIdx, DefOperand}`, adjusting the order of the TRI parameter and making it required. In addition, all the places that call these functions have also been updated correctly to ensure no additional impact.
After this, the caller of these functions should explicitly know whether to pass the `TargetRegisterInfo` or just a `nullptr`.
Try to make this editable by using functions for the number of wait
states as a function of the number of passes. I'm assuming the current
hazard test coverage is comprehensive.
This could probably use another round to further simplify it.
Alternatively, I believe this could all be expressed in a constant table
indexed by an instruction classify function and number of passes.
One V_NOP or unrelated VALU instruction in between is required for
correctness when matrix A or B of current WMMA instruction overlaps with
matrix D of previous WMMA instruction.
Remaining cases of WMMA operand overlaps are handled by the hardware and
do not require handling in hazard recognizer.
Hardware may stall in cases where:
- matrix C of current WMMA instruction overlaps with matrix D of
previous WMMA instruction
- VALU instruction reads matrix D of previous WMMA instruction
- matrix A,B or C of WMMA instruction reads result of previous VALU
instruction
Update SIMemoryLegalizer and SIInsertWaitcnts to use separate wait
instructions per counter (e.g. S_WAIT_LOADCNT) and split VMCNT into
separate LOADCNT, SAMPLECNT and BVHCNT counters.
Modify GCNHazardRecognizer::fixLdsDirectVMEMHazard() so the waitvsrc
operand
in gfx12 DS_PARAM_LOAD or DS_DIRECT_LOAD instructions is set
appropriately
depending on whether a hazard is found or not, rather than inserting an
S_WAITCNT_DEPCTR instruction if a hazard needs to be mitigated.
Co-authored-by: Stephen Thomas <Stephen.Thomas@amd.com>
D150312 added a TODO:
TODO: consider renaming the field `StartAtCycle` and `Cycles` to
`AcquireAtCycle` and `ReleaseAtCycle` respectively, to stress the
fact that resource allocation is now represented as an interval,
relatively to the issue cycle of the instruction.
This patch implements that TODO. This naming clarifies how to use these
fields in the scheduler. In addition it was confusing that `StartAtCycle` was
singular but `Cycles` was plural. This renaming fixes this inconsistency.
This commit as previously reverted since it missed renaming that came
down after rebasing. This version of the commit fixes those problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158568
D150312 added a TODO:
TODO: consider renaming the field `StartAtCycle` and `Cycles` to
`AcquireAtCycle` and `ReleaseAtCycle` respectively, to stress the
fact that resource allocation is now represented as an interval,
relatively to the issue cycle of the instruction.
This patch implements that TODO. This naming clarifies how to use these
fields in the scheduler. In addition it was confusing that `StartAtCycle` was
singular but `Cycles` was plural. This renaming fixes this inconsistency.
This commit as previously reverted since it missed renaming that came
down after rebasing. This version of the commit fixes those problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158568
GCNHazardRecognizer::fixVcmpxExecWARHazard() mitigates a specific hazard
by inserting a wait on sa_sdst==0 if such a wait isn't already present.
Unfortunately, the check for an existing wait incorrectly checks for one
that doesn't actually care about sa_sdst itself, but requires that no
other counters are waited for.
Once the check is performed correctly, a lit test needs to be updated,
since it is currently testing for the incorrect behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154438
Add functions AMDGPU::DepCtr::encodeField*() and AMDGPU::DepCtr::decodeField*()
for each of vm_vsrc, va_vdst and sa_sdst. These are now used in
AMDGPUInsertDelayAlu and GCNHazardRecognizer so as to make working with
S_WAITCNT_DEPCTR operands easier and more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154424
By inspection. Because of the strange behaviour of MI.uses(), this was
adding implicit defs to the clause *uses* set, and then wrongly
detecting a conflict between explicit defs and implicit defs.
For example it would detect a conflict on this pair of instructions:
$vgpr0 = BUFFER_LOAD_DWORD_OFFSET $sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, 0, 4088, 0, 0, implicit $exec, implicit-def $vgpr0_vgpr1 :: (load (s32) from %stack.1, addrspace 5)
$vgpr1 = BUFFER_LOAD_DWORD_OFFSET $sgpr0_sgpr1_sgpr2_sgpr3, 0, 4092, 0, 0, implicit $exec, implicit-def $vgpr0_vgpr1 :: (load (s32) from %stack.1 + 4, addrspace 5)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150947
Change MCInstrDesc::operands to return an ArrayRef so we can easily use
it everywhere instead of the (IMHO ugly) opInfo_begin and opInfo_end.
A future patch will remove opInfo_begin and opInfo_end.
Also use it instead of raw access to the OpInfo pointer. A future patch
will remove this pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142213
Accelerate finding the base class for a physical register by
building a statically mapping table from physical registers
to base classes using TableGen.
Replace uses of SIRegisterInfo::getPhysRegClass with
TargetRegisterInfo::getPhysRegBaseClass in order to use
the computed table.
Reviewed By: arsenm, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139422
isLiteralConstant and isLiteralConstantLike were similar to
!isInlineConstant with slight differences like handling isReg operands.
To avoid a profusion of similar functions with undocumented differences,
this patch removes all the isLiteralConstant* variants. Callers are responsible
for handling the isReg case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125759
In a lot of places, we were just calling `getNamedOperandIdx` to check if the result was != or == to -1.
This is fine in itself, but it's verbose and doesn't make the intention clear, IMHO. I added a `hasNamedOperand` and replaced all cases I could find with regexes and manually.
Reviewed By: arsenm, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137540
A small number of cleanups and refactors intended to enhance readability in
two passes that deal with s_waitcnt instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136677
If inline asm has a VGPR def, it must have come from a VGPR write
somewhere inside the asm. This should be further extended to all
read after write hazards.
VALU use of an SGPR (pair) as mask followed by SALU write to the
same SGPR can cause incorrect execution of subsequent SALU reads
of the SGPR.
Reviewed By: foad, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134151
After D133067 we are inserting swaps to use a new physical
register. I have noticed verifier errors about undefined
physical register uses if we are tracking liveness post RA.
We have no access to LIS at this point, so mark new register
uses as undef to calm down the verifier. Liveness should not
matter at this point anyway.
Note the description of the RegState::Undef: "Value of the
register doesn't matter." I.e. it does not say it is strictly
undefined. In fact that is what we really need: this value
does not matter.
I also had to modify the test a bit since with tracking enabled
it does not pass verification even before the recognizer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133459
In this case gfx90a uses v0 instead of the correct register. Swap
the value temporarily with a lower register and then swap it back.
Unfortunately hazard recognizer works after wait count insertion,
so we cannot simply reuse an arbitrary register, hence w/a also
includes a full waitcount. This can be avoided if we run it from
expandPostRAPseudo, but that is a complete misplacement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133067
