`DecomposeCallGraphTypes.cpp` was a workaround around missing 1:N
support in the dialect conversion. Now that 1:N support was added, the
workaround can be deleted. The test remains in place, as an example for
how to write such a transformation with the dialect conversion
framework.
Note for LLVM integration: If you are using
`DecomposeCallGraphTypes.cpp`, switch to the patterns that are used in
`TestDecomposeCallGraphTypes.cpp`.
This commit adds a new `matchAndRewrite` overload to `ConversionPattern`
to support 1:N replacements. This is the first of two main PRs that
merge the 1:1 and 1:N dialect conversion drivers.
The existing `matchAndRewrite` function supports only 1:1 replacements,
as can be seen from the `ArrayRef<Value>` parameter.
```c++
LogicalResult ConversionPattern::matchAndRewrite(
Operation *op, ArrayRef<Value> operands /*adaptor values*/,
ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const;
```
This commit adds a `matchAndRewrite` overload that is called by the
dialect conversion driver. By default, this new overload dispatches to
the original 1:1 `matchAndRewrite` implementation. Existing
`ConversionPattern`s do not need to be changed as long as there are no
1:N type conversions or value replacements.
```c++
LogicalResult ConversionPattern::matchAndRewrite(
Operation *op, ArrayRef<ValueRange> operands /*adaptor values*/,
ConversionPatternRewriter &rewriter) const {
// Note: getOneToOneAdaptorOperands produces a fatal error if at least one
// ValueRange has 0 or more than 1 value.
return matchAndRewrite(op, getOneToOneAdaptorOperands(operands), rewriter);
}
```
The `ConversionValueMapping`, which keeps track of value replacements
and materializations, still does not support 1:N replacements. We still
rely on argument materializations to convert N replacement values back
into a single value. The `ConversionValueMapping` will be generalized to
1:N mappings in the second main PR.
Before handing the adaptor values to a `ConversionPattern`, all argument
materializations are "unpacked". The `ConversionPattern` receives N
replacement values and does not see any argument materializations. This
implementation strategy allows us to use the 1:N infrastructure/API in
`ConversionPattern`s even though some functionality is still missing in
the driver. This strategy was chosen to keep the sizes of the PRs
smaller and to make it easier for downstream users to adapt to API
changes.
This commit also updates the the "decompose call graphs" transformation
and the "sparse tensor codegen" transformation to use the new 1:N
`ConversionPattern` API.
Note for LLVM conversion: If you are using a type converter with 1:N
type conversion rules or if your patterns are performing 1:N
replacements (via `replaceOpWithMultiple` or
`applySignatureConversion`), conversion pattern applications will start
failing (fatal LLVM error) with this error message: `pattern 'name' does
not support 1:N conversion`. The name of the failing pattern is shown in
the error message. These patterns must be updated to the new 1:N
`matchAndRewrite` API.
This commit adds support for 1:N result type conversions for `func.call`
ops. In that case, argument materializations to the original result type
should be inserted (via `replaceOpWithMultiple`).
This commit is in preparation of merging the 1:1 and 1:N conversion
drivers.
This commit marks the type converter in `populate...` functions as
`const`. This is useful for debugging.
Patterns already take a `const` type converter. However, some
`populate...` functions do not only add new patterns, but also add
additional type conversion rules. That makes it difficult to find the
place where a type conversion was added in the code base. With this
change, all `populate...` functions that only populate pattern now have
a `const` type converter. Programmers can then conclude from the
function signature that these functions do not register any new type
conversion rules.
Also some minor cleanups around the 1:N dialect conversion
infrastructure, which did not always pass the type converter as a
`const` object internally.
This commit renames 4 pattern rewriter API functions:
* `updateRootInPlace` -> `modifyOpInPlace`
* `startRootUpdate` -> `startOpModification`
* `finalizeRootUpdate` -> `finalizeOpModification`
* `cancelRootUpdate` -> `cancelOpModification`
The term "root" is a misnomer. The root is the op that a rewrite pattern
matches against
(https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/PatternRewriter/#root-operation-name-optional).
A rewriter must be notified of all in-place op modifications, not just
in-place modifications of the root
(https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/PatternRewriter/#pattern-rewriter). The old
function names were confusing and have contributed to various broken
rewrite patterns.
Note: The new function names use the term "modify" instead of "update"
for consistency with the `RewriterBase::Listener` terminology
(`notifyOperationModified`).
Previously, the CallOpSignatureConversion pattern would assert if
function signature change affected the number of results. Fail the
pattern instead and let the caller propagate failure.
Fixes#60186.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142624
This patch revamps the BranchOpInterface a bit and allows a proper implementation of what was previously `getMutableSuccessorOperands` for operations, which internally produce arguments to some of the block arguments. A motivating example for this would be an invoke op with a error handling path:
```
invoke %function(%0)
label ^success ^error(%1 : i32)
^error(%e: !error, %arg0 : i32):
...
```
The advantages of this are that any users of `BranchOpInterface` can still argue over remaining block argument operands (such as `%1` in the example above), as well as make use of the modifying capabilities to add more operands, erase an operand etc.
The way this patch implements that functionality is via a new class called `SuccessorOperands`, which is now returned by `getSuccessorOperands`. It basically contains an `unsigned` denoting how many operator produced operands exist, as well as a `MutableOperandRange`, which are the usual forwarded operands we are used to. The produced operands are assumed to the first few block arguments, followed by the forwarded operands afterwards. The role of `SuccessorOperands` is to provide various utility functions to modify and query the successor arguments from a `BranchOpInterface`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123062
The last remaining operations in the standard dialect all revolve around
FuncOp/function related constructs. This patch simply handles the initial
renaming (which by itself is already huge), but there are a large number
of cleanups unlocked/necessary afterwards:
* Removing a bunch of unnecessary dependencies on Func
* Cleaning up the From/ToStandard conversion passes
* Preparing for the move of FuncOp to the Func dialect
See the discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120624
